Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SHAVER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SHAVER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SHAVER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
22AUCD551000355-CA-10-003SHAVER1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.2361183,-119.2086563
22AUCD581000558-CA-10-005SHAVER2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.0315704,-119.1954346
22AUCD591001859-CA-10-018SHAVER3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.060379,-119.1410141
22A94P007893CA107003Shaver6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.9316368103027,-118.584259033203
22A40A3405S1977CA019011SHAVER4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.0750008,-119.1500015

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SHAVER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SHAVER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SHAVER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SHAVER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SHAVER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SHAVER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SHAVER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SHAVER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing SHAVER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Shaver coarse sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesSbD1813462280hj18ca62419681:20000
Shaver coarse sandy loam, 9 to 15 percent slopesSbC1648462279hj17ca62419681:20000
Shaver very rocky coarse sandy loam, 15 to 50 percentSdE1635462282hj1bca62419681:20000
Shaver rocky coarse sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopesScC462462281hj19ca62419681:20000
Shaver coarse sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopesSbB288462278hj16ca62419681:20000
Shaver very rocky coarse sandy loam, 51 to 71 percent slopesScF556462442hj6hca62819631:20000
Shaver very rocky coarse sandy loam, moderately deep, 51 to 71 percent slopesSdF214462443hj6jca62819631:20000
Shaver-Lithic Humixerepts-Holland complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes60551101335628730t4sca63020181:24000
Shaver-Holland-Chawanakee complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes6054775335628630t4qca63020181:24000
Shaver-Holland-Chawanakee complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes60549484335627530t4qca64919671:24000
Shaver-Lithic Humixerepts-Holland complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes60553743335627630t4sca64919671:24000
Shaver coarse sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesSmE218464455hl9fca65419661:24000
Shaver very rocky coarse sandy loam, 15 to 50 percent complexSdEec163515913041qdwdca72419851:24000
Shaver family, 35 to 65 percent slopes15717496465132hm08ca75019831:24000
Shaver family, 5 to 35 percent slopes15612267465131hm07ca75019831:24000
Shaver-Holland-Chawanakee complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes6054636335628230t4qca75019831:24000
Shaver-Lithic Humixerepts-Holland complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes6055231335628330t4sca75019831:24000
Shaver-Chaix association, moderately steep6604813465242hm3tca76019811:24000
Tollhouse variant-Shaver variant-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes1253929465162hm17ca76019811:24000
Shaver-Chaix association, steep6613698465243hm3vca76019811:24000
Holland-Shaver association, steep6852836465261hm4fca76019811:24000
Shaver-Holland association, moderately steep6511878465238hm3pca76019811:24000
Shaver-Chaix association, very steep6621861465244hm3wca76019811:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SHAVER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .