Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SHOTTOWER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SHOTTOWER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SHOTTOWER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
12804N1172S2004VA121002Shottower7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.2003326,-80.5873642
n/a04N1171S2004VA121001Shottower7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SHOTTOWER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SHOTTOWER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SHOTTOWER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SHOTTOWER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SHOTTOWER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SHOTTOWER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SHOTTOWER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SHOTTOWER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. VA-2012-05-11-15 | Washington County Area and the City of Bristol - 2006

    A sequence of landforms along the Holston River in Washington County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Washington County Area and the City of Bristol, Virginia; 2006).

Map Units

Map units containing SHOTTOWER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Shottower loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes50C16525191192t3g5va02319901:20000
Shottower cobbly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes51D1649519121kf5vva02319901:20000
Shottower loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes50B6245191182t3g4va02319901:20000
Shottower cobbly loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes51C495519120kf5tva02319901:20000
Shottower silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes28C2551521707khw8va10519971:24000
Shottower silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes28B845521706khw7va10519971:24000
Shottower silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes28D638521708khw9va10519971:24000
Shottower-Urban land complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes41C2251520305kgf1va16119901:24000
Shottower loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes39C8195202982t3g5va16119901:24000
Shottower cobbly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes40D446520304kgf0va16119901:24000
Shottower loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes39B3475202972t3g4va16119901:24000
Shottower-Urban land complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes41D256520306kgf2va16119901:24000
Shottower cobbly loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes40C213520303kgdzva16119901:24000
Shottower fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes58C477725148462qdcrva16320101:24000
Shottower fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes58D266225148472qdcsva16320101:24000
Shottower fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes58B200025148452qdcqva16320101:24000
Shottower cobbly fine sandy loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes59E158925148482qdctva16320101:24000
Shottower-Urban land complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes60C37625148492qdcxva16320101:24000
Shottower loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes39C6897780962t3g5va16920031:24000
Shottower loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes32C18435187162t3g5va17319951:24000
Shottower loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes32B7785187152t3g4va17319951:24000
Shottower loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes32D5455187172t3g6va17319951:24000
Shottower loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes37C17185193482t3g5va19119981:15840
Shottower loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes37D7715193492t3g6va19119981:15840
Shottower loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes37B2085193472t3g4va19119981:15840
Shottower loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes25D56535189382t3g6va19719881:15840
Shottower loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes25C53875189372t3g5va19719881:15840
Shottower loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes25B19855189362t3g4va19719881:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SHOTTOWER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .