Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SPANAWAY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SPANAWAY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SPANAWAY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
272C0076S1972WA041013SPANAWAY7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.7447205,-122.9747238
204N0762S2004WA053002Spanaway6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.1195183,-122.5605774

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SPANAWAY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SPANAWAY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SPANAWAY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SPANAWAY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SPANAWAY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SPANAWAY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SPANAWAY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SPANAWAY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WA-2012-05-11-18 | Grays Harbor County Area, Pacific County, and Wahkiakum County - July 1986

    Pattern of soils and parent material in general soil map unit 3 (Soil Survey of Grays Harbor County Area, Pacific County, and Wahkiakum County, Washington; July 1986).

  2. WA-2012-05-11-30 | Lewis County Area - May 1987

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Spanaway map unit (Soil Survey of Lewis County Area, Washington; May 1987).

Map Units

Map units containing SPANAWAY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Spanaway very gravelly sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes135544735722gk9wa62719791:24000
Spanaway gravelly sandy loam2123276743692hd0wa64119801:24000
Spanaway gravelly sandy loam41A29334747062hqwwa65319741:24000
Spanaway gravelly sandy loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes11177426513972ndb7wa65319741:24000
Everett-Spanaway-Spana complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes311224226513952ppkqwa65319741:24000
Urban land-Spanaway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes306623932420542zl8fwa65319741:24000
Spana-Spanaway-Nisqually complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes311111726513962ppkrwa65319741:24000
Spanaway-Nisqually complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes30722532420602zl8mwa65319741:24000
Spanaway gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes1102606024547102ndb6wa66719831:24000
Spanaway-Nisqually complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes114921424547142ndbbwa66719831:24000
Spanaway gravelly sandy loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes111305124547112ndb7wa66719831:24000
Spanaway stony sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes112196624547122ndb8wa66719831:24000
Spanaway stony sandy loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes113109024547132ndb9wa66719831:24000
Everett-Spanaway complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes31004626514022nczwwa66719831:24000
Spanaway-Nisqually complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes30723432270652zl8mwa77620211:24000
Urban land-Spanaway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes30662232270592zl8fwa77620211:24000
Spanaway gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes1103124125085092pplhwa77720121:24000
Spanaway gravelly sandy loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes111767324958522ppkswa77720121:24000
Urban land-Spanaway complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes992667524958622ppktwa77720121:24000
Everett-Spanaway complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes3100362324543902nczwwa77720121:24000
Everett-Spanaway-Spana complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes3112323924958612ppkqwa77720121:24000
Spana-Spanaway-Nisqually complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes3111121724958632ppkrwa77720121:24000
Spanaway stony sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes112425085052pplcwa77720121:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SPANAWAY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .