Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ROGERT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ROGERT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ROGERT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
48A91P107191CO055009Rogert7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.0024986,-105.1977768

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ROGERT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ROGERT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROGERT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROGERT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ROGERT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROGERT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROGERT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ROGERT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing ROGERT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Rogert-Woodhall complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes7410725496514jnnlco62719801:24000
Montez-Rogert complex, 15 to 65 percent slopes484383496485jnmnco62719801:24000
Needleton-Rogert families-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes, south aspect10899496567jnq9co62719801:24000
Rogert-Woodhall extremely cobbly sandy loams, 20 to 45 percent3120181498396jqm9co63519791:24000
Troutdale-Rogert complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes4012440498406jqmmco63519791:24000
Woodhall-Rogert extremely cobbly sandy loams, 5 to 20 percent5011400498417jqmzco63519791:24000
Rogert-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 45 percent slopes306440498395jqm8co63519791:24000
Rogert family-Cryolls complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes56661498428jqnbco63519791:24000
Needleton-Rogert families-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes, south aspect515SB10235509849k3jrco63620111:24000
Rogert family-Cryolls, dry complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes702M5354509887k3kzco63620111:24000
Libeg-Rogert families complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes, south aspect501S2586509832k3j6co63620111:24000
Rogert very gravelly sandy loam, warm, 15 to 40 percent slopes9725082498368jqldco63719861:24000
Rogert very gravelly sandy loam, warm, 10 to 40 percent south slopes9611489498367jqlcco63719861:24000
Troutdale-Rogert, warm, complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes1192957498263jqh0co63719861:24000
Rogert very gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes901340224841132pcxpco63820101:24000
Rogert-Legault association, 5 to 40 percent slopes931135424841352pcydco63820101:24000
Rogert very gravelly sandy loam, cool, 10 to 40 percent slopes91856824870802ph0dco63820101:24000
Rogert-Bassel-Edloe very gravelly sandy loams, 10 to 45 percent slopes complex924599507387k0zbco63820101:24000
Rogert-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes94286624841122pcxnco63820101:24000
Rogert, very stony-Herbman-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes141419544974202tz4yco64119801:24000
Troutdale-Rogert-Kittredge complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1563462497436jpmbco64119801:24000
Rogert family, 5 to 40 percent slopes6731B5769762984tlydco6451:24000
Rogert family, 40 to 75 percent slopes6731C2136762985tlyfco6451:24000
Barrett-Rogert families complex, sandstone substratum, 40 to 75 percent slopes3503C1694762968tlxwco6451:24000
Rogert gravelly sandy loam, 10 to 25 percent slopesRtE8417497818jq0nco64619731:24000
Rogert-Bowen association, 20 to 55 percent slopes, extremely stony712C13952509387k31vco6471:24000
Namela-Rogert, very flaggy-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes388115509336k306co6471:24000
Hailman family-Rogert, extremely stony complex, 10 to 45 percent slopes327879509330k300co6471:24000
Rogert, extremely stony-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes737D6771509392k320co6471:24000
Troutdale family-Bobtail family-Rogert complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes124866509278k2ybco6471:24000
Rogert gravelly loam, 35 to 80 percent slopes1142986506958k0jhco6481:24000
Rogert, extremely stony-Foidel complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes971088506944k0j1co6481:24000
Rogert gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 60 percent slopes708207497898jq37co64919771:24000
Rogert, very stony-Herbman-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes5524775127272tz4yco65320001:24000
Pettingell-Rogert-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes36830512708k6hzco65320001:24000
Troutdale-Rogert-Kittredge complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes60379512732k6jrco65320001:24000
Rogert very stony sandy loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes93335498039jq7sco65519841:24000
Bushvalley-Rogert complex, 12 to 50 percent slopes1141438224538072ncd2co66419871:24000
Rogert-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes164714524537002nc8mco66419871:24000
Rogert gravelly loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes40E4862500918jt7nco66619741:31680
Barbarela-Rogert complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes46E3278185952620dzqmt60520071:24000
Barbarela-Rogert complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes46E5076817703wfwjmt61020051:24000
Pando family-Rogert complex7116256552021vfqut63119821:24000
Rogert-Rogert variant complex958829552281vgkut63119821:24000
Buffmeyer family-Rogert family-Sawpit family complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes23613492512449k67mut6461:24000
Elwood-Rogert-Behanin families, complex, 30 to 75 percent slopes148581648mj7vut6491:24000
Behanin-Rogert families-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes110581634mj7dut6491:24000
Libeg family, extremely stony-Rogert family complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes17511763791248vkc4ut6511:24000
Hapjack-Rogert-Amesmont complex, 3 to 25 percent slopes17280707501713jv29wy60119911:24000
Rogert-Rock outcrop-Amesmont complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes220663445017821t1h6wy60119911:24000
Rock outcrop-Rogert complex, 25 to 99 percent slopes21528493501769jv43wy60119911:24000
Rogert-Lakehelen-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 40 percent slopes21915132501779jv4fwy60119911:24000
Redfeather-Lakehelen-Rogert complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes2017142501749jv3gwy60119911:24000
Rogert-Rock outcrop-Amesmont complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes223432016697281t1h6wy60920061:24000
Rogert-Lakehelen-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 40 percent slopes2223116698041t1knwy60920061:24000
Rogert family, very stony-Rock outcrop-Bowen family complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes709CK708665rsf5wy6221:24000
Rogert-Lucky complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes, very stony5375065825314372qmg4wy6301:24000
Rogert, extremely stony-Rock Outcrop complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes6041731124554842nf45wy6301:24000
Rogert, very stony-Rock outcrop-Lucky, very stony complex, 10 to 45 percent slopes5381046925314382qmg5wy6301:24000
Branham-Rogert complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes, stony602696224554822nf43wy6301:24000
Rogert, extremely stony-Beeftrail, very stony complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes603691024554832nf44wy6301:24000
Supervisor family-Rogert complex, 10 to 25 percent slopes535956708332rs2fwy6321:24000
Rogert-Rock outcrop-Supervisor family complex, 25 to 40 percent slopes493515708324rs25wy6321:24000
Rock outcrop-Rogert complex, 40 to 85 percent slopes482939708039rrrzwy6321:24000
Supervisor family-Rogert complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes521059708327rs28wy6321:24000
Rogert-Parkay family-Davtone complex, 10 to 55 percent slopes1761879504036jxh7wy63819901:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ROGERT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .