Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SENSABAUGH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SENSABAUGH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SENSABAUGH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
12289KY-057-00889KY-057-008Sensabaugh4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.7561913,-85.2882767

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SENSABAUGH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SENSABAUGH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SENSABAUGH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SENSABAUGH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SENSABAUGH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SENSABAUGH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SENSABAUGH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SENSABAUGH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KY-2012-01-26-37 | Boyle and Mercer Counties - April 1983

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Trappist-McAfee-Colyer map unit (Soil Survey of Boyle and Mercer Counties, Kentucky; April 1983).

  2. KY-2012-01-27-01 | Bullitt and Spencer Counties - September 1986

    The relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Garmon-Crider general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Bullitt and Spencer Counties, Kentucky; September 1986).

  3. KY-2012-02-01-10 | Marion County - August 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Carpenter-Garmon-Rohan general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Marion County, Kentucky; August 1991).

  4. MO-2010-09-27-05 | Texas County -

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Bendavis-Hogcreek, Alred-Bardley-Lecoma, and Nolin-Sensabaugh-Skidmore associations (Soil Survey of Texas County, Missouri).

  5. WV-2010-11-08-02 | Clay County - 2005

    The typical pattern of soils and parent material in the northern part of the county (Soil Survey of Clay County, West Virginia; 2005).

  6. WV-2010-11-08-03 | Doddridge County - 2005

    Chagrin soil along Middle Island Creek. Also shown is the typical pattern of other soils and their underlying parent material in parts of Doddridge County (Soil Survey of Doddridge County, West Virginia; 2005).

  7. WV-2010-11-08-04 | Doddridge County - 2005

    The typical pattern of Gilpin, Peabody, and other soils and their underlying parent material. This pattern of soils is dominant in the county (Soil Survey of Doddridge County, West Virginia; 2005).

  8. WV-2010-11-08-06 | Jackson and Mason Counties -

    The typical pattern of upland soils and parent materials that are dominant throughout the survey area (Soil Survey of Jackson and Mason Counties, West Virginia).

  9. WV-2012-03-23-03 | Boone County - June 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Dekalb general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Boone County, WV; 1994).

  10. WV-2012-03-23-05 | Pleasants and Tyler Counties - July 1989

    Typical relationship of soils, landscapes, and underlying parent materials in Chagrin-Wheeling-Urban land general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Pleasants and Tyler Counties, WV; 1989).

  11. WV-2012-03-23-06 | Pleasants and Tyler Counties - July 1989

    Typical relationship of soils, landscapes, and underlying parent materials in Otwell-Gallia-Hackers general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Pleasants and Tyler Counties, WV; 1989).

Map Units

Map units containing SENSABAUGH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Sensabaugh gravelly loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSe3720551472lhvfky05719911:20000
Sensabaugh gravelly loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesSgB1670551473lhvgky05719911:20000
Sensabaugh gravelly silt loam, frequently floodedSe2125552370ljsdky15519861:20000
Huntington gravelly silt loam (sensabaugh)Hg2989549767lg2fky16919651:15840
Sensabaugh gravelly silt loamSe2790549914lg75ky17119771:20000
Huntington silt loam, gravelly variant (sensabaugh)Hv1150549970lg8zky17919671:15840
Chagrin gravelly silty clay loam (sensabaugh 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded)Cg1045552025ljf8ky60319681:15840
Sensabaugh gravelly silt loamSe1534551561lhy9ky60619791:20000
Sensabaugh gravelly loam, occasionally floodedSg4304551014lhcnky60819831:20000
Sensabaugh gravelly silt loamSe1940552577lk02ky62019791:20000
Sensabaugh silt loamSg4165551072lhfjky62119751:20000
Robinsonville gravelly silt loam (sensabaugh)Rg504324530052nbk6ky64619661:15840
Sensabaugh silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded67075212225754622r0cmmo18319791:24000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded67555185925754752r0cymo18319791:24000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded6610527425337772qp9vmo18319791:24000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded675556225754762r0cymo21919751:24000
Sensabaugh gravelly loam, 2 to 12 percent slopesSnC2185250692zvlxtn05919541:15840
Sensabaugh loamSb1013528418kqvrtn17119801:24000
Sensabaugh gravelly loamSa4015528602kr1ptn60219731:15840
Sensabaugh-Lobdell-Derroc complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded57A212125148432qdcnva16320101:24000
Sensabaugh-Lobdell loams, 2 to 8 percent slopesSeB4705514868k8rnwv00519881:24000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedSrB34105130682w1w4wv00719901:24000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSoA31905130672w1w3wv00719901:24000
Sensabaugh-Vandalia-Urban land complex, 3 to 15 percent slopesSvC3340513680k7jbwv01119841:20000
Sensabaugh loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSoA32505136782w1w5wv01119841:20000
Sensabaugh loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedSrB28005136792w1w6wv01119841:20000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSs20145161082w1w3wv01519981:24000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSe68885617442w1w3wv01720011:24000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedSeB56575617522w1w4wv01720011:24000
Sensabaugh-Urban land complexSu219553397lkvjwv01720011:24000
Sensabaugh-Urban land complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedSuB72561753lvk2wv01720011:24000
Sensabaugh loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSb100515149122w1w5wv02119951:24000
Sensabaugh loamSe1282553074lkj3wv02520021:24000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSn60495128612w1w3wv03919761:20000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSu34635148202w1w3wv04119891:20000
Sensabaugh loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedSfB23105533302w1w6wv04320051:24000
Sensabaugh loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSeA5185533292w1w5wv04320051:24000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedSfB19807493582w1w4wv05120071:12000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSeA16507493572w1w3wv05120071:12000
Sensabaugh-Urban land complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedShB243749355t4rrwv05120071:12000
Sensabaugh-Urban land complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSgA111749351t4rmwv05120071:12000
Sensabaugh silt loamSe2760515438k9c1wv07519921:24000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSn57025131842w1w3wv07919811:20000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedSrB15535131852w1w4wv07919811:20000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSn110715132992w1w3wv08519801:20000
Sensabaugh loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSnA1549413841462w1w5wv60020051:24000
Sensabaugh loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedSrB479313842092w1w6wv60020051:24000
Sensabaugh loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSs49725146262w1w5wv60119661:15840
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSn128715147102w1w3wv61219841:20000
Sensabaugh-Lobdell loams, 2 to 8 percent slopesSeB4985115556017sg4wv62020051:24000
Sensabaugh loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesSbB10115555917sg3wv62020051:24000
Sensabaugh silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedSs179955151942w1w3wv62419931:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SENSABAUGH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .