Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ROSEBUD soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ROSEBUD, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ROSEBUD were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
60A40A2453S1957SD113012Rosebud6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.0427475,-102.9935913
6440A24521957SD113003Rosebud6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.0463528,-102.1967389
67A40A3468S1953WY015007Rosebud5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.7455559,-104.4880524
7294P011893NE105001Rosebud8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.0469611,-103.9272389
7240A2299S1957NE105001Rosebud7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.1067139,-103.4113972
7240A2301S1957NE105005Rosebud6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.1202774,-103.6316681
7240A2302S1957NE105006Rosebud5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.12075,-103.3962194
7240A2304S1957NE105010Rosebud5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.0619111,-103.7958472
7240A2215S1974NE029004Rosebud3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.5353611,-101.8090556
7281P0117S1980NE007001Rosebud7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.4041672,-103.7955551
7285P0848S1985NE033055Rosebud8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.1360556,-103.3378722
7290P0783S1990NE029002Rosebud5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.5585139,-101.98575
7290P0786S1990NE029002ARosebud6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.5585333,-101.985675
7290P0787S1990NE029002BRosebud6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.5585389,-101.9854917
7206N0894S2001NE033001Rosebudn/aPrimary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.231,-102.9994167

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ROSEBUD soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ROSEBUD series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROSEBUD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROSEBUD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ROSEBUD share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROSEBUD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROSEBUD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ROSEBUD, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NE-2012-02-08-01 | Banner County - October 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Alliance-Keith-Sidney association (Soil Survey of Banner County, Nebraska; October 1994).

  2. NE-2012-02-10-06 | Chase County - November 1982

    Typical landscape pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Woodly-Jayem-Ascalon association (Soil Survey of Chase County, Nebraska; November 1982).

  3. NE-2012-02-10-07 | Chase County - November 1982

    Typical landscape pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Rosebud-Canyon association (Soil Survey of Chase County, Nebraska; November 1982).

  4. NE-2012-02-13-43 | Keith County - November 1995

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Satanta-Kuma association (Soil Survey of Keith County, Nebraska; November 1995).

  5. NE-2012-02-13-47 | Kimball County - March 1962

    Pattern of soils in valley of Lodgepole Creek: (1) Rosebud loams; (2) Bridgeport loams; (3) Tripp loams; (4) Parshall sandy loams; (5) Havre silt loam; (6) Vebar sandy loams; (7) Altvan loams; (8) Canyon complexes; (9) Gravelly land; and (10) Canyon-Rosebud loams (Soil Survey of Kimball County, Nebraska; March 1962).

  6. NE-2012-02-13-48 | Kimball County - March 1962

    Soil pattern of the Keith-Rosebud soil association; (1) deep Rosebud loams; (2) Canyon-Rosebud loams; (3) Goshen loams; (4) moderately deep Rosebud loams; and (5) Keith loams (Soil Survey of Kimball County, Nebraska; March 1962).

  7. NE-2012-02-13-94 | Sheridan County - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Oglala-Alliance-Canyon association (Soil Survey of Sheridan County, Nebraska; 2002).

  8. SD-2012-03-14-01 | Bennett County - May 1971

    Typical association of Valentine, Mosher, Minatare, Loup, Keith, Rosebud, Oglala, and Canyon soils in the southern part of Bennett County (Soil Survey of Bennett County, SD; 1971).

  9. SD-2012-03-14-02 | Bennett County - May 1971

    Typical pattern of soils in the Keith-Rosebud association (Soil Survey of Bennett County, SD; 1971).

  10. SD-2012-03-15-91 | Shannon County - April 1971

    Representative pattern of soils in association 1 (Soil Survey of Shannon County, SD; 1971).

  11. SD-2012-03-15-92 | Shannon County - April 1971

    Representative pattern of soils in association 2 (Soil Survey of Shannon County, SD; 1971).

