Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SONOMA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SONOMA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SONOMA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
2483P087083NV015006Sonoma7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.7647209,-117.0147247
2740A32071956NV027001Sonoma5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.1438889,-118.4686111
2740A32201956NV027002SONOMA5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.1577778,-118.4555556

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SONOMA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SONOMA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SONOMA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SONOMA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SONOMA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SONOMA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SONOMA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SONOMA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NV-2012-05-09-10 | Lander County, North Part - May 1992

    Typical relationship of general soil map units and landscapes: Sonoma-Rixie-Paranat (3); Orovada-Broyles-Shabliss (7); Buffaran-Allor-Chiara (11); Bioya-Chiara-Cortez (12); Robson-Akerue-Buffaran (16); Sumine-Chen-Rock outcrop (19); and Quarz-Walti-Glean (21) (Soil Survey of Lander County, Nevada, North Part; May 1992).

  2. NV-2012-05-09-14 | Lander County, South Part - November 1991

    General soil map units representative of those on a semibolson that is an externally drained intermontane basin (Soil Survey of Lander County, Nevada, South Part; November 1991).

  3. NV-2012-05-09-21 | Pershing County, East Part - May 1994

    General soil map units representative of those on a semibolson that is an externally drained intermontane basin. These units are 4—Humboldt-Sonoma-Sondoa; 6—Jerval-Dun Glen-Tenabo; 7—Chiara-Cortez-Orovada; 8—Jerval-Misad-Knoss; 9—Theon-Singatse; 10—Trunk-Burrita-Hoot; and 11—Reluctan-Roca-Iver (Soil Survey of Pershing County, Nevada, East Part; May 1994).

Map Units

Map units containing SONOMA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Sonoma-Poole families complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes.3773934471490htmcca73219981:24000
Sonoma-Poole families complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes.377iw21488498htmcca80219961:24000
Sonoma silt loam, drained1612750477072j0ffnv76319861:24000
Sonoma-Sonoma, occasionally flooded association1833925474923hy63nv76519861:24000
Sonoma-Deleplain-Ocala association1873010474926hy66nv76519861:24000
Sonoma-Devilsgait-Sonoma, strongly saline-Sodic association1802680474921hy61nv76519861:24000
Sonoma-Devilsgait-Sonoma, occasionally flooded association1822520474922hy62nv76519861:24000
Kelk-Sonoma association5802005475058hybgnv76519861:24000
Sonoma-Ocala variant association1851245474924hy64nv76519861:24000
Sonoma, frequently flooded-Devilsgait-Sonoma association16482026338552rgmxnv76519861:24000
Sonoma-Devilsgait association031072226338742rgnhnv76519861:24000
Kolda-Duffer-Sonoma association16201650478670j22znv76619941:24000
Sonoma-Kelk association311554478294j1pvnv76619941:24000
Sonoma-Devilsgait association310344478293j1ptnv76619941:24000
Sonoma, frequently flooded-Devilsgait-Sonoma association1638593478760j25wnv76719861:24000
Kelk-Sonoma association1493818478753j25nnv76719861:24000
Sonoma-Sonoma, rarely flooded association1613282478758j25tnv76719861:24000
Devilsgait-Sonoma association4433019478911j2brnv76719861:24000
Ocala-Sonoma association2592749478859j292nv76719861:24000
Sonoma-Hussa association1622339478759j25vnv76719861:24000
Sonoma variant-Halleck association2942030478868j29cnv76719861:24000
Sonoma-Kelk association1671200478766j262nv76719861:24000
Sonoma-Devilsgait association1661177478762j25ynv76719861:24000
Wendane-Sonoma-Valmy association11469115479041j2gynv76819851:63360
Ocala-Sonoma-Paranat association6838880479296j2r5nv76819851:63360
Sonoma-Paranat association9988430479315j2rsnv76819851:63360
Sonoma-Wendane-Paranat association9994420479316j2rtnv76819851:63360
Sonoma-Wendane association9903980479314j2rrnv76819851:63360
Yobe-Sonoma association14116543475213hyhgnv76919861:24000
Sonoma silt loam, occasionally flooded, strongly saline-sodic5613988475279hyklnv76919861:24000
Sonoma silt loam42002021476973j0b7nv77419851:24000
Sonoma silty clay loam, frequently flooded567678626339512rhg7nv77519851:24000
Batan-Wendane-Sonoma association1666460479488j2ycnv77519851:24000
Wendane-Sonoma-Valmy association11461955479419j2w4nv77519851:24000
Sonoma silty clay loam, strongly saline, occasionally flooded9951875479754j36ynv77519851:24000
Sonoma silty clay loam, drained, strongly saline, occasionally flooded9941325479753j36xnv77519851:24000
Argenta-Sonoma complex1521220479477j2y0nv77519851:24000
Prida-Sonoma silty clay loams774955479717j35rnv77519851:24000
Sonoma silt loam, strongly saline, rarely flooded992955479751j36vnv77519851:24000
Sonoma silty clay loam, strongly saline56342126339502rhg6nv77519851:24000
Sonoma silt loam, drained990335479749j36snv77519851:24000
Sonoma silty clay loam, strongly saline, frequently flooded997305479756j370nv77519851:24000
Sonoma, strongly saline-Sonoma complex996305479755j36znv77519851:24000
Sonoma silt loam, drained, slightly saline991280479750j36tnv77519851:24000
Sonoma variant silt loam200120479512j2z4nv77519851:24000
Sonoma silty clay loam, strongly saline, frequently flooded99717526340622rn30nv77619831:63360
Sonoma variant silt loam*20065479793j386nv77619831:63360
Sonoma silt loam, strongly saline 1/56113408475796hz38nv77719931:24000
Sonoma-Paranat complex 1/5667364475800hz3dnv77719931:24000
Sonoma silty clay loam, occasionally flooded 1/5626978475797hz39nv77719931:24000
Wendane-Sonoma complex 1/11045507475403hyplnv77719931:24000
Sonoma silty clay loam, strongly saline 1/5631305475798hz3bnv77719931:24000
Sonoma silt loam, drained 1/5641152475799hz3cnv77719931:24000
Sonoma silty clay loam, frequently flooded 1/567586475801hz3fnv77719931:24000
Sonoma silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes41442732708712v4zrnv77719931:24000
Sonoma-Kelk association10204442480137j3m9nv78019901:24000
Sonoma silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes414432828446542v4zror64420211:24000
Wabuska-Sonoma complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes409391428446322v4z0or64420211:24000
Sonoma-Alvodest complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes411228928446342v4z2or64420211:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SONOMA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .