Soil Data Explorer - ROSEBLOOM

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ROSEBLOOM soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ROSEBLOOM, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ROSEBLOOM were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
134	09KY-105-001	2009KY105001	Rosebloom	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	36.7183333,-89.0555556
135A	17N0129	S2016MS105001	Rosebloom	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	33.29925,-88.8161944
135B	40A4723	62OK089003	Rosebloom	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	33.9427795,-94.7600021
135B	40A4724	62OK089004	Rosebloom	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	33.9452782,-94.5333328

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ROSEBLOOM soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ROSEBLOOM series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROSEBLOOM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROSEBLOOM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ROSEBLOOM share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROSEBLOOM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROSEBLOOM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ROSEBLOOM, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. OK-2012-02-17-33 | Pittsburg County - May 1971

   Major soils and underlying material in soil associations 3 and 4 (Soil Survey of Pittsburg County, Oklahoma; May 1971).

2. OK-2012-02-17-45 | Sequoyah County - June 1970

   Typical pattern of soils in associations 1, 2, and 5 (Soil Survey of Sequoyah County, Oklahoma; June 1970).

3. TN-2012-03-16-10 | Gibson County - September 1994

   Pattern of soils in the Rosebloom-Arkabutla general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Gibson County, TN; 1994).

4. TN-2012-03-19-08 | Haywood County - September 1995

   Pattern of soils and parent material in the Rosebloom and Memphis-Loring general soil map units (Soil Survey of Haywood County, TN; 1995).

Map Units

Map units containing ROSEBLOOM as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Rosebloom silt loam, frequently flooded	Ro	2999	570646	m4sy	ky083	1995	1:12000
Rosebloom silt loam, ponded	Rp	1410	570647	m4sz	ky083	1995	1:12000
Rosebloom silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Ro	3613	1598989	1qnw9	ky602	1972	1:12000
Rosebloom silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	Rm	2501	1592692	1qgb5	ky602	1972	1:12000
Rosebloom silt loam, ponded	Rs	1874	1592701	1qgbg	ky602	1972	1:12000
Rosebloom and Bibb soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	RB	8750	2232330	2dxxn	ky610	1968	1:12000
Rosebloom silt loam, ponded	Rp	248	2232331	2dxxp	ky610	1968	1:12000
Arkabutla-Rosebloom complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Ao	56	2232319	2dxx9	ky610	1968	1:12000
Rosebloom silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	Rm	16	2623446	2qykm	ky610	1968	1:12000
Guyton-Rosebloom complex, frequently flooded	Gy	33017	1725284	1vx9b	la073	1969	1:24000
Barclay-Rosebloom complex, occasionally flooded	Br	7849	1725276	1vx92	la073	1969	1:24000
Arkabutla and Rosebloom soils, frequently flooded	AT	53222	326990	bz82	la103	1985	1:24000
Arkabutla, Rosebloom, and Jena soils, frequently flooded	AT	15972	1724134	1vw37	la117	1989	1:24000
Rosebloom-Arkabutla association, frequently flooded	Rk	7762	331749	c46l	ms003	1967	1:20000
Rosebloom silt loam	Rb	1352	331748	c46k	ms003	1967	1:20000
Rosebloom-Arkabutla association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	10	23030	331762	2x59j	ms007	1997	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam, ponded	12	888	331764	c472	ms007	1997	1:24000
Chenneby-Rosebloom complex, frequently flooded	14	825	331766	c474	ms007	1997	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam	Rs	3064	331905	c4cm	ms017	1969	1:20000
Rosebloom fine sandy loam, sandy variant (bibb)	Ro	334	331904	c4cl	ms017	1969	1:20000
Rosebloom silt loam, occasionally flooded	Ro	2351	331945	c4dx	ms019	1982	1:20000
Rosebloom silt loam, frequently flooded	Rs	1067	331946	c4dy	ms019	1982	1:20000
Bibb and Waverly soils (rosebloom, rosebloom)	Bb	9512	332118	c4lh	ms031	1962	1:15840
Arkabutla-Rosebloom association, frequently flooded	AR	7563	332382	c4w0	ms045	1979	1:20000
Chenneby-Rosebloom complex, frequently flooded	Cm	4995	567953	m202	ms051	1997	1:20000
Rosebloom silt loam, depressional	Ro	2834	567987	m215	ms051	1997	1:20000
Rosebloom silt loam	Ro	738	568096	m24p	ms063	1976	1:20000
Rosebloom-Arkabutla association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	RA	7002	332783	2x59j	ms069	1991	1:20000
Rosebloom silt loam, frequently flooded	Ro	6969	332935	c5fv	ms077	1972	1:20000
Rosebloom and Arkabutla soils, frequently flooded	RK	63852	332992	c5hp	ms079	2008	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam, ponded	Rb	1739	1603560	1qtmr	ms079	2008	1:24000
Arkabutla-Rosebloom association	AR	5944	568260	m29z	ms093	1968	1:20000
Rosebloom-Arkabutla association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	RA	37713	333276	2x59j	ms099	1979	1:20000
Arkabutla-Rosebloom association, frequently flooded	AR	33794	333527	c61y	ms109	1980	1:20000
Rosebloom silt loam	Rs	1112	333730	c68h	ms115	1969	1:20000
Rosebloom silt loam, frequently flooded	Ro	362	333827	c6cm	ms117	1995	1:24000
Rosebloom and Arkabutla soils, frequently flooded	Rk	34382	2431374	2mm1f	ms123	2009	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam, ponded	Rb	496	2431375	2mm1g	ms123	2009	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam, frequently flooded	Ro	2791	333980	c6jk	ms127	1993	1:20000
Rosebloom silt loam	Ro	2755	568545	m2m5	ms135	1966	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam, ponded	25	1444	571084	m582	ms157	2006	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam, frequently flooded	Ro	11211	334615	c761	ms159	1997	1:24000
Arkabutla-Rosebloom complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Ao	2374	2545400	2qshz	tn005	2011	1:12000
Rosebloom and Bibb soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	RO	1890	2545379	2qsh9	tn005	2011	1:12000
Rosebloom silt loam, frequently flooded	Ro	3860	566760	m0rl	tn033	1985	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam, ponded	RS	2123	566759	m0rk	tn033	1985	1:24000
Swamp (Rosebloom)	Sw	7589	566817	m0tf	tn045	1963	1:15840
Rosebloom silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, long	Rb	134	3334873	2zym9	tn045	1963	1:15840
Swamp (Rosebloom ponded)	Sw	3100	567030	m119	tn047	1961	1:15840
Rosebloom, Waverly silt loams and frequently flooded soils	RS	16680	567062	m12b	tn053	1990	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam, ponded	Ro	6776	567063	m12c	tn053	1990	1:24000
Rosebloom and Bibb soils, frequently flooded	RB	16217	327492	bzs8	tn069	1996	1:24000
Rosebloom and Bibb soils, occasionally flooded	RO	2354	327493	bzs9	tn069	1996	1:24000
Swamp (Rosebloom)	Sw	445	327649	bzyb	tn071	1961	1:15840
Rosebloom silt loam, frequently flooded	Re	18070	567105	m13q	tn075	1990	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam, rarely flooded	Rb	3500	567104	m13p	tn075	1990	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam, depressional, frequently flooded	Rf	1490	567106	m13r	tn075	1990	1:24000
Rosebloom-Center complex, frequently flooded	Rh	1490	567108	m13t	tn075	1990	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam, frequently flooded, ponded	Rg	1420	567107	m13s	tn075	1990	1:24000
Rosebloom and Bibb soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	RO	9629	2545297	2qs9b	tn079	2012	1:12000
Arkabutla-Rosebloom complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	Ao	9573	2545405	2qsj6	tn079	2012	1:12000
Swamp (Rosebloom, ponded)	Sw	3466	567134	m14n	tn095	1966	1:20000
Rosebloom silt loam, frequently flooded	Ro	2951	567183	m167	tn097	1985	1:24000
Swamp (Rosebloom, ponded)	Sw	6613	567275	m196	tn131	1966	1:15840
Rosebloom silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded, long	Ro	1510	3334874	2zym9	tn131	1966	1:15840
Waverly, Rosebloom silt loams and Frequently flooded soils	WR	30957	567392	m1dz	tn183	1986	1:24000
Rosebloom silt loam, ponded	RO	4603	567385	m1dr	tn183	1986	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ROSEBLOOM soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).