Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ROUGH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ROUGH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ROUGH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ROUGH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ROUGH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROUGH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROUGH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ROUGH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROUGH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROUGH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ROUGH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing ROUGH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Rock outcrop-Rough complex, 55 to 100 percent slopesRrG185724012412llpdmd00120091:12000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes52E55834834396x080va00520031:24000
Weikert-Rough complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes53F27375834398x082va00520031:24000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes52D11301834395x07zva00520031:24000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes, very stony52F2304834397x081va00520031:24000
Weikert-Rock outcrop-Rough complex54F1062834399x083va00520031:24000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes57E4080214514191kq9zva01720051:24000
Weikert-Rough complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes60F3052514514201kqb0va01720051:24000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes, very stony58F1252614514241kqb4va01720051:24000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes57D1167814514181kq9yva01720051:24000
Weikert-Rock outcrop-Rough complex, 55 to 100 percent slopes59F150714514781kqcwva01720051:24000
Calvin-Rough complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes, very stony10E133914026881j2m0va02120051:24000
Weikert-Rough-Rock outcrop complex, 70 to 100 percent slopes40F34314026901j2m2va02120051:24000
Calvin-Rough complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes, very rocky2F7416708321t2mtva02720061:24000
Calvin-Rough complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes, very stony10G109024810622p8r8va04520101:24000
Weikert-Rough-Rock outcrop complex, 70 to 100 percent slopes41G21024810652p8rcva04520101:24000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes, very stony55G1504725121102q9jwva09120101:24000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes54F1080725121092q9jvva09120101:24000
Weikert-Rough complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes57G454525121122q9jyva09120101:24000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes54E330325121082q9jtva09120101:24000
Weikert-Rock outcrop-Rough complex, 55 to 100 percent slopes56G4825121112q9jxva09120101:24000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes75E541925148862qddtva16320101:24000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes75F537025148872qddvva16320101:24000
Weikert-Rough-Rock outcrop complex, 70 to 100 percent slopes76G52225148882qddwva16320101:24000
Calvin-Rough complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes, very rocky11F314916711551t2z7va16720061:24000
Calvin-Rough complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes, very rocky7F6552778025v3llva16920031:24000
Calvin-Rough complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes, very rocky11G52125074792q7p8va19520101:24000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyWrG492553113lkkcwv02520021:24000
Weikert-Berks-Rough complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyWrG233317160961vlqywv06319621:24000
Rough very channery silt loam, 25 to 35 percent slopesRgE195316061101qx90wv06319621:24000
Rough very channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesRgD158216061071qx8xwv06319621:24000
Rock outcrop-Rough complex, 55 to 100 percent slopesRgG911555734ln8xwv06520031:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ROUGH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .