Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the RUSSELL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of RUSSELL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to RUSSELL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
108A61IL1470011961IL147001Russell5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.9907437,-88.6527829
108A83IL0290501983IL029050Russell1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.4166444,-88.1819972
108A84P01811983IL147040Russell6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.1472028,-88.4711694
108A85P031883IL039018Russell6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.1466675,-88.8833313
111ADC76161976IN031016Russell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.34755,-85.643425
111ARU78031978IN139003Russell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.4950528,-85.36795
111AWY80131980IN177013Russell3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.7381083,-85.0538417
111ADC76332018IN121033Russell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.3402639,-85.5781028
111CTI85401985IN157040Russell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.5563139,-86.9044278
111DHE69031969IN063003Russell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.6534833,-86.6529528
111DPM76541976IN133054Russell3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.6820111,-86.8008278
111DFR81091981IN047009Russell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.5143,-84.9401639
111D93P0002S1992IN121002Russell7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.9342003,-87.0950012
111D93P0006S1992IN121006RUSSELL7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.9412842,-87.1294479
n/aGN-0031954-OH057-003Russell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aCT-0291955-OH027-029Russell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aCT-0301955-OH027-030Russell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aCT-0451955-OH027-045Russell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aGN-s011955-OH057-S01Russell3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aPB-0071957-OH135-007Russell4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aPB-0081957-OH135-008Russell4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aWA-s181957-OH165-S18Russell3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aPB-0351959-OH135-035Russell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aWA-0371960-OH165-037Russell3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aHY-0581967-OH071-058Russell4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aBR-0161973-OH017-016Russell3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aHY-0701979-OH071-070Russell4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aTI84091984IN157009Russell2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the RUSSELL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the RUSSELL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the RUSSELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RUSSELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with RUSSELL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the RUSSELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RUSSELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with RUSSELL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. IL-2010-09-01-01 | Edgar County - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Xenia-Sanachwine-Drummer association (Soil Survey of Edgar County, Illinois; 2002).

  2. IL-2010-09-01-04 | Edgar County - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Senachwine-Russell association (Soil Survey of Edgar County, Illinois; 2002).

  3. IL-2010-09-01-84 | Woodford County - 1999

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Miami-Birkbeck-Hennepin association (Soil Survey of Woodford County, Illinois; 1999).

  4. IL-2011-08-03-19 | Coles County - 1993

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Miami-Russell association (Soil Survey of Coles County, Illinois; 1993).

  5. IL-2011-08-04-04 | De Witt County - 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Miami association (Soil Survey of De Witt County, Illinois; 1991).

  6. IL-2011-08-04-05 | De Witt County - 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Birkbeck-Russell-Keomah association (Soil Survey of De Witt County, Illinois; 1991).

  7. IL-2011-08-04-55 | Macon County - 1990

    Typical landscape pattern of soils and parent materials in the Miami-Birkbeck-Russell association (Soil Survey of Macon County, Illinois; 1990).

  8. IN-2012-01-19-08 | Carroll County - November 1958

    Schematic cross section of west-central Carroll County showing soil series, parent material, native vegetation, and drainage. Roman numerals below each profile indicate drainage as follows: II, imperfect; IV, good; V, good to excessive; VI, excessive; VII, poor; and VIII, very poor (Soil Survey of Carroll County, Indiana; 1958).

  9. IN-2012-01-19-17 | Fountain County - 1966

    Major soil series in the county in relation to their topography and underlying material (Soil Survey of Fountain County, Indiana; 1966).

  10. IN-2012-01-20-01 | Putnam County - September 1981

    Typical pattern of soils, topography, and underlying material in the Xenia-Russell map unit (Soil Survey of Putnam County, Indiana; 1981).

  11. IN-2012-01-20-02 | Rush County - January 1986

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Miami-Xenia-Russell map unit (Soil Survey of Rush County, Indiana; 1986).

Map Units

Map units containing RUSSELL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Russell silt loam, 9 to 14 percent slopes, moderately eroded481D2691409991frmjia13919861:15840
Russell silt loam, 14 to 18 percent slopes, moderately eroded481E2258409992frmkia13919861:15840
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded322C219312429712t704il01919991:12000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded322C2441114284012t704il02920051:12000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 2 to 5 percent slopes322B173714284002t702il02920051:12000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded322C2381748162t704il03519921:15840
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded322C267808693272t704il03920051:12000
Russell silty clay loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded322D365415381341nmk7il03920051:12000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded322C214772002112t704il04120041:12000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 2 to 5 percent slopes322B130658435622t702il04519971:12000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded322C230558435632t704il04519971:12000
Senachwine-Russell silt loams, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded736D2186515960791qkvfil10720061:12000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded322B217491991142t703il11320001:12000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded322C217481991152t704il11320001:12000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded322C2455619139532t704il11520071:12000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 2 to 5 percent slopes322B269019109082t702il14720091:12000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded322C2225919109092t704il14720091:12000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded322C262718692052t704il20320081:12000
Russell silt loam, 10 to 18 percent slopes, eroded322D21371869206y5gxil20320081:12000
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRywB26622009072vzcjin00520021:12000
Urban land-Fincastle-Russell complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesUfyB1582083466zsvin00520021:12000
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRuB93241624542w0vzin01719791:15840
Russell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopesRuC9091624555g1hin01719791:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRuB12271623552w0vzin02319781:20000
Russell silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesRuA232912775f0vin02319781:20000
Russell-Fincastle silt loams, 1 to 4 percent slopesRxB16116006751qqmpin02919791:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRuB58701624092w0vzin03119801:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRsB22043716129162vzcjin04119581:15840
Russell soils, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely erodedRtC3976516129241r4ctin04119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRsB1836316129152w0vzin04119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, moderately erodedRsC2505716129181r4cmin04119581:15840
Russell and Miami silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedRuB2324416129291r4czin04119581:15840
Russell soils, 12 to 18 percent slopes, severely erodedRtD3250416129251r4cvin04119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesRsA192216129141r4chin04119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, moderately erodedRsD2169716129201r4cpin04119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes, slightly erodedRsE1160116129211r4cqin04119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedRsE2107516129221r4crin04119581:15840
Russell and Miami soils, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely erodedRvC3104016129331r4d3in04119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, slightly erodedRsD184516129191r4cnin04119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, slightly erodedRsC176516129171r4clin04119581:15840
Russell soils, 2 to 6 percent slopes, severely erodedRtB369316129231r4csin04119581:15840
Russell soils, 18 to 25 percent slopes, severely erodedRtE366916129261r4cwin04119581:15840
Russell and Miami silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, moderately erodedRuC266016129311r4d1in04119581:15840
Russell and Miami silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, slightly erodedRuB155116129281r4cyin04119581:15840
Russell and Miami soils, 2 to 6 percent slopes, severely erodedRvB327616129321r4d2in04119581:15840
Russell and Miami silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesRuA9116129271r4cxin04119581:15840
Russell and Miami silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, slightly erodedRuC14716129301r4d0in04119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRywB2104262424902vzcjin04519991:12000
Russell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedRywC2545824249184b9in04519991:12000
Russell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, erodedRywD2164524249284bbin04519991:12000
Russell-Strawn complex, 18 to 25 percent slopesRzcE35324255184d7in04519991:12000
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRuB265001623032vzcjin04719841:15840
Russell silt loam, bedrock substratum, 2 to 6 percent slopesRvB2881623055fwnin04719841:15840
Russell silt loam, bedrock substratum, 0 to 2 percent slopesRvA2471623045fwmin04719841:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRuB221861615062vzcjin06319711:15840
Russell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedRuC24421615075f1xin06319711:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRuB229761614752vzcjin06719671:20000
Russell silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesRuA29091614745f0vin06719671:20000
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRywB25597091442vzcjin07920101:12000
Russell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopesRxC15751630625gp2in10719841:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRuB7121632522w0vzin10919791:15840
Russell silt loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, moderately erodedRtC2159301597935c8min12119651:20000
Hennepin-Russell complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, moderately erodedHrE2139891597625c7min12119651:20000
Russell silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedRtD265771597945c8nin12119651:20000
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRtB261521597922vzcjin12119651:20000
Russell soils, 5 to 8 percent slopes, severely erodedRuC313481597965c8qin12119651:20000
Russell soils, 8 to 15 percent slopes, severely erodedRuD39881597975c8rin12119651:20000
Russell loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesRsC3791597915c8kin12119651:20000
Russell loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRsB2491597902w0w9in12119651:20000
Russell soils, 2 to 5 percent slopes, severely erodedRuB3761597955c8pin12119651:20000
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRuB111841598552w0vzin13319791:15840
Russell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopesRuC90631598565cbnin13319791:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRuB77521610012w0vzin13919831:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRsB1671216130642w0vzin16119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRsB2631516130652vzcjin16119581:15840
Russell and Miami silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedRuB2547616130751r4jpin16119581:15840
Russell and Miami silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, slightly erodedRuB1547416130741r4jnin16119581:15840
Russell soils, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely erodedRtC3441616130701r4jjin16119581:15840
Russell and Miami soils, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely erodedRvC3303816130791r4jtin16119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesRsA176716130631r4j9in16119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, moderately erodedRsC2118516130811r4jwin16119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes, slightly erodedRsE1112516130671r4jfin16119581:15840
Russell and Miami silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesRuA108116130731r4jmin16119581:15840
Russell soils, 12 to 18 percent slopes, severely erodedRtD390316130711r4jkin16119581:15840
Russell and Miami silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, moderately erodedRuC277216130771r4jrin16119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, slightly erodedRsD177016130821r4jxin16119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, slightly erodedRsC155716130801r4jvin16119581:15840
Russell soils, 2 to 6 percent slopes, severely erodedRtB348816130691r4jhin16119581:15840
Russell and Miami soils, 2 to 6 percent slopes, severely erodedRvB346316130781r4jsin16119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, moderately erodedRsD244016130661r4jdin16119581:15840
Russell silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedRsE232416130681r4jgin16119581:15840
Russell and Miami silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, slightly erodedRuC127716130761r4jqin16119581:15840
Russell soils, 18 to 25 percent slopes, severely erodedRtE321416130721r4jlin16119581:15840
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedRuB254661604632t703in16519771:20000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 5 to 10 percent slopes, erodedRuC238061604642t704in16519771:20000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedRuB221911596972t703in16719711:20000
Russell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, severely erodedRuC38561596995c5lin16719711:20000
Russell silt loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes, erodedRuD26951597005c5min16719711:20000
Russell silt loam, Bloomington Ridged Plain, 5 to 10 percent slopes, erodedRuC26391596982t704in16719711:20000
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRsB214952491312vzcjin17719841:15840
Russell silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedRsC25612491328c7jin17719841:15840
Russell-Miamian silt loams, bedrock substratum, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedRwB2123531697965pp9oh01719771:15840
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedRvB293931697945pp7oh01719771:15840
Miamian-Russell silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedMsC271611697772vzcnoh01719771:15840
Russell-Urban land complex, gently slopingRxB63571697975ppboh01719771:15840
Miamian-Russell silt loams, bedrock substratum, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedMtC260671697792w0vboh01719771:15840
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesRvB40621697935pp6oh01719771:15840
Russell-Miamian silt loams, bedrock substratum, 2 to 6 percent slopesRwB33391697955pp8oh01719771:15840
Russell-Miamian, bedrock substratum-Urban land complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedRwUB22934338114130trkoh01719771:15840
Miamian-Russell-Urban land complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedMsUC22290338111130tqloh01719771:15840
Russell-Miamian-Urban land complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedRvUB22289338113730trfoh01719771:15840
Russell-Miamian, bedrock substratum-Urban land complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesRwUB1833338113930trhoh01719771:15840
Miamian-Russell silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, moderately erodedMsD218141697785pnqoh01719771:15840
Miamian-Russell, bedrock substratum-Urban land complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedMtUC21361338111530tqqoh01719771:15840
Urban land-Russell-Miamian complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedURvB21200338113830trgoh01719771:15840
Urban land-Russell complex, gently slopingURxB10763381173317lkoh01719771:15840
Russell-Miamian-Urban land complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesRvUB942338113530trcoh01719771:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRtB5841697922w0vzoh01719771:15840
Urban land-Russell-Miamian, bedrock substratum, complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedURwB2470338114230trloh01719771:15840
Urban land-Russell-Miamian, bedrock substratum, complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesURwB451338114030trjoh01719771:15840
Urban land-Miamian-Russell complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedUMsC2337338111230tqmoh01719771:15840
Miamian-Russell-Urban land complex, 12 to 18 percent slopes, moderately erodedMsUD2279338111330tqnoh01719771:15840
Urban land-Russell-Miamian complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesURvB267338113630trdoh01719771:15840
Russell-Urban land complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesRtUB223338113330tr9oh01719771:15840
Urban land-Miamian-Russell, bedrock substratum, complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedUMtC2212338111630tqroh01719771:15840
Russell-Urban land complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesRzB11217216231vsh7oh01719771:15840
Urban land-Miamian-Russell complex, 12 to 18 percent slopes, moderately erodedUMsD271338111430tqpoh01719771:15840
Russell silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, erodedRsB26517216221vsh6oh01719771:15840
Urban land-Russell complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesURtB33338113430trboh01719771:15840
Russell-Xenia silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRuB237391720125rzsoh02719991:12000
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesRvB156331693475p6toh05719741:15840
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedRvB236021693485p6voh05719741:15840
Russell silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesRuA1121693465p6soh05719741:15840
Russell-Xenia silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRwB278185748520bvwoh05719741:15840
Urban land-Alfic Udarents-Russell complex, 0 to 12 percent slopesUALXC124526528952pyz5oh06119801:15840
Russell silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, erodedRwB27481694405p9toh06119801:15840
Russell-Urban land complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, erodedRwUB266342205631gh1oh06119801:15840
Russell-Miamian silt loams, bedrock substratum, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedRvB22917208111vrn1oh06119801:15840
Miamian-Russell silt loams, bedrock substratum, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedMsC22817208012w0vboh06119801:15840
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesRuB2217208081vrmyoh06119801:15840
Russell-Miamian silt loams, bedrock substratum, 2 to 6 percent slopesRvB917208101vrn0oh06119801:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRwB117208072w0vzoh06119801:15840
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedRuB2117208091vrmzoh06119801:15840
Miamian-Russell silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesMrB972414204701jp3moh07119731:15840
Miamian-Russell silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedMrB2110414204711jp3noh07119731:15840
Miamian-Russell silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedMrC266414204722vzcnoh07119731:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRuB21014205192w0vzoh07119731:15840
Russell-Xenia silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRxB2114207011jpc2oh07119731:15840
Russell silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesRuB40201703132w0vzoh11319691:15840
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, moderately erodedRvC25161703145q70oh11319691:15840
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, moderately erodedRvD21171703155q71oh11319691:15840
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesRuB2315623378nxnzoh13520051:12000
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRuB22072623379nxp0oh13520051:12000
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedRvB2111151713995rc0oh16519671:20000
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesRvB99631713985rbzoh16519671:20000
Miamian-Russell silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedMrC261441713722vzcnoh16519671:20000
Russell-Miamian-Urban land complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedRvUB24722342230930trfoh16519671:20000
Russell-Miamian-Urban land complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesRvUB4508342230730trcoh16519671:20000
Miamian-Russell-Urban land complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedMrUC22733342228630tqloh16519671:20000
Urban land-Russell-Miamian complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesURvB865342230830trdoh16519671:20000
Urban land-Russell-Miamian complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedURvB2830342231030trgoh16519671:20000
Urban land-Miamian-Russell complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedUMrC2588342228730tqmoh16519671:20000
Russell-Miamian-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesRvUA222342230631mymoh16519671:20000
Russell-Miamian silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesRvA2071713975rbyoh16519671:20000
Russell-Xenia silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedRxB26217009481v2z9oh16519671:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the RUSSELL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .