Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the RISINGWOLF soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of RISINGWOLF, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to RISINGWOLF were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the RISINGWOLF soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the RISINGWOLF series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the RISINGWOLF series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RISINGWOLF series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with RISINGWOLF share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the RISINGWOLF series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RISINGWOLF series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with RISINGWOLF, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing RISINGWOLF as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Kegsprings family, stony-Mikesell family-Risingwolf, dry complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes253E301430051042x3qvmt60019691:24000
Sherlock family-Risingwolf, stony, dry-Crownmountain family, frequently ponded complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes850E66530051152v5vbmt60019691:24000
Garlet family, extremely stony-Risingwolf, dry-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes335F21030051282v7ztmt61919881:24000
Risingwolf, very stony, moist-Garlet family, extremely stony-Kaina family, complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes320F9430051202v5t0mt61919881:24000
Garlet, extremely stony-Kaina, very stony-Risingwolf, bouldery families, complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes330F1730051212v5t1mt61919881:24000
Risingwolf, very stony, dry-Kegsprings family-Worock family, complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes270D1330051252v5v0mt61919881:24000
Broad Canyon family, stony-Kegsprings family-Risingwolf complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes2004E3384051316lymt6331:24000
Kegsprings family-Risingwolf-Sherlock family, complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes2100D3384030316l2mt6331:24000
Risingwolf-Sherlock family-Boatman family, complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes2240E3384036316l8mt6331:24000
Risingwolf-Sherlock-Kegsprings family, stony complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes2340F3384038316lbmt6331:24000
Kegsprings family, very stony-Worock-Risingwolf complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes2344F3384039316lcmt6331:24000
Risingwolf-Sherlock-Helmville families, complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes2350F3384040316ldmt6331:24000
Risingwolf-Nooney, stony-Lonniebee family, complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes2400F3384042316lgmt6331:24000
Risingwolf, stony-Helmville-Skaggs, stony families, complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes2500F3384043316lhmt6331:24000
Risingwolf-Pippin family, complex, 0 to 35 percent slopes2001E3384050316lxmt6331:24000
Risingwolf family-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes40811911828483062v5w8mt63419881:24000
Risingwolf family, medial silt loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes4071147428483052v5w7mt63419881:24000
Risingwolf, very stony, moist-Garlet family, extremely stony-Kaina family, complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes320F6740128482362v5t0mt66320171:24000
Garlet, extremely stony-Kaina, very stony-Risingwolf, bouldery families, complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes330F6632128482372v5t1mt66320171:24000
Risingwolf family, very bouldery-Rubble land-Cuberant, very stony complex, 60 to 80 percent slopes560F4330428482472v5tcmt66320171:24000
Risingwolf, very stony, dry-Worock family-Broad Canyon family, complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes281E4088628518492v805mt66320171:24000
Mohaggin family, moist-Risingwolf, stony, moist-Pippin family, complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes400D4009728518532v5tzmt66320171:24000
Risingwolf, very stony, dry-Kegsprings family-Sherlock family, complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes261E3678728482732v5v5mt66320171:24000
Garlet family, extremely stony-Risingwolf, dry-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes335F3500028518432v7ztmt66320171:24000
Worock family, stony-Vulture family-Risingwolf, very stony, dry complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes271D3034628482782v5v9mt66320171:24000
Risingwolf, very stony, dry-Kegsprings family-Worock family, complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes270D2511928482772v5v0mt66320171:24000
Risingwolf, very stony, dry-Sherlock family, complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes251E2111728482722v5v4mt66320171:24000
Garlet, extremely stony-Nataga, very stony-Risingwolf families, complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes360E1627328518332v7zlmt66320171:24000
Kegsprings family, stony-Mikesell family-Risingwolf, dry complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes253E1159028482662x3qvmt66320171:24000
Sherlock family-Risingwolf, stony, dry-Crownmountain family, frequently ponded complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes850E1153128482792v5vbmt66320171:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the RISINGWOLF soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .