Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ST. LUCIE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ST. LUCIE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ST. LUCIE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
154S28_007S1982FL055007St. Lucie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.2002811,-81.3546448
155S05_0271967-FL009-S05_027St. Lucie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.3876858,-80.7541351
155S50_0201973-FL099-S50_020St. Lucie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties26.5800552,-80.0843353
155S49_001S1970FL097001St. Lucie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.224247,-81.1832199
155S49_007S1972FL097007St. Lucie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.3477726,-81.2504196
155S56_010S1975FL111010St. Lucie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.418047,-80.3150558
155S31_014S1982FL061014St. Lucie3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.5726242,-80.3784256

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ST. LUCIE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ST. LUCIE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ST. LUCIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ST. LUCIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ST. LUCIE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ST. LUCIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ST. LUCIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ST. LUCIE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. FL-2011-05-31-04 | Indian River County - 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Astatula-Archbold-St. Lucie map unit and the Immokalee- Myakka-Satellite map unit (Soil Survey of Indian River County, Florida; 1987).

  2. FL-2012-04-26-09 | Seminole County - June 1966

    Cross section of Seminole County showing the relationship between the geologic strata and artesian and nonartesian water, and the relative position of some of the sandy soils to the ground water table (Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida; June 1966).

  3. MS-2012-04-26-07 | Harrison County - June 1975

    Distribution and pattern of major soils in Handsboro-St. Lucie association (Soil Survey of Harrison County, Mississippi; June 1975).

Map Units

Map units containing ST. LUCIE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
St. Lucie-Leon-Muck complexSt3403328209c0jdal00319611:20000
St. Lucie sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesSsB2709328208c0jcal00319611:20000
St. Lucie fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes56248814733422twsrfl00919901:24000
St. Lucie fine sand, 5 to 12 percent slopes5735014733432x9fgfl00919901:24000
St. Lucie fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes3882013844162tzwrfl04919811:20000
St. Lucie sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes2281014135022tzwqfl05519821:24000
St. Lucie sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes118537567362tzwpfl06119841:20000
Paola and St. Lucie sands, 0 to 8 percent slopes61012414215581jq7qfl08519791:20000
Paola and St. Lucie sands, 8 to 20 percent slopes77149414216231jq9tfl08519791:20000
St. Lucie-Paola-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes3487114215821jq8hfl08519791:20000
St. Lucie fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes3838233231522v17sfl09519861:20000
St. Lucie-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes392061323153bv89fl09519861:20000
St. Lucie fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes43254128667712twsrfl09719761:20000
Paola and St. Lucie soils and Urban land2011201017096134ckfl10320031:24000
Paola and St. Lucie soils and Urban land, 5 to 12 percent slopes215101017101134cqfl10320031:24000
St. Lucie fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes29236014250192v17sfl10519871:20000
St. Lucie sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes42208314211992tzwpfl11119901:24000
Paola-St. Lucie sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes24468014787081lmq8fl11719861:20000
St. Lucie fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes62150515441672twsrfl12719771:20000
St. Lucie fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes34101013898992tzwrfl60619811:20000
St. Lucie sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes43711815422972tzwqfl60719701:20000
St. Lucie fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes25104128220322twsrfl60919681:24000
St. Lucie-Paola-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes412180014073001j7dsfl61119941:20000
St. Lucie sand, hummockySv812332457c4yfms04719711:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ST. LUCIE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .