Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the RIDGETON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of RIDGETON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to RIDGETON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
103UMN2940S1978MN1272940Ridgeton3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.2257004,-95.1892166

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the RIDGETON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the RIDGETON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the RIDGETON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RIDGETON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with RIDGETON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the RIDGETON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RIDGETON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with RIDGETON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. IA-2010-09-09-23 | Webster County - 2008

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lester-Coland-Wadena association (Soil Survey of Webster County, Iowa; 2008).

Map Units

Map units containing RIDGETON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Ridgeton loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes2700C88924813182ncvbia05920111:12000
Gosport-Emeline-Ridgeton complex, 25 to 75 percent slopes413G230116123221r3rdia18720061:12000
Ridgeton loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes2700C41914526681krm8ia18720061:12000
Ridgeton loam, 9 to 14 percent slopes2700D18314285131jyh2ia18720061:12000
Belview-Ridgeton complex, 15 to 45 percent slopesL154E354815298621nbydmn03320081:12000
Belview-Ridgeton complex, 18 to 40 percent slopes, firm till substratumL207F64017130851vhltmn03320081:12000
Ridgeton, sandy substratum-Eden Prairie complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes, moderately erodedN586D2142515919321qfjnmn04920071:12000
Ridgeton, sandy substratum-Eden Prairie complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, moderately erodedN586C2114815919311qfjmmn04920071:12000
Lester-Ridgeton complex, 25 to 45 percent slopesL110F111601071n5gdmn05320011:12000
Lester-Ridgeton complex, 18 to 25 percent slopesL110E17601070n5gcmn05320011:12000
Belview-Ridgeton complex, 18 to 40 percent slopes, firm till substratumL207F102123841922l0yfmn08320081:12000
Belview-Ridgeton complex, 18 to 25 percent slopes, firm till substratumL207E32123844762l17lmn08320081:12000
Belview-Ridgeton complex, 18 to 40 percent slopes, firm till substratumL207F77323866012l3g4mn10120081:12000
Belview-Ridgeton complex, 15 to 45 percent slopesL154E465114526217fqymn10520041:12000
Belview-Ridgeton complex, 18 to 25 percent slopes, firm till substratumL207E29723844752l17kmn12720081:12000
Belview-Ridgeton complex, 18 to 40 percent slopes, firm till substratumL207F18123841602l0xdmn12720081:12000
Lester-Ridgeton complex, 18 to 25 percent slopesL110E934455428h8x7mn16120011:12000
Lester-Ridgeton complex, 25 to 45 percent slopesL110F696455429h8x8mn16120011:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the RIDGETON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .