Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ROCHESTER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ROCHESTER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ROCHESTER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ROCHESTER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ROCHESTER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROCHESTER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROCHESTER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ROCHESTER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ROCHESTER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ROCHESTER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ROCHESTER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing ROCHESTER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Ambrant-Rochester complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes179F1829954614v30mt60319891:24000
Rochester-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes1082546185964920f3pmt60520071:24000
Sebud-Rochester-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes120226185965320f3tmt60520071:24000
Ambrant-Rochester-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes379E1676154746560tmt61620031:24000
Ambrant-Rochester complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes179E115215461955wqmt61620031:24000
Ambrant-Rochester-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes379F633154747560vmt61620031:24000
Ambrant-Rochester complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes179F48615462055wrmt61620031:24000
Ambrant-Rochester complex, 15-35 percent slopes179E6151442424v2zmt62119971:24000
Ambrant-Rochester complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes179D4181442414v2ymt62119971:24000
Ambrant-Rochester complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes179F3201442434v30mt62119971:24000
Rochester, very stony-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes387G51215544556rcmt62219971:24000
Rochester-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes10851217079791vb93mt62319881:24000
Ambrant-Rochester families, complex, low relief mountain slopes and ridges75GAF2026214951550l2mt63520061:24000
Ambrant-Rochester complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes179E71817028891v4zxmt63520061:24000
Ambrant-Rochester-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes379E17317028921v500mt63520061:24000
Ambrant-Rochester complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes179F10617028901v4zymt63520061:24000
Ambrant-Rochester-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes379F8917028931v501mt63520061:24000
Rochester-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes108253551463794x9xmt63619831:24000
Sebud-Rochester-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes12014331463934xbcmt63619831:24000
Ambrant-Rochester families, complex, low relief mountain slopes and ridges273722170345350l2mt63619831:24000
Ambrant-Rochester, warm-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes343091454464wbtmt63819851:24000
Ambrant-Rochester complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes179E21331455734wgxmt64419951:24000
Ambrant-Rochester complex, cool, 15 to 35 percent slopes79E10811458964wtbmt64419951:24000
Ambrant-Rochester complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes179F5801455744wgymt64419951:24000
Ambrant, cool, Rochester, cool-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes279F5741456384wk0mt64419951:24000
Ambrant-Rochester complex, cool, 35 to 60 percent slopes79F5261458974wtcmt64419951:24000
Ambrant-Rochester-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes379E3191456964wlwmt64419951:24000
Ambrant-Rochester-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes379F2471456974wlxmt64419951:24000
Ambrant, cool-Rochester, cool-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes279E1101456374wjzmt64419951:24000
Ambrant-Rochester complex, cool, 4 to 15 percent slopes79D871458954wt9mt64419951:24000
Rochester-Roegulch complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes562F300113896581hn1pmt64520131:12000
Rochester, very stony-Roegulch, rubbly-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes500F2675633701p8dzmt64520131:12000
Rochester-Roegulch complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes562D251513896571hn1nmt64520131:12000
Rochester-Baxton complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes395E146813896491hn1dmt64520131:12000
Rochester-Repkie complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes503D589804834w0hdmt64520131:12000
Rochester-Repkie-Roegulch, stony complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes503F580633704p8f2mt64520131:12000
Rochester-Braziel, very bouldery complex, 40 to 60 percent slopes751431709722z203wy6291:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ROCHESTER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .