Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SINTUF soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SINTUF, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SINTUF were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SINTUF soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SINTUF series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SINTUF series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SINTUF series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SINTUF share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SINTUF series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SINTUF series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SINTUF, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing SINTUF as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Wileyflat-Sintuf complex, 0 to 15 percent slopesQ1104976734320042mvfor6181:24000
Wileyflat-Egyptcreek-Sintuf complex, 5 to 50 percent slopesQ2102391334294742mvhor6181:24000
Tweener-Erakatak-Sintuf complex, 5 to 20 percent slopesP5402184734264191qkksor6181:24000
Egyptcreek-Sintuf-Wileyflat complex, 5 to 50 percent slopesQ2401745034320532mlxor6181:24000
Sintuf-Wileyflat, dry-Jushro complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesQ1301684134320572mv7or6181:24000
Sintuf-Ateron-Wileyflat complex, 0 to 10 percent slopesQ3701555934320902mvcor6181:24000
Egyptcreek-Sintuf-Rock outcrop association, 30 to 70 percent slopesC7101395634321812mv2or6181:24000
Combsflat-Drypok-Sintuf complex, 10 to 50 percent slopesT3B101296834346912mpdor6181:24000
Harveycreek, moist-Sintuf-Forbord complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1754CO126493426181130z9or6181:24000
Sintuf complex, 0 to 10 percent slopesQ3101089034321892mvdor6181:24000
Harveycreek, moist-Sintuf complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes1781BO107263426182130z8or6181:24000
Bigmow-Sintuf complex, 2 to 20 percent slopesN610873034321952mtzor6181:24000
Maucav-Sintuf complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes3438AO82723426191130zror6181:24000
Harveycreek-Sintuf-Anatone complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1780CO80393426165130z6or6181:24000
Harveycreek-Sintuf-Anatone complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes1779AO69433426186130z4or6181:24000
Sintuf-Ateron-Jushro complex, 0 to 20 percent slopesN780658934347412mv8or6181:24000
Sintuf-Maule, dry-Maule, moist complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesN672558134261801qkjlor6181:24000
Egyptcreek-Maule-Sintuf complex, 5 to 40 percent slopesQ450424434346592mv3or6181:24000
Ateron-Lambring-Sintuf complex, 5 to 20 percent slopesN790232734375851qkk1or6181:24000
Maucav-Yawkey-Sintuf complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3440CO22653426146134ghor6181:24000
Sintuf-Canest-Anatone complex, 0 to 10 percent slopesP400193734375602mvbor6181:24000
Harveycreek-Sintuf complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes1787AO15803437497130z7or6181:24000
Sintuf-Wileyflat-Maule complex, 2 to 15 percent slopesN78331934347951qkjror6181:24000
Wileyflat-Egyptcreek-Sintuf complex, 5 to 50 percent slopes4304NO114833853882mvhor62620181:24000
Tweener-Erakatak-Sintuf complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes4303NO78233853871qkksor62620181:24000
Tweener-Erakatak-Sintuf complex, 5 to 20 percent slopesP540185134264131qkksor6271:24000
Wileyflat-Egyptcreek-Sintuf complex, 5 to 50 percent slopesQ210150134294642mvhor6271:24000
Wileyflat-Sintuf complex, 0 to 15 percent slopesQ11055434320592mvfor6271:24000
Sintuf-Wileyflat, dry-Jushro complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesQ13023634321152mv7or6271:24000
Bigmow-Sintuf complex, 2 to 20 percent slopesN6108534321982mtzor6271:24000
Egyptcreek-Maule-Sintuf complex, 5 to 40 percent slopesQ450134346642mv3or6271:24000
Harveycreek-Sintuf-Anatone complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1780CO693424793130z6or6771:24000
Maucav-Yawkey-Sintuf complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3440CO313424701134ghor6771:24000
Sintuf-Maule, dry-Maule, moist complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesN672434248401qkjlor6771:24000
Harveycreek, moist-Sintuf-Forbord complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1754CO23424842130z9or6771:24000
Harveycreek, moist-Sintuf complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes1781BO23424860130z8or6771:24000
Harveycreek-Sintuf-Anatone complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes1779AO13424866130z4or6771:24000
Maucav-Sintuf complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes3438AO13424872130zror6771:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SINTUF soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .