Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ROSMAN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ROSMAN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ROSMAN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
130B01P004700TN009005Rosman7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.5953791,-83.8207311
130B86P093486NC099001Rosman7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.4233322,-83.3505554
130B88P087488NC199007Rosman7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.8711128,-82.3191681

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ROSMAN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ROSMAN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROSMAN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROSMAN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ROSMAN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROSMAN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROSMAN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ROSMAN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NC-2012-02-07-05 | Clay County - 1998

    Typical relationship of soils, landscape position, and parent material in the Rosman-Reddies-Arkaqua-French general soil map unit on flood plains and in the Braddock-Tate general soil map unit on low rolling hills (Soil Survey of Clay County, North Carolina; 1998).

Map Units

Map units containing ROSMAN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Comus fine sandy loam (rosman)Cy625545910lb20nc00519671:15840
Rosman loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRoA757548095ldbhnc01119971:12000
Rosman sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, frequently floodedRsB234548096ldbjnc01119971:12000
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRsA133916720761t3xync02120061:12000
Rosman loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRsA232424231482mbh2nc03920091:12000
Rosman-Urban land complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRuA10024231492mbh3nc03920091:12000
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedRsA917546444lbm7nc04319911:12000
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely floodedRnA341546443lbm6nc04319911:12000
Rosman loamRo2158546871lc20nc08919741:20000
Rosman-Reddies complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded123925092722p7wsnc08919741:20000
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRoA412547098lc9bnc09919911:12000
Rosman loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRoA3400547220lcf8nc11119891:24000
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedRsA2554545858lb0bnc11319901:12000
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRsA25216714301t383nc11520061:12000
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRoA605547584lct0nc12119971:12000
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently floodedRo617523903922l7dfnc17519681:15840
Rosman-Reddies complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded1235125018492q8mxnc17519681:15840
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRoA1353529730ks72nc18920011:12000
Rosman-Reddies complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRzA359713835111hfndnc19319931:24000
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRoA605547862ld2znc19919971:12000
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRoA316556312lnwknc60520071:12000
Rosman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRoA1988546796lbzlnc60619911:12000
Rosman sandy loam, occasionally floodedRo1648529702ks65tn60820011:24000
Rosman-Reddies complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes, frequently floodedRv753553593ll1vtn64020071:24000
Rosman-Reddies-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes, occasionally floodedRw97557314lpxwtn64020071:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ROSMAN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .