Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SIMAS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SIMAS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SIMAS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
1074C01701974OR023002Simas6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.4508324,-119.4049988
1098P024397ORGCAO011Simas7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.451339,-119.406113
1074C0164S1974OR065001SIMAS7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.9217758,-120.5222244
1099P0237S1998OR069002SIMAS7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.9152794,-120.4397202

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SIMAS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SIMAS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SIMAS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SIMAS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SIMAS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SIMAS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SIMAS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SIMAS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing SIMAS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Simas very stony silt loam, 7 to 40 percent slopes43E26566109521ktor02119781:24000
Hyall-Simas association, 12 to 35 percent slopes79D86906226422sjor60419881:24000
Hyall-Simas association, 35 to 60 percent slopes80E47956226722smor60419881:24000
Simas-Sorf complex, 12 to 30 percent south slopes0701611534320892ms1or6181:24000
Sorf-Simas complex, 30 to 60 percent south slopes111679134346872mrsor6181:24000
Day-Simas complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes047280834350232mqhor6181:24000
Simas silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes117Cm27134347382mnnor6181:24000
Simas-Ruckles-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 80 percent north slopes120F85656342323zxor62019921:24000
Simas-Ruckles-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 80 percent south slopes121F74346342423zyor62019921:24000
Simas-Ruckles complex, 15 to 40 percent south slopes119D39266341723zqor62019921:24000
Simas-Ruckles complex, 15 to 40 percent north slopes118D26056341523znor62019921:24000
Simas silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes117C14756341323zlor62019921:24000
Drinkwater-Simas complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes159C15883425024nk4yor6271:24000
Simas cobbly clay loam, 2 to 20 percent slopes121C12663425054nfpnor6271:24000
Simas-Barbermill-Badland complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes188C10963425159t73wor6271:24000
Simas-Barbermill-Badland complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes188E5403432025t73xor6271:24000
Gooserock-Drinkwater-Simas complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes105E5353425112nfp2or6271:24000
Simas-Barbermill-Badland complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes112E4983425060t6sjor6271:24000
Simas cobbly clay loam, 15 to 30 percent north slopes121D3713425080nfppor6271:24000
Simas-Brisbois-Badland complex, 30 to 60 percent north slopes148E2773425110nk4por6271:24000
Simas-Gooserock complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes145E2053425020nfq5or6271:24000
Simas-Brisbois-Badland complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes148C185342502526j4or6271:24000
Simas-Brisbois-Badland complex, 15 to 30 percent north slopes148D1693425061nfq9or6271:24000
Brisbois-Badland-Simas complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes149E1063425178nfqbor6271:24000
Simas-Day complex, 15 to 40 percent north slopes358D673425037269lor6271:24000
Simas cobbly clay loam, 20 to 50 percent north slopes121E503434632nk4mor6271:24000
Drinkwater-Simas complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes159D1234250481hh6gor6271:24000
Simas cobbly silty clay loam, 10 to 35 percent slopesSlE777006291823gmor66619701:31680
Simas very stony clay loam, 35 to 70 percent slopesSmF406006291923gnor66619701:31680
Simas soils, 8 to 40 percent slopesSnE197006292023gpor66619701:31680
Simas-Antoken complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes12680886309723ndor67419931:24000
Simas-Ruckles-Antoken complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes12776266309923ngor67419931:24000
Sorf-Simas complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes13547686311623p0or67419931:24000
Ruckles-Simas-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes11840166308123mwor67419931:24000
Ruckles-Simas complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes11723806307923mtor67419931:24000
Simas-Ruckles-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 40 percent south slopes356D197343421692269kor6771:24000
Simas-Sorf complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes263E10651338498626d5or6771:24000
Simas-Ruckles-Twickenham complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes310C77003421708268jor6771:24000
Simas-Gooserock complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes145E52153421743nfq5or6771:24000
Simas-Cooperopolis complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes355E41203421773269for6771:24000
Drinkwater-Simas complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes159C34633421778nk4yor6771:24000
Simas-Brisbois-Badland complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes148C3163342178026j4or6771:24000
Twickenham-Simas complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes309D30903421785nfqnor6771:24000
Simas-Day complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes358C25303421814269mor6771:24000
Simas-Day complex, 15 to 40 percent north slopes358D19463421862269lor6771:24000
Simas complex, 15 to 40 percent north slopes310D15503421911268lor6771:24000
Simas-Day complex, 15 to 40 percent south slopes359D14953421915269sor6771:24000
Drinkwater-Simas complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes159D140334219191hh6gor6771:24000
Simas cobbly clay loam, 2 to 20 percent slopes121C12493421949nfpnor6771:24000
Simas-Barbermill-Badland complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes112E9413421977t6sjor6771:24000
Simas-Brisbois-Badland complex, 15 to 30 percent north slopes148D9343421991nfq9or6771:24000
Simas-Badland complex, 15 to 40 percent north slopes349D68134244602694or6771:24000
Twickenham-Simas-Sorf complex, 15 to 40 percent south slopes322D65534244742kkwyor6771:24000
Simas-Brisbois-Badland complex, 30 to 60 percent north slopes148E4653424540nk4por6771:24000
Gooserock-Drinkwater-Simas complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes105E4573424542nfp2or6771:24000
Simas cobbly clay loam, 15 to 30 percent north slopes121D4443424515nfppor6771:24000
Simas-Turtlesprings-Brisbois complex, 8 to 40 percent slopes315C23934246772wj6nor6771:24000
Day-Simas complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes357A1473424749269nor6771:24000
Simas-Barbermill-Badland complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes188C1313424766t73wor6771:24000
Brisbois-Badland-Simas complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes149E563424819nfqbor6771:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SIMAS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .