Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SHACK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SHACK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SHACK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SHACK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SHACK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SHACK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SHACK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SHACK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SHACK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SHACK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SHACK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing SHACK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Minvale-Shack complex, 10 to 15 percent slopesMsD13036884422yp9rga01520131:12000
Minvale-Shack complex, 6 to 10 percent slopesMsC10740884424yp9tga01520131:12000
Minvale-Shack complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesMsE10183884425yp9vga01520131:12000
Minvale-Shack complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesMsB5297884423yp9sga01520131:12000
Minvale-Shack gravelly silt loams, 15 to 25 percent slopesMsE7830531194ktr9ga04719871:20000
Minvale-Shack gravelly silt loams, 6 to 10 percent slopesMsC6250531192ktr7ga04719871:20000
Minvale-Shack gravelly silt loams, 10 to 15 percent slopesMsD6110531193ktr8ga04719871:20000
Shack-Minvale gravelly silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesSmB1375531201ktrjga04719871:20000
Shack-Minvale complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesSbD12965202379525xxqga12920071:12000
Shack-Minvale complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesSbE8105202379625xxrga12920071:12000
Shack-Minvale complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesSbB2710202379425xxpga12920071:12000
Holston-Shack complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesHsB1615202381325xy9ga12920071:12000
Shack-Urban land complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesScD175202384625xzcga12920071:12000
Minvale-Shack complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesMnE22273531489kv1tga61920121:24000
Minvale-Shack complex, 6 to 10 percent slopesMnC17179531485kv1pga61920121:24000
Minvale-Shack complex 10 to 15 percent slopesMnD13926531487kv1rga61920121:24000
Minvale-Shack complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesMnB2919531483kv1mga61920121:24000
Shack cherty silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesShE28900531295ktvkga62119751:20000
Shack cherty silt loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesShD18900531294ktvjga62119751:20000
Shack cherty silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopesShC16920531293ktvhga62119751:20000
Shack cherty silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesShB4605531292ktvgga62119751:20000
Shack-Minvale-Bodine complex, 6 to 15 percent slopesSdD23905562782lwm8ga64820011:12000
Shack-Minvale-Bodine complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesSdE12355562784lwmbga64820011:12000
Shack gravelly silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesScB4520562781lwm7ga64820011:12000
Bodine-Shack complex, 5 to 25 percent slopesBsD272710178341354ctn06519801:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SHACK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .