Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SILOAM soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SILOAM, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SILOAM were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
13697P038396NC169002Siloam5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.2991676,-80.4377747
13697P038596NC171002Siloam5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.4641685,-80.6922226
13697P038696NC171003Siloam5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.3027763,-80.5719452
13697P038996NC171006Siloam6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.292778,-80.6397247

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SILOAM soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SILOAM series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SILOAM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SILOAM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SILOAM share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SILOAM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SILOAM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SILOAM, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing SILOAM as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Siloam-Zion complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesSzE9624328412mnkrnc05719851:24000
Siloam-Zion complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesSzD2324328402mnkqnc05719851:24000
Siloam-Zion complex, 25 to 45 percent slopesSzF1624328432mnktnc05719851:24000
Siloam-Zion complex, 2 to 8 percent slopesSzB1224328392mnkpnc05719851:24000
Siloam sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesSmF802924338132mpl3nc06719701:15840
Siloam sandy loam, 4 to 10 percent slopesSmC255224338112mpl1nc06719701:15840
Siloam sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesSmD235524338122mpl2nc06719701:15840
Siloam sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesSmE130024334472mp69nc08119751:20000
Siloam sandy loam, 4 to 10 percent slopesSmC42824334452mp67nc08119751:20000
Siloam sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesSmD36124334492mp6cnc08119751:20000
Siloam loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesSmF1180824393212mw9snc14519871:24000
Siloam loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesSmD568624393202mw9rnc14519871:24000
Siloam loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesSmB287424393192mw9qnc14519871:24000
Siloam sandy loam, 10 to 45 percent slopesSmF1133423902382l77gnc15719831:24000
Siloam sandy loam, 4 to 10 percent slopesSmC726423899832l6z7nc15719831:24000
Fairview-Siloam complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedFsD2675023884622l5d5nc16919921:24000
Fairview-Siloam complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedFsC2482923884612l5d4nc16919921:24000
Siloam fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesSfC259423890282l5zfnc16919921:24000
Siloam fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesSfD215223890332l5zlnc16919921:24000
Zion-Siloam complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesZwC110523890252l5zbnc16919921:24000
Fairview-Siloam complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedFrC2109712753648q2nc17120051:24000
Fairview-Siloam complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedFrD292214276221jxkbnc17120051:24000
Siloam-Zion complex, 15 to 45 percent slopesSrE44314276971jxmrnc17120051:24000
Siloam-Zion complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesSrC41912754748qfnc17120051:24000
Siloam sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesSmE322323982612lhl8nc19719601:15840
Siloam sandy loam, 25 to 50 percent slopesSmF120923982632lhlbnc19719601:15840
Siloam sandy loam, 2 to 10 percent slopesSmC99923982582lhl5nc19719601:15840
Siloam sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesSmD81323982602lhl7nc19719601:15840
Siloam-Zion complex, 10 to 15 percent slopesSoD35523982082lhjknc19719601:15840
Siloam sandy loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes, severely erodedSmE332323982622lhl9nc19719601:15840
Siloam-Zion complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedSoD222223982092lhjlnc19719601:15840
Siloam sandy loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes, severely erodedSmC38923982592lhl6nc19719601:15840
Oak Level-Siloam complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes30C3928024794272p71jva02920101:24000
Oak Level-Siloam complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes30D708424794282p71kva02920101:24000
Oak Level-Siloam complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes29C66515874301q8vfva04920051:24000
Oak Level-Siloam complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes29D22215874311q8vgva04920051:24000
Siloam-Bluemount complex, 45 to 75 percent slopes, stony, rocky34F393582039mjngva06720041:24000
Siloam sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesWkD9051199432zhh9va13719661:15840
Siloam sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopesWkC7601199422zhh8va13719661:15840
Siloam gravelly fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes43D26581200132yztdva14319891:24000
Siloam gravelly fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes43C15871200122yztcva14319891:24000
Siloam gravelly fine sandy loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes43E8841200142yztfva14319891:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SILOAM soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .