Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SINNIGAM soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SINNIGAM, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SINNIGAM were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
4491P094791MT093008Sinnigam5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.996666,-112.7297211
5484ND04116884ND041168Sinnigam4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.3694444,-102.5227778
5492P015491ND007001Sinnigam6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.1824569702148,-103.221977233887
n/a92P015891ND089001Sinnigam6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SINNIGAM soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SINNIGAM series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SINNIGAM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SINNIGAM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SINNIGAM share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SINNIGAM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SINNIGAM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SINNIGAM, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing SINNIGAM as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Borky-Sinnigam very stony loams, 2 to 15 percent slopes2617325342501chdfmt02719791:24000
Borky-Sinnigam channery clay loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes252995342490chd2mt02719791:24000
Borky-Sinnigam very stony clay loams, 2 to 15 percent slopes296D1039344561ckjwmt06519961:24000
Sinnigam channery clay loam, moderately steepSN16618347144cn76mt61119711:24000
Sinnigam channery clay loam, slopingSM7762347143cn75mt61119711:24000
Absarokee-Sinnigam clay loams, 4 to 8 percent slopesAk7642347027cn3fmt61119711:24000
Absarokee-Sinnigam clay loams, 8 to 15 percent slopesAm4080347028cn3gmt61119711:24000
Castner-Sinnigam complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes3821262341921cgsqmt61319751:24000
Borky-Sinnigam very stony loams, 2 to 15 percent slopes3219222341915cgsjmt61319751:24000
Absarokee-Sinnigam complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes88408341967cgv6mt61319751:24000
Sinnigam loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes1825583341848cgqcmt61319751:24000
Regent-Sinnigam complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes780E31341479084yx7mt63019911:24000
Sinnigam-Regent complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes779E30951479064yx5mt63019911:24000
Shanley-Wickes, bouldery-Sinnigam, very bouldery complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes680E160124797202p7bzmt63720141:24000
Absarokee-Sinnigam complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes470B281780799v6h2mt63720141:24000
Sinnigam-Wayden complex, moist, 15 to 45 percent slopes336E238014989350z8mt63920001:24000
Absarokee-Sinnigam complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes527420348182cp9pmt65519751:24000
Absarokee-Sinnigam clay loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes425447348171cp9bmt65519751:24000
Absarokee-Sinnigam clay loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes319452348160cp8zmt65519751:24000
Sawicki-Sinnigam, very cobbly loam-Bachus, cobbly loam complex, cool, 15 to 45 percent slopes5644E3292699349rgqnmt6691:24000
Sinnigam-Janesburg complex, 3 to 25 percent slopes, very stonyE0303E667827556312qz6znd00119831:20000
Sinnigam-Janesburg loams, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0303B104427556302qz6ynd00119831:20000
Sinnigam-Janesburg complex, 3 to 25 percent slopes, very stonyE0303E1927584432qz6znd01119691:20000
Sinnigam-Janesburg loams, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0303B107025258512qz6ynd03719851:20000
Sinnigam-Janesburg complex, 3 to 25 percent slopes, very stonyE0303E40125258522qz6znd03719851:20000
Sinnigam-Janesburg complex, 3 to 25 percent slopes, very stonyE0303E120525257782qz6znd04119861:20000
Sinnigam-Janesburg loams, 0 to 6 percent slopesE0303B27925257772qz6ynd04119861:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SINNIGAM soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .