Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ROWLAND soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ROWLAND, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ROWLAND were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14774PA0670991974PA067099Rowland3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.5575,-77.3852778
14878PA0710321978PA071032Rowland4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.2016667,-76.4666667
14878PA0710331978PA071033Rowland5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.1916667,-76.4808333

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ROWLAND soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ROWLAND series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROWLAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROWLAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ROWLAND share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROWLAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROWLAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ROWLAND, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. PA-2010-09-30-01 | Adams County - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Penn-Klinesville-Croton general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Adams County, Pennsylvania; 2005).

  2. PA-2012-03-12-30 | Bucks and Philadelphia Counties - July 1975

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Penn-Klinesville soil association (Soil Survey of Bucks and Philadelphia Counties County, PA; 1975).

  3. PA-2012-03-13-72 | Montgomery County - April 1967

    Typical landscape in the northern part of Montgomery County, showing the relationship of the soils formed on red shale and siltstone (Soil Survey of Montgomery County, PA; 1967).

  4. PA-2012-03-13-74 | Montgomery County - April 1967

    Typical landscape in the south-central part of Montgomery County, showing the relationship of the soils, and the underlying material, relief, and position on the landscape (Soil Survey of Montgomery County, PA; 1967).

Map Units

Map units containing ROWLAND as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesRoA160824960392ptnqmd01320101:12000
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesRwA2935534862kykmmd02120011:12000
Bowmansville-Rowland silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopesBmA1137534914kym9md02120011:12000
Bowmansville-Rowland complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesBmB381534915kymbmd02120011:12000
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded50A794533644kx9bmd03119891:15840
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedRorAt771213901511hnklnj01919701:24000
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedRorAt19441352094jplnj02119691:24000
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedRorAt162913954251hv1qnj02319851:24000
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedRorAt1444814049861j504nj03519721:24000
Rowland silt loamRw4824545650l9smpa00119911:24000
Rowland silt loamRo381543073l73hpa01119971:24000
Rowland silt loamRo1385543718l7s9pa01719971:24000
Rowland silt loamRo81616122221r3n5pa02920081:24000
Rowland silt loamRd2753542793l6tgpa07119821:15840
Rowland silt loamRo414541329l597pa07519761:20000
Rowland silt loam, terraceRt5046541254l56tpa09120081:12000
Rowland silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesRwB534541257l56xpa09120081:12000
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesRwA509541256l56wpa09120081:12000
Rowland silt loamRo38514795671lnlzpa10119711:15840
Rowland silt loamRw6279542951l6zkpa13319901:24000
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occassionally flooded784605164682xxz2va00319811:15840
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded89A242222505222fjvhva05920071:12000
Chantilly-Rowland complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded26A9922503082fjmlva05920071:12000
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded5A3144189524721m50va06120061:12000
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded5A2706642011pk21va10720061:12000
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedRw7381199172zhghva13719661:15840
Rowland silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes49A2010521212khc9va15319851:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ROWLAND soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .