Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the REMMIT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of REMMIT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to REMMIT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the REMMIT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the REMMIT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the REMMIT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the REMMIT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with REMMIT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the REMMIT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the REMMIT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with REMMIT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing REMMIT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Remmit-Tullock, shallow, fine sandy loam, 8 to 25 percent slopesRo8139124287152mj8nmt64319671:20000
Vona-Remmit fine sandy loam, 4 to 8 percent slopesVr1924534791831l4qmt64319671:20000
Remmit fine sandy loam, 4 to 8 percent slopesRn366734790431l4mmt64319671:20000
Remmit fine sandy loam, 2 to 4 percent slopesRm64034790331l4lmt64319671:20000
Gilston-like-Remmit complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes2C0333566853014rwy04319761:24000
Gilston-like-Remmit complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes2A0733583063014qwy04319761:24000
Hiland-Remmit complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes222933566612wxn0wy04319761:24000
Bunkwater-Remmit-Docpar, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes1A0133566783014bwy04319761:24000
Shingle-Badland-Remmit complex, 4 to 50 percent slopes5458746233028852wxn1wy6171:24000
Hiland-Remmit complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes2229732732532882wxn0wy6171:24000
Bunkwater-Remmit-Docpar, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes1A01428933028573014bwy6171:24000
Gilston-like-Remmit complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes2A0789333028703014qwy6171:24000
Gilston-like-Remmit complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes2C0347833028713014rwy6171:24000
Remmit-Taluce-Vonalee complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes544815231708642w7k1wy6171:24000
Terro-Remmit-Shingle, very bouldery complex, 4 to 35 percent slopes546412431970442y62zwy6171:24000
Remmit-Vonalee-Jerome-like complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes, frequently flooded13053331708412y4y7wy6171:24000
Bunkwater-like-Remmit-Forkwood complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes5391198132532572zyb8wy6291:24000
Vonalee-Remmit complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes5449157529119272w7k2wy6291:24000
Clapper-Romberg-like-Remmit complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes2426148532030782zbs9wy6291:24000
Hiland-Remmit complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes2229121529691062wxn0wy6291:24000
Remmit-Kamms complex, 4 to 12 percent slopes2346104132066902zc6jwy6291:24000
Hiland-Claprych-Remmit complex, 1 to 20 percent slopes242197231709522z1zgwy6291:24000
Cascajo-like-Remmit complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes234790832066912zc6kwy6291:24000
Terro-Remmit-Shingle, very bouldery complex, 4 to 35 percent slopes546485429691182y62zwy6291:24000
Kamms-Rock Reservoir, frequently flooded-Remmit complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes113347531710092zt97wy6291:24000
Shingle-Ulm-like-Remmit complex, 4 to 30 percent slopes580346732030672zbrywy6291:24000
Shingle-Badland-Remmit complex, 4 to 50 percent slopes545821629691072wxn1wy6291:24000
Remmit-Vonalee-Jerome-like complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes, frequently flooded130517629119532y4y7wy6291:24000
Remmit-Taluce-Vonalee complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes544817329119262w7k1wy6291:24000
Maysdorf-Remmit-Taluce complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes536516731709822z20fwy6291:24000
Taluce-Remmit-Chugcity-like complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes556416532532302zthmwy6291:24000
Remmit-Turnercrest complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes53499631709342z1z0wy6291:24000
Remmit-Bunkwater complex, 4 to 12 percent slopes23573932505022zv7qwy6291:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the REMMIT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .