Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the RICKER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of RICKER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to RICKER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14311N8706S10ME021001Ricker6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.9251389,-68.9101389
14394P0300S1993NY031008Ricker4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0711098,-73.9400024
14394P0302S1993NY031010Ricker5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0936127,-73.9791641

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the RICKER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the RICKER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the RICKER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RICKER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with RICKER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the RICKER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RICKER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with RICKER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. ME-2010-09-03-03 | Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County - 2003

    Typical pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Tunbridge-Lyman-Abram general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County, Maine; 2003).

  2. ME-2010-09-03-04 | Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County - 2003

    Typical pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Sisk-Saddleback-Ricker general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Franklin County Area and Part of Somerset County, Maine; 2003).

  3. NH-2012-02-14-15 | Grafton County Area - 1999

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Saddleback-Ricker unit (Soil Survey of Grafton County Area, New Hampshire; 1999).

  4. VT-2012-03-22-09 | Rutland County - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Glebe-Stratton unit (Soil Survey of Rutland County, VT; 1998).

Map Units

Map units containing RICKER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Ricker-Saddleback association, very steepRSE145272850509km5me61019921:20000
Surplus-Saddleback-Ricker association, strongly sloping, very stonySSC23222850559kmbme61019921:20000
Ricker-Rock outcrop complex, very steepRRE22632850499km4me61019921:20000
Ricker-Saddleback-Rock outcrop complex, very hillyRCE24752858149ldtme61319871:20000
Saddleback-Ricker complex, steepSAE17452858229lf2me61319871:20000
Saddleback-Ricker complex, moderately steepSAD15792858219lf1me61319871:20000
Rock outcrop-Ricker complex, very hillyRNE3252858159ldvme61319871:20000
Ricker-Rock outcrop complex, moderately steepROD43142853609ky5me61519941:24000
Saddleback-Ricker complex, steep, very stonySRE17602853629ky7me61519941:24000
Saddleback-Ricker complex, moderately steep, very stonySRD9472853619ky6me61519941:24000
Naskeag-Abram-Ricker complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stonyNAC142892856079l64me61720041:24000
Abram-Rock outcrop-Ricker complex, 15 to 80 percent slopesACE81562855259l3hme61720041:24000
Saddleback-Ricker complex, 25 to 60 percent slopesSRE345592856459l7cme61920051:24000
Ricker-Saddleback-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 60 percent slopesRSE213592856439l79me61920051:24000
Saddleback-Ricker complex, 10 to 50 percent slopesSRD185182856449l7bme61920051:24000
Ricker-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 80 percent slopesRRF126132856429l78me61920051:24000
Rock outcrop-Ricker complex, 8 to 80 percent slopesRTF70492856479l7fme61920051:24000
Saddleback-Rock outcrop-Ricker complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes, extremely boulderySRE657025499332r0tnme62020111:24000
Ricker-Saddleback complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, rubblyRSE625325499352r0tqme62020111:24000
Rock outcrop- Ricker complex, 0 to 100 percent slopes, rubblyRRF306525499362r0trme62020111:24000
Saddleback-Ricker complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes, rubblySRC93625499342r0tpme62020111:24000
Saddleback-Ricker-Rock outcrop complex, steep735E54142811949flsnh00919861:24000
Saddleback-Glebe-Ricker association, steep, very stony750E188182805929dzcnh60720001:24000
Saddleback-Glebe-Ricker association, moderately steep, very stony750D60512805919dzbnh60720001:24000
Saddleback-Glebe-Ricker association, gently sloping, very stony750B26922805909dz9nh60720001:24000
Ricker-Rock outcrop complex, very steep835F11042806469f13nh60720001:24000
Ricker-Rock outcrop complex, strongly sloping835C1122806459f12nh60720001:24000
Saddleback-Glebe-Ricker complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes, very stony836E602807549f4lnh60720001:24000
Ricker-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes837E562807519f4hnh60720001:24000
Saddleback-Glebe-Ricker complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very stony836C362807539f4knh60720001:24000
Saddleback-Glebe-Ricker complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very stony836D72807529f4jnh60720001:24000
Rock outcrop-Ricker complex, gently slopingRoB83872902239r01ny01919951:24000
Hogback-Ricker complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, very rocky945F28502900909qvrny01919951:24000
Rockoutcrop-Ricker-Hogback complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, very bouldery949F24252900919qvsny01919951:24000
Ricker-Skylight-Rockoutcrop complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes, very bouldery997F20262900939qvvny01919951:24000
Rawsonville-Borosaprists-Ricker complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky943C10702900899qvqny01919951:24000
Ricker-Couchsachraga-Skylight complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes, very rocky, very bouldery995F38380318500bpf6ny03120071:24000
Rock outcrop-Ricker-Skylight complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes, very bouldery998F4908318501bpf7ny03120071:24000
Ricker-Couchsachraga-Skylight complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very rocky, very bouldery995D1638318499bpf5ny03120071:24000
Ricker-Couchsachraga-Skylight complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes, very rocky, very bouldery995F49412517661bpf6ny03320181:24000
Hogback-Ricker complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, very rocky945F473122920019svdny04119941:62500
Ricker-Skylight-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes, very bouldery997F112612920079svlny04119941:62500
Hogback-Ricker complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very rocky945D105132920009svcny04119941:62500
Rawsonville-Borosaprists-Ricker complex, 0 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky943C28342919989sv9ny04119941:62500
Ricker-Skylight-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very bouldery997D23302920069svkny04119941:62500
Hogback-Ricker complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky945C22842919999svbny04119941:62500
Ricker-Skylight-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes, very bouldery997C18832920059svjny04119941:62500
Rock outcrop-Ricker-Hogback complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, very bouldery949F14182920029svfny04119941:62500
Hogback-Ricker complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, very rocky945F8926775799svdny04320181:24000
Ricker-Londonderry-Stratton complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very rocky81D229797880vs82vt00520061:20000
Ricker-Londonderry-Stratton complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, very rocky81E55797881vs83vt00520061:20000
Ricker-Londonderry-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes82F18797882vs84vt00520061:20000
Ricker-Londonderry-Saddleback complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very rockySIE9363924553102ndykvt00920121:
Ricker-Saddleback-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, very stonySIE9440024553122ndymvt00920121:
Ricker-Londonderry complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very rockySIE9215924553112ndylvt00920121:
Ricker peat, very rocky, 15 to 80 percent slopesRkE6372819319gckvt01519791:20000
Ricker-Londonderry-Stratton complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, very rocky210E13902834169hxgvt01920051:20000
Ricker-Londonderry-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes211F252834179hxhvt01920051:20000
Killington-Ricker-Rock outcrop association, very steep, very stony702F30142824279gwkvt02119851:20000
Stratton-Londonderry-Ricker complex, 15 to 80 percent slopes, very rocky134F10772821689gm6vt02119851:20000
Ricker-Londonderry-Stratton complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, very rocky85E47262827679h7jvt02319961:20000
Ricker-Londonderry-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes86F46172827719h7nvt02319961:20000
Stratton-Ricker-Glebe complex, 15 to 70 percent slopes, very rocky213F5652833419hv1vt02720001:20000
Ricker-Londonderry-Stratton complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes, very rocky61F5192832549hr7vt02720001:20000
Hogback-Ricker-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 70 percent slopes, very stony702F3922833559hvhvt02720001:20000
Ricker-Londonderry-Stratton complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very rocky61D3792832539hr6vt02720001:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the RICKER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .