Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the REDFISH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of REDFISH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to REDFISH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the REDFISH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the REDFISH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the REDFISH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the REDFISH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with REDFISH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the REDFISH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the REDFISH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with REDFISH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing REDFISH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Redfish-Foxcreek complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes13101362315977241qmkhid65020111:24000
Redfish mucky peat, 0 to 2 percent slopes13116172116728181t4pwid65020111:24000
Redfish-Fezip-Lilylake complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes1794459830662sfkid75219991:24000
Fezip-Redfish-Copperbasin complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes714170832322slxid75219991:24000
Copperbasin, cool-Redfish complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes363156831702sjxid75219991:24000
Fezip-Lemroi-Redfish complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes703056832312slwid75219991:24000
Copperbasin-Redfish complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes35835831692sjwid75219991:24000
Redfish-Slagamelt-Shewag complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes43Bbh183185974220f6pmt60520071:24000
Redfish, occasionally flooded-Shewag-Slagamelt complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes43C9024038212lpcmmt60520071:24000
Redfish-Slagamelt-Shewag complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes43B3647811590w7jbmt61020051:24000
Redfish, occasionally flooded-Shewag-Slagamelt complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes43C291123761602krlbmt61220111:24000
Thaincreek-Copperbasin family, rarely flooded-Redfish family, occasionally flooded, complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes, very stony1105C4730448352v1mqmt61519921:24000
Mooseflat-Foxgulch-Redfish families, complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes, occasionally flooded1110D329796342qbyymt62420211:24000
Mooseflat-Foxgulch-Redfish families, complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes, occasionally flooded1110D576425128722qbyymt6321:24000
Como, rubbly-Redfish, very rubbly, occasionally flooded families, complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes2210D59124979222pwt2mt6321:24000
Thaincreek-Copperbasin family, rarely flooded-Redfish family, occasionally flooded, complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes, very stony1105C30628336302v1mqmt6321:24000
Spasski, frequently ponded-Foolhen, occasionally flooded-Redfish, occasionally flooded, families, complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes2140B3384034316l6mt6331:24000
Mooseflat-Foxgulch-Redfish families, complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes, occasionally flooded1110D9929796732qbyymt63720141:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the REDFISH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .