Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SIDELING soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SIDELING, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SIDELING were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SIDELING soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SIDELING series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SIDELING series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SIDELING series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SIDELING share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SIDELING series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SIDELING series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SIDELING, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MD-2010-09-07-09 | Washington County - 2003

    Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Murrill-Dryrun general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Washington County, Maryland; 2003).

  2. MD-2010-09-07-10 | Washington County - 2003

    Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Dekalb-Sideling-Hazleton general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Washington County, Maryland; 2003).

  3. MD-2012-02-03-28 | Washington County - 2003

    Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Murrill-Dryrun general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Washington County, Maryland; 2003).

  4. MD-2012-02-03-29 | Washington County - 2003

    Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Dekalb-Sideling-Hazleton general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Washington County, Maryland; 2003).

  5. PA-2010-09-30-15 | Fulton County - 2004

    Relationship of soils to topography and the underlying material in the Hazleton-Sideling-Dekalb general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Fulton County, Pennsylvania; 2004).

Map Units

Map units containing SIDELING as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Sideling gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very stonySsD476624012462llpkmd00120091:12000
Sideling gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very stonySsC261924012452llpjmd00120091:12000
Sideling gravelly loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes, very stonySsE101924012472llplmd00120091:12000
Sideling gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, very stonySsB31524012442llphmd00120091:12000
Sideling-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesSuC28224010502llh7md00120091:12000
Sideling-Urban land complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesSuD10824010512llh8md00120091:12000
Sideling-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesSuB8024010492llh6md00120091:12000
Sideling gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, extremely stonySgD3049534668kyccmd04319981:12000
Sideling gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stonySgC1615534666kyc9md04319981:12000
Sideling gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesSdC1367534660kyc3md04319981:12000
Sideling gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesSdB641534659kyc2md04319981:12000
Sideling gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesSdD385534661kyc4md04319981:12000
Sideling gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stonySgB162534664kyc7md04319981:12000
Sideling gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesSeC2712906rxtzpa04119801:15840
Sideling gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesSeB2712905rxtypa04119801:15840
Sideling gravelly loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes, extremely stonySrD23707545199l9b2pa05519991:24000
Sideling and Hazleton soils 25 to 60 percent slopes, extremely stonySSF13430545195l99ypa05519991:24000
Sideling gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesSeC4334545197l9b0pa05519991:24000
Sideling gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesSeB3139545196l99zpa05519991:24000
Sideling gravelly loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stonySrB1292545198l9b1pa05519991:24000
Sideling and Hazleton soils 25 to 60 percent slopes, extremely stonySSF11645544929l91cpa05719991:24000
Sideling gravelly loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes, extremely stonySrD8920544934l91jpa05719991:24000
Sideling gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesSeC924544931l91fpa05719991:24000
Sideling gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesSeD675544932l91gpa05719991:24000
Sideling gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesSeB335544930l91dpa05719991:24000
Sideling gravelly loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stonySrB272544933l91hpa05719991:24000
Sideling gravelly loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes, extremely stonySrD819696119rccgpa09919801:15840
Sideling and Hazleton soils 25 to 60 percent slopes, extremely stonySSF69696120rcchpa09919801:15840
Sideling gravelly loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, extremely stonySxE9176555702ln7wwv06520031:24000
Sideling gravelly loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, rubblySyE1614555703ln7xwv06520031:24000
Sideling gravelly loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stonySxC1323555701ln7vwv06520031:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SIDELING soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .