Soil Data Explorer - RENOHILL

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the RENOHILL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of RENOHILL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to RENOHILL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
43B	40A3128	S1969WY019006	Renohill	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	43.8577766,-107.0897217
58B	81P0443	81WY009009	Renohill	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	43.2322235,-105.0677795
58B	40A3466	S1954WY005001	Renohill	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	44.2744446,-105.4286118
58B	40A3467	S1954WY005002	Renohill	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	44.2402763,-105.5566635

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the RENOHILL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the RENOHILL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the RENOHILL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the RENOHILL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

Competing Series

Soil series competing with RENOHILL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the RENOHILL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the RENOHILL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with RENOHILL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. CO-2011-05-27-19 | Prowers County - 1966

   Cross sections showing relationships of the soils to the landscape and to the underlying geologic formations in Prowers County. The upper cross section shows relationships in the western part of the county, and the lower shows those in the eastern part of the county (Soil Survey of Prowers County, Colorado; 1966).

Map Units

Map units containing RENOHILL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Wiley-Adena-Renohill complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes	WuE	34973	94102	34xk	co001	1968	1:20000
Renohill loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes	ReD	10493	94068	34wg	co001	1968	1:20000
Shingle-Renohill loams, 5 to 25 percent slopes	SrE	7422	94075	34wp	co001	1968	1:20000
Renohill loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	ReB	637	94067	34wf	co001	1968	1:20000
Renohill-Buick loams, 3 to 9 percent slopes	RhD	32223	94147	34z0	co005	1971	1:20000
Renohill-Litle-Thedalund complex, 9 to 30 percent slopes	RtE	15968	94151	34z4	co005	1971	1:20000
Renohill-Buick loams, 9 to 20 percent slopes	RhE	7278	94148	34z1	co005	1971	1:20000
Samsil-Renohill clay loams, 3 to 20 percent slopes	SrE	5465	94155	34z8	co005	1971	1:20000
Renohill loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes	RdD	3640	94145	34yy	co005	1971	1:20000
Renohill-Litle clay loams, 3 to 9 percent slopes	RlD	1635	94150	34z3	co005	1971	1:20000
Renohill loam,reddish variant, 5 to 20 percent slopes	ReE	337	94146	34yz	co005	1971	1:20000
Renohill-Buick complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes, eroded	RkE2	117	94149	34z2	co005	1971	1:20000
Renohill-Shingle complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes	94	10032	94581	35f0	co075	1974	1:24000
Renohill loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	ReC	1994	110462	3py9	co087	1965	1:24000
Renohill-Shingle loams, 5 to 9 percent slopes	RsD	613	110463	3pyb	co087	1965	1:24000
Renohill loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	ReB	590	110461	3py8	co087	1965	1:24000
Renohill loam, moderately shallow, 3 to 5 percent slopes	RbC	9229	94874	35qg	co099	1963	1:15840
Renohill sandy loam, moderately shallow, 3 to 5 percent slopes	RhC	6656	94878	35ql	co099	1963	1:15840
Renohill loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	RaC	5533	94872	35qd	co099	1963	1:15840
Renohill loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	RaB	3594	94871	35qc	co099	1963	1:15840
Renohill loam, moderately shallow, 1 to 3 percent slopes	RbB	2812	94873	35qf	co099	1963	1:15840
Renohill sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	RdC	617	94876	35qj	co099	1963	1:15840
Renohill soils, eroded	Rk2	313	94879	35qm	co099	1963	1:15840
Renohill sandy loam, moderately shallow, 1 to 3 percent slopes	RhB	260	94877	35qk	co099	1963	1:15840
Renohill sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	RdB	120	94875	35qh	co099	1963	1:15840
Renohill clay loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes	62	5348	95026	35wc	co121	1982	1:24000
Renohill-Manzanola clay loams, 2 to 5 percent slopes	63	1756	95027	35wd	co121	1982	1:24000
Renohill-Shingle complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes	57	46269	95151	360d	co617	1980	1:24000
Renohill fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes	55	38998	95149	360b	co617	1980	1:24000
Renohill fine sandy loam, 6 to 9 percent slopes	56	28829	95150	360c	co617	1980	1:24000
Renohill clay loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes	57	4663	95238	3636	co618	1976	1:24000
Renohill clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	56	4040	95237	3635	co618	1976	1:24000
Shingle-Renohill complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes	60	1085	95242	363b	co618	1976	1:24000
Renohill-Buick complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes	RmE	5830	498757	jqzy	co622	1968	1:20000
Renohill-Manzanola clay loams, 3 to 20 percent slopes	RnE	1708	498758	jqzz	co622	1968	1:20000
Renohill sandy loam, reddish variant, 5 to 20 percent slopes	RoE	146	498759	jr00	co622	1968	1:20000
Renohill-Louviers complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes	39	11710	496430	jnkw	co623	1977	1:24000
Truckton-Renohill complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes	42	6185	496434	jnl0	co623	1977	1:24000
Renohill clay loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes	38	3011	496429	jnkv	co623	1977	1:24000
Renohill complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes, eroded	ReE2	22069	95320	365v	co624	1963	1:20000
Renohill clay loam	Rc	21164	95319	365t	co624	1963	1:20000
Renohill-Manzanola clay loams, 9 to 15 percent slopes	133	4164	497411	jplj	co641	1980	1:24000
Manzanola-Renohill-Stoneham complex, 9 to 15 percent slopes	96	3287	497545	jpqv	co641	1980	1:24000
Renohill loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes	132	1336	497410	jplh	co641	1980	1:24000
Renohill-Midway complex, 9 to 15 percent slopes	134	485	497412	jplk	co641	1980	1:24000
Renohill silty clay loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes	RnD	2007	497601	jpsn	co643	1975	1:20000
Renohill loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes	ReD	1475	497599	jpsl	co643	1975	1:20000
Renohill silty clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	RnB	1010	497600	jpsm	co643	1975	1:20000
Renohill clay loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes	90	81	3210274	jpy7	co643	1975	1:20000
Renohill-Midway clay loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes	91	13	3210277	jpy8	co643	1975	1:20000
Renohill clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	89	11	3210275	jpy5	co643	1975	1:20000
Renohill-Midway clay loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes	91	8451	497744	jpy8	co644	1980	1:24000
Renohill clay loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes	90	5789	497743	jpy7	co644	1980	1:24000
Renohill clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	89	1992	497741	jpy5	co644	1980	1:24000
Renohill clay loam	Rn	1414	345501	clj6	mt103	1961	1:20000
Renohill silty clay loam, undulating	Re	5915	346121	cm56	mt607	1970	1:24000
Renohill loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes	145	14556	349226	cqdc	wy011	1978	1:24000
Renohill clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes	147	10054	349228	cqdf	wy011	1978	1:24000
Renohill loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes	144	6468	349225	cqdb	wy011	1978	1:24000
Cushman-Renohill loams, 6 to 10 percent slopes	51	5033	349331	cqhr	wy011	1978	1:24000
Renohill clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	146	4746	349227	cqdd	wy011	1978	1:24000
Renohill-Gaynor clay loams, 3 to 10 percent slopes	148	4059	349229	cqdg	wy011	1978	1:24000
Renohill-Gaynor clay loams, 10 to 30 percent slopes	149	3947	349230	cqdh	wy011	1978	1:24000
Cushman-Renohill loams, 10 to 30 percent slopes	52	3626	349332	cqhs	wy011	1978	1:24000
Gaynor-Limon clay loams, 6 to 10 percent slopes	66	756	349346	cqj7	wy011	1978	1:24000
Renohill-Heldt-Worf association	59	6989	152105	538m	wy043	1976	1:24000
Renohill-Savageton clay loams, 2 to 10 percent slopes	90	16407	349499	cqp5	wy045	1984	1:24000
Renohill loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes	88	4309	349496	cqp2	wy045	1984	1:24000
Renohill clay loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes	89	3610	349497	cqp3	wy045	1984	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill association, undulating	120	1744	349405	cql4	wy045	1984	1:24000
Cushman-Renohill loams, 2 to 12 percent slopes	34	1523	349437	cqm5	wy045	1984	1:24000
Parmleed-Renohill complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes	73	1453	349480	cqnk	wy045	1984	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill clay loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes	228	16140	349928	2v09c	wy605	1995	1:24000
Parmleed-Renohill complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes	190	5154	349886	cr2n	wy605	1995	1:24000
Renohill-Shingle-Worf complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes	201	4458	349899	cr32	wy605	1995	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill clay loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes	229	3707	349929	2v09m	wy605	1995	1:24000
Cushman-Renohill loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes	123	3321	349808	cr04	wy605	1995	1:24000
Renohill-Worfka clay loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes	202	3308	349900	cr33	wy605	1995	1:24000
Renohill-Savageton clay loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes	200	2747	349898	cr31	wy605	1995	1:24000
Renohill-Savageton clay loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes	199	1264	349895	cr2y	wy605	1995	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill clay loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes	260	12800	1669750	2v09m	wy609	2006	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill clay loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes	259	5306	1669751	2v09c	wy609	2006	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes	261	228	1669795	2v09j	wy609	2006	1:24000
Forkwood-Ulm-Renohill complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes	156	177	1669688	1t1fx	wy609	2006	1:24000
Renohill-Worfka-Shingle complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes	217	10	1669789	1t1k5	wy609	2006	1:24000
Renohill-Manzanola complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes	5C10		3358257	30zsp	wy617		1:24000
Bowbac-Worfka-Renohill complex, 1 to 60 percent slopes	5D25		3358247	30zsc	wy617		1:24000
Renohill-Razor-Samsil, dry complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes	RED	45614	350913	2xtvf	wy619	1971	1:24000
Parmleed-Renohill complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes	BU	31256	350818	2xtvs	wy619	1971	1:24000
Cushman-Parmleed-Renohill complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes	CV	14340	350832	2yv75	wy619	1971	1:24000
Briggsdale-Pugsley association	BT	7005	350817	cs1p	wy619	1971	1:24000
Samsil-Renohill association	SE	2893	350924	cs54	wy619	1971	1:24000
Renohill-Danko association	RD	2637	350911	cs4q	wy619	1971	1:24000
Renohill-Razor association, undulating	REC	2405	350912	cs4r	wy619	1971	1:24000
Renohill clay loam, 6 to 14 percent slopes	RcC	513	350918	cs4y	wy619	1971	1:24000
Renohill clay loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes	RcB	337	350917	cs4x	wy619	1971	1:24000
Renohill-Savageton clay loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes	200	109	817246	wfds	wy619	1971	1:24000
Cadoma-Renohill-Samday clay loams, 3 to 12 percent slopes	140	40133	502218	2xtvk	wy625	1985	1:24000
Renohill-Worfka-Shingle complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes	322	11	1421359	2yryg	wy625	1985	1:24000
Danko-Renohill-Montrose-like complex, 10 to 30 percent slopes	5362		3170999	2z20z	wy629		1:24000
Renohill-Threetop-Hiland complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes	5106		3253256	2zyb9	wy629		1:24000
Cushman-Renohill-Gypimack-like complex, 3 to 35 percent slopes	5480		3176968	2z5gq	wy629		1:24000
Renohill-Bunkwater-like complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes	5807		3170984	2z20h	wy629		1:24000
Renohill-Hilight-Pultney complex, 15 to 55 percent slopes	5429		3133246	2ynm5	wy629		1:24000
Hilight-Lonebear-like-Renohill complex, 4 to 20 percent slopes	5328		3133237	2ynlw	wy629		1:24000
Renohill, moist-Ulm association, 3 to 10 percent slopes	237	4267	360543	d35f	wy633	1987	1:24000
Renohill-Savageton complex, 3 to 10 percent slopes, moist	234	3587	360511	d34d	wy633	1987	1:24000
Renohill-Ulm, dry, association, 6 to 15 percent slopes	236	3127	360547	d35k	wy633	1987	1:24000
Renohill, moist-Wyarno association, 6 to 9 percent slopes	240	2973	360991	d3mw	wy633	1987	1:24000
Renohill-Worfka association, moist, 3 to 20 percent slopes	239	2726	360552	d35q	wy633	1987	1:24000
Parmleed-Renohill complex, moist, 9 to 25 percent slopes	206	1264	361087	d3qz	wy633	1987	1:24000
Renohill-Savageton clay loams, moist, 10 to 15 percent slopes	235	912	360508	d349	wy633	1987	1:24000
Parmleed-Renohill complex, moist, 3 to 9 percent slopes	205	894	361088	d3r0	wy633	1987	1:24000
Parmleed-Renohill complex, 3 to 25 percent slopes	204	824	361089	d3r1	wy633	1987	1:24000
Renohill-Savageton clay loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes	233	516	360512	2ztzc	wy633	1987	1:24000
Renohill-Worfka association, 6 to 15 percent slopes	238	435	359323	d1x2	wy633	1987	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill clay loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes	330	65	361232	2v09m	wy633	1987	1:24000
Cushman-Renohill loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes	631	23	2389979	1hyxj	wy633	1987	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill clay loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes	229	3741	817601	2v09m	wy705	2003	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill clay loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes	228	1591	817600	2v09c	wy705	2003	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes	143	57813	351521	2v09j	wy709	1983	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill clay loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes	144	28079	351522	2v09m	wy709	1983	1:24000
Renohill-Worfka-Shingle complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes	128	15686	351506	2yryg	wy709	1983	1:24000
Forkwood-Ulm-Renohill complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes	117	8780	351495	csrk	wy709	1983	1:24000
Renohill-Worfka-Shingle complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes	127	3650	351505	csrw	wy709	1983	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill clay loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes	252	450	1427909	2v09c	wy709	1983	1:24000
Parmleed-Renohill complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes	243	235	1427900	1jxv9	wy709	1983	1:24000
Renohill-Worfka clay loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes	217	42	361288	d3yg	wy709	1983	1:24000
Renohill-Shingle-Worf complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes	218	9	361289	d3yh	wy709	1983	1:24000
Renohill-Savageton clay loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes	667	11953	1672795	2ztzc	wy719	2013	1:24000
Ulm-Renohill clay loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes	715	3228	1406313	2v09m	wy719	2013	1:24000
Cushman-Renohill loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes	631	1057	1399139	1hyxj	wy719	2013	1:24000
Renohill-Shingle-Worf complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes	681	402	1399141	1hyxl	wy719	2013	1:24000
Renohill-Savageton complex, moist, 3 to 10 percent slopes	786	33	1868595	20qf8	wy719	2013	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the RENOHILL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).