Soil Data Explorer - SHAVENAUGH

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SHAVENAUGH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SHAVENAUGH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SHAVENAUGH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
96	97P0135	S1996MI019004	Shavenaugh	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	44.6952782,-85.8927765
97	40A1916	S1975MI021012	Shavenaugh	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	42.0233611,-86.3944444
98	11N0158	S2010MI117006	Shavenaugh	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	43.1374167,-85.25925

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SHAVENAUGH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SHAVENAUGH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the SHAVENAUGH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the SHAVENAUGH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SHAVENAUGH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the SHAVENAUGH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the SHAVENAUGH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SHAVENAUGH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing SHAVENAUGH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Shavenaugh sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes	109B	9043	193360	6h6f	mi614	2005	1:12000
Boyer-Shavenaugh complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes	120B	2818	193509	6hc7	mi614	2005	1:12000
Spinks-Shavenaugh sands, 0 to 6 percent slopes	118B	2221	193503	6hc1	mi614	2005	1:12000
Shavenaugh sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes	109C	1920	193359	6h6d	mi614	2005	1:12000
Shavenaugh sand, 18 to 35 percent slopes	109E	1472	193357	6h6b	mi614	2005	1:12000
Shavenaugh sand, 12 to 18 percent slopes	109D	1044	193358	6h6c	mi614	2005	1:12000
Spinks-Shavenaugh sands, 6 to 12 percent slopes	118C	1016	193504	6hc2	mi614	2005	1:12000
Spinks-Shavenaugh sands, 12 to 18 percent slopes	118D	766	193505	6hc3	mi614	2005	1:12000
Boyer-Shavenaugh complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes	120C	694	193510	6hc8	mi614	2005	1:12000
Spinks-Shavenaugh sands, 18 to 35 percent slopes	118E	688	193506	6hc4	mi614	2005	1:12000
Spinks-Shavenaugh sands, 35 to 50 percent slopes	118F	335	193507	6hc5	mi614	2005	1:12000
Boyer-Shavenaugh complex, 12 to 18 percent slopes	120D	279	893251	yzhk	mi614	2005	1:12000
Boyer-Shavenaugh complex, 35 to 50 percent slopes	120F	274	894102	z0d0	mi614	2005	1:12000
Boyer-Shavenaugh complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes	120E	258	193511	6hc9	mi614	2005	1:12000
Shavenaugh sand, 35 to 50 percent slopes	109F	142	193356	6h69	mi614	2005	1:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SHAVENAUGH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).