  12. WY-2012-03-23-04 | Goshen County, Northern Part - October 1981

    Typical landscape and parent material of Satanta-Noden soils, Rosebud-Hargreave soils, and Satanta-Willowman-Lambman soils (Soil Survey of Goshen County, Wyoming, Northern Part; 1981).

  13. WY-2012-03-23-05 | Goshen County, Southern Part - November 1971

    Typical pattern of soils, topography, and parent material in association 2 (Soil Survey of Goshen County, Wyoming, Southern Part; 1971).

Map Units

Map units containing ROSEBUD as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Rosebud-Escabosa loams, 3 to 5 percent slopes96208119458335f2co07519741:24000
Wages-Rosebud loams, 5 to 9 percent slopes1241116794487359zco07519741:24000
Rosebud-Escabosa loams, 5 to 9 percent slopes97111469458435f3co07519741:24000
Rosebud-Escabosa-Iliff complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes9892099458535f4co07519741:24000
Wages-Rosebud loams, 3 to 5 percent slopes123109694486359yco07519741:24000
Rosebud fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes58701195152360fco61719801:24000
Rosebud fine sandy loam, 6 to 9 percent slopes59347095153360gco61719801:24000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 3 to 6 percent slopes1740872116925042wz9pne00719881:20000
Rosebud loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes1726264816925032wz8qne00719881:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes173919522281442wz8nne00719881:20000
Rosebud-Blanche complex , 1 to 3 percent slopes17356722281432dsklne00719881:20000
Rosebud-Canyon complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes173625296357822d0bnne01319801:20000
Alliance-Rosebud loams, 3 to 6 percent slopes510917799357763d08rne01319801:20000
Alliance-Rosebud loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes5108131523577622tvv2ne01319801:20000
Rosebud loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes1726114183578212wf32ne01319801:20000
Rosebud loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes17257377357820d0blne01319801:20000
Rosebud-Canyon complex, 9 to 30 percent slopes17373920357823d0bpne01319801:20000
Alliance-Rosebud loams, 6 to 11 percent slopes51103385357764d08sne01319801:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes17392796516990562wz8pne02919801:20000
Rosebud loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes17251684016990532wz90ne02919801:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 3 to 6 percent slopes1740984516990572wz9nne02919801:20000
Rosebud loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes1726718516990542wz8qne02919801:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes1738684416990551v107ne02919801:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded1743179916990581v10bne02919801:20000
Rosebud loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes17262284216987052wz8qne03319891:20000
Rosebud-Canyon complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes17361514216987071v0n0ne03319891:20000
Rosebud loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes17271231216987061v0mzne03319891:20000
Rosebud loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes1725464316987042wz8zne03319891:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes173981222196822wz8nne03319891:20000
Rosebud-Hemingford loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes174413422196832dhrpne03319891:20000
Alliance-Rosebud loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes510811522196992dhs6ne03319891:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 3 to 9 percent slopes1742322623581562tvvjne04519731:20000
Rosebud silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes17306100358155d0pdne04519731:20000
Rosebud loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes172612222175492wf32ne04519731:20000
Rosebud-Canyon complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes17362322175712dfkkne04519731:20000
Alliance-Rosebud loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes51081660716987941v0qtne04920001:24000
Alliance-Rosebud loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes5108436222192252dh8xne06919951:20000
Rosebud loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes1726226816989052wz8qne10119901:20000
Rosebud loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes172890716989061v0vfne10119901:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 3 to 6 percent slopes17401022195952wz9nne10119901:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes17395482716925522wz8nne10520041:24000
Brownson-Rosebud-Canyon loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes15243178416925391tt71ne10520041:24000
Rosebud-Hemingford loams, 0 to 1 percent slopes17442328416925531tt7hne10520041:24000
Rosebud loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes17251727616925512wz8zne10520041:24000
Rosebud-Blanche complex , 1 to 3 percent slopes17351098116925541tt7jne10520041:24000
Rosebud-Tassel sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes1745828316925551tt7kne10520041:24000
Rosebud loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes17262122279262wz8qne10520041:24000
Rosebud loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes17263736416989812wz8qne13519871:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes17391347116989822wz8pne13519871:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 3 to 6 percent slopes17401174916989832wz9nne13519871:20000
Rosebud loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes1725748516989802wz90ne13519871:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded1743133616989841v0xyne13519871:20000
Rosebud loam, 6 to 9 percent slopes1729120516537821shwtne15719651:20000
Rosebud loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes172647291006312wf32ne16119921:20000
Keith-Rosebud silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesKrB838753527492tzzcsd00720041:20000
Keith-Rosebud silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesKrA122633527482tzzbsd00720041:20000
Canyon-Rosebud loams, 3 to 12 percent slopesCyD290923527272zj4dsd00720041:20000
Oglala-Rosebud silt loams, 3 to 6 percent slopesOrB2211352758cv29sd00720041:20000
Oglala-Rosebud silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopesOrA1751352757cv28sd00720041:20000
Rosebud and Canyon soils, 9 to 21 percent slopesRcE3974353027cvbzsd12119671:31680
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesRuC5175354443cwtnsd12319751:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 9 to 15 percent slopesRuD2133354444cwtpsd12319751:20000
Rosebud loam, 3 to 6 percent slopesRsB988354442cwtmsd12319751:20000
Keith-Rosebud-Canyon complex, 5 to 9 percent slopesKsC189492995900cv60sd61019651:20000
Keith-Rosebud silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesKrB335529254812tzzcsd61019651:20000
Rosebud-Canyon, moist loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesU635B35324854182pf8ssd61220111:20000
Rosebud-Canyon loams, 5 to 9 percent slopesReB308292582732cv4gsd61320111:24000
Rosebud-Keith silt loams, 3 to 9 percent slopesRkC2045825827332y6dzsd61320111:24000
Keith-Rosebud silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesKrA672325827102tzzbsd61320111:24000
Rosebud-Canyon, moist loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesU635B1925828512pf8ssd61320111:24000
Rosebud and Hargreave fine sandy loams, 0 to 6 percent sl opesRhB79731047373hzmwy61519651:20000
Rosebud and Norka loams, 1 to 6 percent slopesRnB66481047393hzpwy61519651:20000
Rosebud-Dunday-Trelona loamy fine sands, 0 to 3 percent sl opesReA55091047353hzkwy61519651:20000
Rosebud-Dunday-Trelona loamy fine sands, 3 to 10 percent s lopesReC43531047363hzlwy61519651:20000
Rosebud-Trelona fine sandy loams, 0 to 6 percent slopesRuB38821047433hztwy61519651:20000
Rosebud-Trelona complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesRtB35631047423hzswy61519651:20000
Rosebud and Satanta loams, 0 to 3 percent slopesRsA24901047413hzrwy61519651:20000
Rosebud and Hargreave fine sandy loams, 6 to 10 percent sl opesRhC23541047463hzxwy61519651:20000
Rosebud and Norka loams, 6 to 10 percent slopesRnC19561047403hzqwy61519651:20000
Rosebud-Trelona fine sandy loams, 6 to 10 percent slopesRuC17771047443hzvwy61519651:20000
Rosebud and Norka loams, 0 to 1 percent slopesRnA12191047383hznwy61519651:20000
Rosebud-Trelona fine sandy loams, 10 to 20 percent slopesRuD8221047453hzwwy61519651:20000
Rosebud-Hargreave fine sandy loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes23B61021048683j3vwy71519741:20000
Rosebud-Trelona fine sandy loams, 6 to 10 percent slopes24C50161048713j3ywy71519741:20000
Rosebud-Trelona fine sandy loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes24B33631048703j3xwy71519741:20000
Rosebud-Hargreave fine sandy loams, 6 to 10 percent slopes23C30301048693j3wwy71519741:20000
Rosebud-Trelona fine sandy loams, 10 to 20 percent slopes24D3051048723j3zwy71519741:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ROSEBUD soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .