Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SMILING soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SMILING, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SMILING were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
2112N8332S2012OR035002Smiling6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.4777778,-121.8386111
612N8333S2012OR035003Smiling6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.5419444,-121.8236111
612N8335S2012OR035005Smiling6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.5603306,-121.7345194

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SMILING soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SMILING series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SMILING series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SMILING series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SMILING share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SMILING series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SMILING series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SMILING, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing SMILING as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Smiling-Fryrear complex, Green Ridge influenced, 0 to 15 percent slopes11191417342370231dtgor6051:24000
Smiling-Windego complex, Green Ridge influenced, 15 to 30 percent slopes1120541342370331dthor6051:24000
Terraverde-Smiling-Mackatie complex, mass failure, 15 to 30 percent slopes3445BM170473426071135c1or6181:24000
Terraverde-Smiling-Mackatie complex, mass failure, 30 to 70 percent slopes3445CM618134261102xfv3or6181:24000
Terraverde-Smiling-Mackatie complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes3445AO22834347332ydx0or6181:24000
Smiling sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes124C13600634322406or62019921:24000
Windego-Smiling-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes163E596063516242xor62019921:24000
Windego-Smiling complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes161E470063511242ror62019921:24000
Windego-Smiling complex, cool, 30 to 50 percent slopes162E318563513242tor62019921:24000
Smiling-Windego complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes125D2940634332407or62019921:24000
Smiling-Windego complex, cool, 0 to 15 percent slopes126C1715634342408or62019921:24000
Windego-Smiling-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes163D163163515242wor62019921:24000
Smiling-Windego complex, cool, 15 to 30 percent slopes126D923634352409or62019921:24000
Flarm-Smiling complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes48C5306374324b7or62019921:24000
Kweo-Smiling complex, 8 to 50 percent slopes70D4436384724flor62019921:24000
Smiling-Simnasho complex, high precipitation, 0 to 12 percent slopes61C22326304023lkor67319751:20000
Smiling-Simnasho complex, high precipitation, 0 to 12 percent slopes133335116311223nwor67419931:24000
Smiling-Simnasho complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes132271776311023ntor67419931:24000
Terraverde-Smiling-Mackatie complex, mass failure, 15 to 30 percent slopes3445BM5333421842135c1or6771:24000
Terraverde-Smiling-Mackatie complex, mass failure, 30 to 70 percent slopes3445CM10234244802xfv3or6771:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SMILING soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .