Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SNELL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SNELL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SNELL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
1098P0244S1997OR023034SNELL6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.5377769,-119.480278

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SNELL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SNELL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SNELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SNELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SNELL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SNELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SNELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SNELL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OR-2012-05-10-11 | Baker County Area - June 1997

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material In the Gwinly-Immig-Snell unit (Soil Survey of Baker County Area, Oregon; June 1997).

Map Units

Map units containing SNELL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Snell very stony loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes228345459137hdrwca60219781:24000
Snell very stony loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes1771100486643jbd5ca68419861:24000
Snell-Sharesnout complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes15729204486009j9qqid67519921:24000
Cleavage-Snell complex, 5 to 50 percent slopes4220582486192j9xmid67519921:24000
Doodlelink-Snell-Parkay complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes506147486210j9y6id67519921:24000
Snell-Kiyi association, 3 to 40 percent slopes1565993486007j9qnid67519921:24000
Snell-Ateron complex, 12 to 35 percent north slopes155D317916213922nhor60419881:24000
Snell-Ateron complex, 35 to 60 percent north slopes155E227936214022njor60419881:24000
Gwinly-Immig-Snell very cobbly silt loams, 12 to 35 percent slopes60D60866223922rqor60419881:24000
Sag-Snell complex, 12 to 35 percent north slopes146D55866212122mxor60419881:24000
Sag-Snell complex, 35 to 50 percent north slopes146E37276212222myor60419881:24000
Gwinly-Immig-Snell very cobbly silt loams, 35 to 50 percent slopes60E36596224022rror60419881:24000
Snell-Sag complex, 50 to 70 percent north slopes157F24736214222nlor60419881:24000
Snell-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 35 percent north slopes156D13286214122nkor60419881:24000
Gwinly-Immig-Snell very cobbly silt loams, 50 to 70 percent slopes60F12166224122rsor60419881:24000
Rock outcrop-Snell complex, 50 to 80 percent north slopes137F10336210622mfor60419881:24000
Snell-Harlow complex, moist, 2 to 15 percent slopes3331AO733120215njh9or60720181:24000
Snell-Bocker-Anatone complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3323BO5731204291r021or60720181:24000
Harlow-Snell-Imnaha complex, moist, 30 to 60 percent south slopes73E1446403024mhor62519791:20000
Ateron-Snell complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes4316NO283385478rcr2or62620181:24000
Snell-Imnaha-Rock outcrop complex, moist, 60 to 90 percent north slopes6017DN223122084njhtor62620181:24000
Skullgulch-Snell complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes260C24173426360nk48or6271:24000
Ateron-Snell complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes207E11313425173rcr2or6271:24000
Ateron-Snell-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 90 percent south slopes207F352342506225xtpor6271:24000
Snell-Bocker-Anatone complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3323CO196524370891r022or63120181:24000
Snell-Bocker-Anatone complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3323AO64424370881qqjlor63120181:24000
Gwinly-Immig-Snell very cobbly silt loams, 35 to 50 percent slopes4030CO324243714922rror63120181:24000
Snell-Bocker-Anatone complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3323BO16924867131r021or63120181:24000
Snell-Imnaha-Rock outcrop complex, moist, 60 to 90 percent north slopes6017DN1102437438njhtor63120181:24000
Gwinly-Immig-Snell very cobbly silt loams, 12 to 35 percent slopes4030BO99243714822rqor63120181:24000
Harlow-Imnaha-Snell complex, moist, 30 to 60 percent south slopes3328CO992437096nj5gor63120181:24000
Harlow-Imnaha-Snell complex, moist, 15 to 30 percent south slopes3328BO702437095nj57or63120181:24000
Gwinly-Immig-Snell very cobbly silt loams, 50 to 70 percent slopes4030DO40243715022rsor63120181:24000
Snell-Harlow complex, moist, 2 to 15 percent slopes3331AO172437099njh9or63120181:24000
Sag-Snell complex, 35 to 50 percent north slopes4035CN16243715522myor63120181:24000
Snell-Ateron complex, 12 to 35 percent north slopes4040BN5248680422nhor63120181:24000
Snell very stony loam, 35 to 70 percent north slopes56F88256135821v9or64819771:24000
Snell-Bocker-Anatone complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3323BO5631214581r021or66719841:20000
Snell-Harlow complex, 15 to 30 percent north slopes28121142846712v3bor67019991:24000
Snell-Harlow complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes28012452846702v39or67019991:24000
Snell-Harlow complex, 30 to 60 percent north slopes2826745846722v3cor67019991:24000
Harlow-Snell-Imnaha complex, moist, 2 to 15 percent slopes1235316844952txnor67019991:24000
Snell-Harlow complex, 15 to 30 percent south slopes2834763846732v3dor67019991:24000
Harlow-Snell-Imnaha complex, moist, 30 to 60 percent south slopes1254585844972txqor67019991:24000
Snell-Harlow silt loams, 0 to 15 percent slopes2844339846742v3for67019991:24000
Snell-Harlow-Imnaha complex, moist, 30 to 60 percent north slopes2863104846762v3hor67019991:24000
Harlow-Snell-Imnaha complex, moist, 15 to 30 percent south slopes1243011844962txpor67019991:24000
Snell-Imnaha-Rock outcrop complex, moist, 60 to 90 percent north slopes2881850846792v3lor67019991:24000
Snell-Harlow-Imnaha complex, moist, 15 to 30 percent north slopes2851351846752v3gor67019991:24000
Snell-Harlow-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes287122846782v3kor67019991:24000
Demasters-Snell complex, 30 to 70 percent north slopes6023847852v70or67019991:24000
Harlow-Snell-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 90 percent south slopes12617844622twlor67019991:24000
Snell silty clay loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes27916844662twqor67019991:24000
Ateron-Snell-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 90 percent south slopes207F924342199225xtpor6771:24000
Anatone-Snell complex, 15 to 40 percent north slopes144E831342201026bwor6771:24000
Snell very stony ashy loam, 40 to 70 percent south slopes143F512342452026bvor6771:24000
Ateron-Snell complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes207E713424812rcr2or6771:24000
Snell-Harlow complex, moist, 2 to 15 percent slopes3331AO33424936njh9or6771:24000
Harlow-Snell-Harlow variant complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes455271694462b86wa60319841:24000
Snell silty clay loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes944064695002b9ywa60319841:24000
Getaway-Snell complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes352971694352b7vwa60319841:24000
Snell-Harlow-Demasters complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes961714695022bb0wa60319841:24000
Harlow-Snell very stony clay loams, 30 to 70 percent slopes441675694452b85wa60319841:24000
Snell-Harlow-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 90 percent slopes971301695032bb1wa60319841:24000
Demasters-Snell complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes26988694252b7jwa60319841:24000
Harlow-Snell-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 90 percent slopes46835694472b87wa60319841:24000
Harlow-Snell-Imnaha complex, moist, 2 to 15 percent slopes118529817782wfz2wa60319841:24000
Snell silty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes95309695012b9zwa60319841:24000
Harlow-Snell-Imnaha complex, moist, 30 to 60 percent south slopes120235817783wfz3wa60319841:24000
Getaway-Snell complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes35105697452bkvwa62319701:20000
Snell-Harlow-Demasters complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes9623697652blhwa62319701:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SNELL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .