Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SHELMADINE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SHELMADINE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SHELMADINE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14759PA0370021959PA037002Shelmadine5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.1183333,-76.4588889
14759PA0370061959PA037006Shelmadine5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.1258333,-76.4338889
14778PA0810481978PA081048Shelmadine5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.2369444,-77.1416667
14778PA0810491978PA081049Shelmadine5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.2205556,-77.1680556
14788PA0250331988PA025033Shelmadine4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.9,-75.8044444

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SHELMADINE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SHELMADINE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SHELMADINE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SHELMADINE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SHELMADINE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SHELMADINE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SHELMADINE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SHELMADINE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. PA-2012-03-13-57 | Lycoming County - November 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Weikert-Berks-Hartleton association (Soil Survey of Lycoming County, PA; 1986).

  2. PA-2012-03-13-59 | Lycoming County - November 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Dekalb-Laidig-Buchanan association (Soil Survey of Lycoming County, PA; 1986).

  3. PA-2012-03-13-69 | Monroe County - August 1981

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Dekalb-Hazleton-Laidig map unit (Soil Survey of Monroe County, PA; 1981).

  4. PA-2012-03-13-75 | Montour County - April 1985

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Weikert-Berks-Hartleton association (Soil Survey of Montour County, PA; 1985).

  5. PA-2012-03-14-05 | Northumberland County - March 1985

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Weikert-Berks-Hartleton association (Soil Survey of Northumberland County, PA; 1985).

  6. PA-2012-03-14-07 | Northumberland County - March 1985

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Watson-Alvira-Allenwood association (Soil Survey of Northumberland County, PA; 1985).

  7. PA-2012-03-14-10 | Snyder County - April 1985

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Weikert-Hartleton association (Soil Survey of Snyder County, PA; 1985).

  8. PA-2012-03-14-11 | Snyder County - April 1985

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Alvira-Watson-Allenwood association (Soil Survey of Snyder County, PA; 1985).

  9. PA-2012-03-14-23 | Union County - March 1985

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Allenwood-Alvira-Shelmadine association (Soil Survey of Union County, PA; 1985).

  10. PA-2012-03-14-31 | Warren and Forest Counties - October 1985

    Typical landscape and underlying material of the Hanover-Alvira-Shelmadine map unit (Soil Survey of Warren and Forest Counties, PA; 1985).

Map Units

Map units containing SHELMADINE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Shelmadine very stony silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesSmB3205539408l398pa02519601:20000
Alvira and Shelmadine very stony silt loams, 0 to 8 percent slopesAtB1489539297l35ppa02519601:20000
Alvira and Shelmadine silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopesAsA1162539295l35mpa02519601:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesShA980539406l396pa02519601:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedShB2282539407l397pa02519601:20000
Alvira and Shelmadine silt loams, 3 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedAsB2211539296l35npa02519601:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedSdB24366539553l3fypa03719651:20000
Shelmadine very stony silt loamSh1232539554l3fzpa03719651:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesSdA1104539552l3fxpa03719651:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesSmB7852961949y6npa03919731:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesSmA7292961939y6mpa03919731:20000
Shelmadine very stony silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesSkB12482964829yhypa07919741:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesShA2802964819yhxpa07919741:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesShA2373539115l2ztpa08119811:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesShB890539116l2zvpa08119811:20000
Shelmadine very stony silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesSvB688539117l2zwpa08119811:20000
Shelmadine very stony silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesSpB7672963579ycxpa08919751:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesSmA5092963569ycwpa08919751:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesShA1541539021l2wspa09319801:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesShB225539022l2wtpa09319801:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesShA1904539666l3klpa09719801:20000
Shelmadine very stony silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesSmB1029539668l3knpa09719801:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesShB907539667l3kmpa09719801:20000
Shelmadine channery silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stonySlC30929990322x4wqpa10519531:24000
Shelmadine channery silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopesShC5129990332x4wrpa10519531:24000
Shelmadine silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesShA1514539752l3ncpa10719771:20000
Shelmadine very stony silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesSmB1369539754l3nfpa10719771:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesShB882539753l3ndpa10719771:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesShA2770540844l4slpa10919801:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesShB2297540845l4smpa10919801:20000
Shelmadine very stony silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesSmB1458540846l4snpa10919801:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesShB2653540945l4wvpa11919801:20000
Shelmadine very stony silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesSmB1996540946l4wwpa11919801:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesShA1904540944l4wtpa11919801:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 3 to 15 percent slopesShC8217539262l34kpa60919791:20000
Shelmadine silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stonySvC3033539263l34lpa60919791:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SHELMADINE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .