Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the SCOTT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of SCOTT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to SCOTT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
7578P01311977NE035001Scott7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.5116768,-98.0131344
7579P04171979NE059007Scott7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.3930678,-97.7759039

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the SCOTT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the SCOTT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SCOTT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SCOTT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with SCOTT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the SCOTT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the SCOTT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with SCOTT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NE-2012-02-08-15 | Butler County - February 1982

    Typical pattern of soils in the Hastings-Butler association and relationship of the soils to topography and parent material (Soil Survey of Butler County, Nebraska; February 1982).

  2. NE-2012-02-10-08 | Chase County - November 1982

    Typical landscape pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Kuma association (Soil Survey of Chase County, Nebraska; November 1982).

  3. NE-2012-02-10-10 | Clay County - March 1981

    Typical pattern of soils in the Hastings-Crete-Butler association showing the relationship of the soils to topography and parent material (Soil Survey of Clay County, Nebraska; March 1981).

  4. NE-2012-02-10-11 | Clay County - March 1981

    Typical pattern of soils in the Crete-Hastings association showing the relationship of the soils to topography and parent material (Soil Survey of Clay County, Nebraska; March 1981).

  5. NE-2012-02-10-12 | Clay County - March 1981

    Typical pattern of soils in the Hastings-Massie association showing the relationship of the soils to topography and parent material (Soil Survey of Clay County, Nebraska; March 1981).

  6. NE-2012-02-10-28 | Dundy County - February 1963

    Typical area in the Keith soil association (Soil Survey of Dundy County, Nebraska; February 1963).

  7. NE-2012-02-10-30 | Fillmore County - July 1986

    Typical pattern of soils, topography, and parent material in the Hastings-Crete association (Soil Survey of Fillmore County, Nebraska; July 1986).

  8. NE-2012-02-10-32 | Fillmore County - July 1986

    Typical pattern of soils, topography, and parent material in the Crete-Butler association (Soil Survey of Fillmore County, Nebraska; July 1986).

  9. NE-2012-02-13-12 | Gosper County - February 1981

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Holdrege-Hall association (Soil Survey of Gosper County, Nebraska; February 1981).

  10. NE-2012-02-13-19 | Hall County - January 1962

    Topography, soils, and parent materials, in the southeastern part of Hall County (Soil Survey of Hall County, Nebraska; January 1962).

  11. NE-2012-02-13-23 | Hamilton County - March 1985

    Typical pattern of soils and relationship to topography and parent material in the Hastings-Crete-Holder association (Soil Survey of Hamilton County, Nebraska; March 1985).

  12. NE-2012-02-13-35 | Kearney County - September 1984

    Typical pattern of soils in the Holdrege association (Soil Survey of Kearney County, Nebraska; September 1984).

Map Units

Map units containing SCOTT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Scott silt loamSc12859495935t6co11519691:15840
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded391069626058442qsjzne00119701:20000
Scott silty clay loam, frequently ponded39122022166662ddmcne01119661:20000
Scott silt loam, drained, frequently ponded3917906170002430rspne01919671:20000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded391058117000771v226ne01919671:20000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded391091326058452qsjzne02319791:20000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded3910488026058462qsjzne03519791:20000
Scott silty clay loam, frequently ponded3912315716996291v1lrne04119801:20000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded3910294026058472qsjzne05919841:20000
Scott silty clay loam, drained, frequently ponded3913117216923901tt27ne05919841:20000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded391067826058482qsjzne06119741:20000
Scott silty clay loam, frequently ponded391295316922241tswwne07319781:20000
Scott silty clay loam, frequently ponded39125816999631v1yjne07719871:20000
Scott silty clay loam, frequently ponded391213817001731v259ne07920031:12000
Scott silty clay loam, drained, frequently ponded3913139816921861tsvnne08119821:20000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded391056026058492qsjzne08119821:20000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded391049926058502qsjzne08319671:20000
Scott variant silty clay loam, frequently ponded391692716992641v16zne08519811:20000
Scott variant silty clay loam, frequently ponded39161122288572dt9mne08719651:20000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded3910202126058512qsjzne09919821:20000
Scott soils, frequently ponded391480316992141v15cne11119711:24000
Scott soils, frequently ponded391446416993771v1bmne11319691:24000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded391019626058522qsjzne12919741:20000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded3910534926058532qsjzne13719671:20000
Scott silty clay loam, frequently ponded39126422194732dhjxne13719671:20000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded391020826058542qsjzne15119851:20000
Scott silt loam, terrace, frequently ponded391178116914471ts2tne15519951:12000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded391050626058552qsjzne15919671:20000
Scott silty clay loam, frequently ponded391237617000091v200ne16319871:20000
Scott soils, frequently ponded391419616924391tt3tne16919651:20000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded391050916999091v1wsne17519831:20000
Scott silt loam, frequently ponded391081326058562qsjzne18519741:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the SCOTT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .