Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SIMONTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SIMONTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SIMONTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
1088P032688ID025025Simonton6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.3655548,-114.6705551
1088P032788ID025100Simonton6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.3652763,-114.5774994
1040A4238S1975ID025008Simonton7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.3268356,-114.7525787
43B79P0007S1978ID039002SIMONTON6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.4652786,-115.3847198
43B79P0010S1978ID039005SIMONTON6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.4208336,-115.3458328

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SIMONTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SIMONTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SIMONTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SIMONTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SIMONTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SIMONTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SIMONTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SIMONTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. ID-2010-08-31-17 | Wood River Area, Gooding County and Parts of Blaine, Lincoln, and Minidoka Counties - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in general soil map unit 17 (Soil Survey of Wood River Area, Idaho; 2005).

Map Units

Map units containing SIMONTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Simonton loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes5131902818072r3yid67319771:24000
Simonton loam, 4 to 12 percent slopes527025818082r3zid67319771:24000
Simonton loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes534960818092r40id67319771:24000
Rands-Simonton complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes443164817992r3pid67319771:24000
Simonton-Thacker, dry complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes322685484850j8jbid67719841:24000
Thacker-Simonton complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes402249484859j8jmid67719841:24000
Thacker-Simonton complex, 4 to 10 percent slopes411922484860j8jnid67719841:24000
Simonton-Bluecreek complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes311836484849j8j9id67719841:24000
Simonton-Thacker, dry complex, 4 to 10 percent slopes33768484851j8jcid67719841:24000
Simonton sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes30632484848j8j8id67719841:24000
Peevywell-Simonton complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes886726793782nllid68019851:24000
Simonton-Bauscher complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes1042285792852nhlid68019851:24000
Peevywell-Simonton loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes871862793772nlkid68019851:24000
Simonton loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes1021630792832nhjid68019851:24000
Simonton loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes103710792842nhkid68019851:24000
Elkcreek-Mulshoe-Simonton complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes512895820452rcmid68119931:24000
Simonton loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes1682055819012r6zid68119931:24000
Simonton-Fergie-Willho complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes1691460819022r70id68119931:24000
Mulshoe-Simonton-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes1341380818642r5sid68119931:24000
Elkcreek-Mulshoe-Simonton complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes521240820562rczid68119931:24000
Simonton-Bauscher loams, 2 to 20 percent slopes1502912925195102qynid68520121:24000
Gaib-Elkcreek-Simonton association, 20 to 60 percent slopes632050425195882r15id68520121:24000
Simonton loam, 2 to 12 percent slopes1491718225195082qylid68520121:24000
Simonton-Elkcreek complex, 10 to 50 percent slopes1511273425195112qypid68520121:24000
Elkcreek-Gaib-Simonton complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes581089325195822r0zid68520121:24000
Gaib-Simonton-Rock outcrop association, 2 to 12 percent slopes64284825195892r16id68520121:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SIMONTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .