Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the RICELAKE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of RICELAKE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to RICELAKE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the RICELAKE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the RICELAKE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the RICELAKE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RICELAKE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with RICELAKE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the RICELAKE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RICELAKE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with RICELAKE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing RICELAKE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Ricelake, Alstad, and Talmoon soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesC90A03247916307cjmn00319721:15840
Ricelake-Blomford complex, mlra 88, 0 to 3 percent slopesB70A49772653433sfx5mn00719911:24000
Ricelake-Cutaway complex, mlra 88, 1 to 4 percent slopesB60B20942653432sfwxmn00719911:24000
Ricelake, Alstad, and Talmoon soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesC90A31353247929307cjmn02519901:15840
Ricelake, Alstad, and Talmoon soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesC90A27073247943307cjmn05919561:20000
Ricelake, Alstad, and Talmoon soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesC90A23247959307cjmn09520061:12000
Ricelake, Alstad, and Talmoon soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesC90A7693247972307cjmn11520091:24000
Ricelake fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes12541364431441ggygmn14119941:15840
Ricelake, Alstad, and Talmoon soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesC90A123247985307cjmn16319781:15840
Ricelake-Cutaway complex, 1 to 4 percent slopesF202B527624079622ltp6mn61320161:24000
Ricelake-Blomford complex, mlra 88, 0 to 3 percent slopesB70A580802943769sfx5mn62520151:24000
Ricelake-Cutaway complex, 1 to 4 percent slopesF202B1897329438342pfxhmn62520151:24000
Ricelake-Blomford complex, mlra 57, 0 to 3 percent slopesA35A1082229437782dv4kmn62520151:24000
Ricelake-Cutaway complex, mlra 88, 1 to 4 percent slopesB60B108012943767sfwxmn62520151:24000
Ricelake-Cutaway complex, mlra 57, 1 to 4 percent slopesA37B798229437792dv4lmn62520151:24000
Cutaway-Ricelake complex, mlra 57, 2 to 8 percent slopesA39B334629437802dv4mmn62520151:24000
Cutaway-Ricelake complex, mlra 88, 2 to 6 percent slopesB44B30792943768sfx1mn62520151:24000
Ricelake, Alstad, and Talmoon soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesC90A263247999307cjwi01320041:12000
Ricelake, Alstad, and Talmoon soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesC90A723248012307cjwi09519781:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the RICELAKE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .