Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the STICKNEY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of STICKNEY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to STICKNEY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
55C40A2461S1961SD035001STICKNEY6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.5272217,-98.2041702
55C40A2462S1961SD035002STICKNEY6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.5366669,-98.2611084

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the STICKNEY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the STICKNEY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the STICKNEY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the STICKNEY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with STICKNEY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the STICKNEY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the STICKNEY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with STICKNEY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. SD-2010-11-01-17 | Spink County - 2009

    Pattern of soils and underlying materials in the Hand-Ethan-Bonilla and Northville-Farmsworth-Durrstein associations (Soil Survey of Spink County, South Dakota; 2009).

  2. SD-2012-03-15-15 | Davison County - January 1974

    Typical pattern of Houdek and Stickney soils in association 3 and of Houdek, Prosper, and Tetonka in association 4 (Soil Survey of Davison County, SD; 1974).

  3. SD-2012-03-15-67 | Lake County - December 1973

    Relationship of soils to topography and the underlying materials in the Houdek-Prosper association (Soil Survey of Lake County, SD; 1973).

  4. SD-2012-03-15-78 | Miner County - December 1984

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Houdek-Dudley-Stickney association (Soil Survey of Miner County, SD; 1984).

  5. SD-2012-03-15-79 | Miner County - December 1984

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Clarno-Stickney association (Soil Survey of Miner County, SD; 1984).

Map Units

Map units containing STICKNEY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Beadle-Stickney complex, 1 to 6 percent slopesBaB7723548272yyg3sd00319791:20000
Stickney-Dudley silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesDsA378763545652wkpgsd00519761:20000
Beadle-Stickney complex, 1 to 6 percent slopesBaB202993545472yyg3sd00519761:20000
Beadle-Stickney complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesBaA147423545462yyg2sd00519761:20000
Stickney-Jerauld silt loamSt2630354601cwzrsd00519761:20000
Houdek-Stickney complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesHsA39204177442wkp9sd02519921:20000
Houdek-Stickney-Tetonka complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesHt33474177462wkpcsd02519921:20000
Stickney-Dudley silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesSy20064177912wkpgsd02519921:20000
Houdek-Stickney complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesHsB5484177452wkpbsd02519921:20000
Beadle-Stickney complex, 1 to 6 percent slopesBeB4544176902yyg3sd02519921:20000
Houdek-Stickney complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesHsA339363529262wkp9sd03519661:20000
Stickney-Dudley silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesSdA51913529352wkpgsd03519661:20000
Tetonka-Stickney complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesTsA537352939cv84sd03519661:20000
Houdek-Stickney complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesCsA67273548852wkp9sd04319791:20000
Beadle-Stickney complex, 1 to 6 percent slopesBaB1033548772yyg3sd04319791:20000
Stickney-Dudley silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesNaA2453551842wkpgsd04919811:20000
Prosper-Stickney loams, nearly levelBcA10705352580ctwksd05919591:20000
Stickney-Dudley silt loams, nearly levelCsA4214352590ctwwsd05919591:20000
Stickney-Prosper loams, nearly levelCrA1622352589ctwvsd05919591:20000
Dudley-Stickney silt loams, nearly levelCcA1360352583ctwnsd05919591:20000
Stickney-Java-Hoven complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesSvA40455353849cw6hsd06919921:20000
Stickney-Java loams, 0 to 4 percent slopesStA10870353848cw6gsd06919921:20000
Cavo-Stickney loamsCs10326353789cw4ksd06919921:20000
Glenham-Stickney-Hoven complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesGuA7289353803cw50sd06919921:20000
Houdek-Stickney complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesHsA415924174892wkp9sd07719921:20000
Stickney-Dudley-Hoven silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesSv278784175162wkpfsd07719921:20000
Houdek-Stickney-Tetonka complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesHt204344174912wkpcsd07719921:20000
Houdek-Stickney complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesHsB78234174902wkpbsd07719921:20000
Beadle-Stickney complex, 1 to 6 percent slopesBdB8594174542yyg3sd07719921:20000
Stickney-Dudley silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesSt4414175152wkpgsd07719921:20000
Stickney-Tetonka complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesStA2515416515fzdzsd07919671:20000
Houdek-Stickney-Tetonka complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesCnA425633553902wkpcsd09719831:20000
Clarno-Stickney-Tetonka complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesCnB30316355391cxt7sd09719831:20000
Stickney-Dudley silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesSd93693554092wkpgsd09719831:20000
Houdek-Stickney complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesHfA223993547962wkp9sd11119781:20000
Beadle-Stickney complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesBeA255813565622yyg2sd11519971:24000
Stickney-Dudley-Hoven silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesSu153673567102wkpfsd11519971:24000
Houdek-Stickney complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesHwA144933566592wkp9sd11519971:24000
Houdek-Stickney-Tetonka complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesHxA88723566602wkpcsd11519971:24000
Stickney-Dudley silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesSt31593567092wkpgsd11519971:24000
Beadle-Stickney complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, very stonyBfA28523565642yyjxsd11519971:24000
Beadle-Stickney complex, 1 to 6 percent slopesBeB7763565632yyg3sd11519971:24000
Beadle-Stickney complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes, very stonyBfB5233565652yyjysd11519971:24000
Clarno-Crossplain-Stickney complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesChA2942418066g110sd13519771:20000
Prosper-Stickney complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesPr62321417991g0ylsd60219751:20000
Stickney-Dudley silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesDsA193214179592wkpgsd60219751:20000
Houdek-Stickney complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesCsA44574179482wkp9sd60219751:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the STICKNEY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .