Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SEARSPORT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SEARSPORT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SEARSPORT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14310N0312S2009ME003008Searsport6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.8981111,-69.5695833

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SEARSPORT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SEARSPORT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SEARSPORT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SEARSPORT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SEARSPORT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SEARSPORT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SEARSPORT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SEARSPORT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. ME-2010-09-03-05 | Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County - 2003

    Typical pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Adams-Croghan-Naumburg general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County, Maine; 2003).

  2. ME-2010-09-03-06 | Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County - 2003

    Typical pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Colton-Sheepscot-Markey general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County, Maine; 2003).

  3. ME-2012-02-03-10 | Oxford County Area - March 1995

    Typical pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Adams-Croghan-Colton general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Oxford County Area, Maine; March 1995).

  4. NH-2012-02-14-16 | Hillsborough County, Western Part - October 1985

    Typical landscape pattern of soils and parent material in the Colton-Adams-Naumburg association (Soil Survey of Hillsborough County, New Hampshire, Western Part; October 1985).

Map Units

Map units containing SEARSPORT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Searsport loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes28A1403808462w48fma61419931:25000
Wonsqueak and Searsport soilsWS237315835bln7me00519691:24000
Searsport muckSe27315813blmjme00519691:24000
Searsport mucky peatSe10712845849k44me02719791:20000
Searsport mucky peatSp13382847359k90me60119831:20000
Naumburg-Searsport associationNS60592850429klxme61019921:20000
Wonsqueak and Searsport soilsWS53482858489lfxme61319871:20000
Searsport muckSe8752858309lfbme61319871:20000
Kinsman-Searsport association, 0 to 3 percent slopesKS407725498852qtl6me62020111:24000
Kinsman-Searsport association, 0 to 3 percent slopesKS270025499592r0vhme62120111:24000
Searsport mucky peat154352796109cypnh00519851:20000
Searsport mucky peat1512672810529fg6nh00919861:24000
Searsport muck159682791659chbnh60219831:20000
Searsport mucky peat, 0 to 3 percent slopes15A17512803769drdnh60720001:24000
Searsport-Chocorua-Naumburg complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes17A5692190454321xtwnh60920071:24000
Searsport-Borosaprists-Naumburg complex3673442900629qtvny01919951:24000
Searsport-Haplosaprists-Naumburg complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes367A1862319786bqrpny03120071:24000
Searsport peat, 0 to 3 percent slopesSeA99217144271vk03ny03120071:24000
Searsport-Haplosaprists-Naumburg complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes367A2769425168432nb90ny03320181:24000
Searsport peat, 0 to 3 percent slopesSqA46627536702spl2ny03320181:24000
Searsport mucky loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes1024A49117127351vh7jny03520071:24000
Searsport-Wonsqueak-Naumburg complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes368A21217021651v47kny03520071:24000
Searsport-Borosaprists-Naumburg complex367A35252919499ssqny04119941:62500
Searsport-Haplosaprists-Naumburg complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes367A666325182382nb90ny04320181:24000
Searsport-Haplosaprists-Naumburg complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes367A325624527512nb90ny04920181:24000
Searsport peat, 0 to 3 percent slopesSqA71227537302spmvny04920181:24000
Searsport-Haplosaprists-Naumburg complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes367A9731180902nb90ny06519931:24000
Searsport muckSe36862950159wzmny08919901:24000
Searsport-Haplosaprists-Naumburg complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes367A831180362nb90ny08919901:24000
Searsport muckSr6322819459gd0vt01519791:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SEARSPORT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .