Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SKUMPAH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SKUMPAH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SKUMPAH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
28A81P060681UT045004Skumpah8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.6877785,-113.1263885
28A09N1057S2009UT045002Skumpah8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.1660156,-113.0208969

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SKUMPAH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SKUMPAH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SKUMPAH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SKUMPAH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SKUMPAH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SKUMPAH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SKUMPAH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SKUMPAH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. UT-2010-11-05-01 | Tooele County Area - 2000

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Playas-Saltair-Salt flats and Skumpah-Yenrab-Dynal general soil map units (Soil Survey of Tooele County Area, Utah; 2000).

  2. UT-2012-03-22-12 | Tooele Area - 2000

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Playas-Saltair-Salt flats and Skumpah-Yenrab-Dynal general soil map units (Soil Survey of Tooele Area, Utah; Tooele County and Parts of Box Elder, Davis, and Juab Counties, Utah, and Parts of White Pine and Elko Counties, Nevada; 2000).

Map Units

Map units containing SKUMPAH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Sagers-Skumpah complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes735676506765k0b8co68019701:31680
Avalon-Mack-Skumpah complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes793122506770k0bfco68019701:31680
Skumpah very fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes941960506776k0bmco68019701:31680
Skumpah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesBcA1071506780k0brco68019701:31680
Skumpah-Playas complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes78167102481290j4thut60119851:24000
Skumpah, sodic-Playas complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes7983887481291j4tjut60119851:24000
Skumpah-Skumpah, sodic-Swingler association, 1 to 3 percent slopes8065045481293j4tlut60119851:24000
Hiko Peak-Taylorsflat-Skumpah association, 1 to 12 percent slopes3914740481247j4s3ut60119851:24000
Skumpah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes56185652482164j5qput61119921:24000
Skumpah silt loam, saline, 0 to 2 percent slopes5993291482167j5qsut61119921:24000
Skumpah-Yenrab complex, saline, 0 to 15 percent slopes6063130482169j5qvut61119921:24000
Skumpah silt loam, wet substratum, saline, 0 to 1 percent slopes5827419482166j5qrut61119921:24000
Skumpah silt loam, wet substratum, 0 to 1 percent slopes577542482165j5qqut61119921:24000
Uvada-Skumpah families association, 0 to 2 percent slopes8815682831839172x4hhut6171:24000
Skumpah family, 0 to 3 percent slopes7614444631839042x4h2ut6171:24000
Saltair-Skumpah families association, 0 to 2 percent slopes697422231838962x4gtut6171:24000
Skumpah-Rafael families association, 0 to 3 percent slopes774556831839052x4h3ut6171:24000
Skumpah silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes75126931839032x4h1ut6171:24000
Skumpah family, gravelly substratum, 0 to 3 percent slopes7417831839022x4h0ut6171:24000
Avalon-Mack-Skumpah complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes6791942990970k0bfut62419851:24000
Skumpah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedSrC21525482344j5xhut62719711:24000
Skumpah-Xeric Haplogypsids complex, 2 to 10 percent slopesP1141924539522ncjrut62719711:24000
Skumpah silt loam, 1 to 2 percent slopesSrB432482343j5xgut62719711:24000
Skumpah-Xeric Haplogypsids complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes205253424244082mcsqut6281:24000
Skumpah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes48217384484024j7nput63419971:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SKUMPAH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .