Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SHEEPSCOT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SHEEPSCOT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SHEEPSCOT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14310N0319S09ME021003.SheepscotSheepscot6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.7929722,-69.2485
14310N0311S2009ME003007Sheepscot6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.8086389,-69.5206111

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SHEEPSCOT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SHEEPSCOT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SHEEPSCOT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SHEEPSCOT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SHEEPSCOT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SHEEPSCOT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SHEEPSCOT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SHEEPSCOT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. ME-2010-09-03-06 | Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County - 2003

    Typical pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Colton-Sheepscot-Markey general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County, Maine; 2003).

Map Units

Map units containing SHEEPSCOT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Sheepscot fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes286B189744101sz98ma01120121:12000
Sheepscot fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesStB34002847369k91me60119831:20000
Colton-Sheepscot association, rollingCTC55822849809kjxme61019921:20000
Masardis-Sheepscot complex, 0 to 15 percent slopesMLC38672850232x1dcme61019921:20000
Colton-Adams-Sheepscot association, 0 to 15 percent slopesCSC74512850862x1cgme61119881:20000
Sheepscot sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesSmB44662851459kq7me61119881:20000
Sheepscot sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, very stonySoB35902851469kq8me61119881:20000
Sheepscot-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesSrB14202851489kqbme61119881:20000
Sheepscot sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very stonySoC7812851479kq9me61119881:20000
Sheepscot-Croghan-Kinsman complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesSJB100162856169l6fme61720041:24000
Masardis-Sheepscot complex, 0 to 15 percent slopesMSC54242855962x1dcme61720041:24000
Sheepscot fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesShB19762856219l6lme61720041:24000
Masardis-Sheepscot complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesMSB208625498932x1ddme62020111:24000
Masardis-Sheepscot complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesMSB118525498412x1ddme62120111:24000
Colton-Adams-Sheepscot association, 0 to 15 percent slopesCTC75119092232x1cgme62220071:24000
Masardis-Sheepscot complex, 0 to 15 percent slopesMPC22019091802x1dcme62220071:24000
Sheepscot-Croghan-Kinsman complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesSPB771909077222k4me62220071:24000
Sheepscot sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes14B11122796099cynnh00519851:20000
Sheepscot cobbly very fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes14B60292806769f22nh60720001:24000
Sheepscot gravelly fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes11B5082828219h98vt00520061:20000
Sheepscot gravelly fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes11A2342828209h97vt00520061:20000
Sheepscot gravelly fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes11B90614010161j0w2vt00920121:
Sheepscot gravelly fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes11A5414010151j0w1vt00920121:
Sheepscot gravelly fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes31B12442834579hysvt01920051:20000
Sheepscot gravelly fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes31A6462834569hyrvt01920051:20000
Sheepscot fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes123B18382821329gl1vt02119851:20000
Sheepscot fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes123C13482821339gl2vt02119851:20000
Sheepscot fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes52B16942820389gh0vt02519841:20000
Sheepscot fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes52A3572820379ggzvt02519841:20000
Croghan and Sheepscot soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes71B30872832822wqnxvt02720001:20000
Croghan and Sheepscot soils, 8 to 15 percent slopes71C3682832832wqnyvt02720001:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SHEEPSCOT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .