Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the REDCLIFF soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of REDCLIFF, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to REDCLIFF were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the REDCLIFF soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the REDCLIFF series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the REDCLIFF series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the REDCLIFF series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with REDCLIFF share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the REDCLIFF series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the REDCLIFF series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with REDCLIFF, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing REDCLIFF as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Redcliff gravelly loam, 50 to 75 percent north slopes130F40286209922m6or60419881:24000
Redcliff gravelly loam, 30 to 50 percent north slopes130E30386209822m5or60419881:24000
Redcliff-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 65 percent south slopes103Em329934349642mnfor6181:24000
Searscanyon-Redcliff-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 70 percent south slopes382309134349682r5c2or6181:24000
Lickskillet-Redcliff complex, 30 to 60 percent south slopes80Em204634375902mn8or6181:24000
Redcliff-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes102Dm171634375262mndor6181:24000
Redcliff-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 65 percent south slopes103E117836338123ykor62019921:24000
Lickskillet-Redcliff very gravelly loams, 15 to 30 percent south slopes80D70246386624g6or62019921:24000
Lickskillet-Redcliff very gravelly loams, 0 to 15 percent slopes79C49286386224g2or62019921:24000
Redcliff-Lickskillet complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes100C47276337623ydor62019921:24000
Redcliff-Lickskillet-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 50 percent south slopes101E38926337823ygor62019921:24000
Redcliff-Lickskillet-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 30 percent south slopes101D35396337723yfor62019921:24000
Lickskillet-Redcliff very gravelly loams, 30 to 60 percent south slopes80E34396386724g7or62019921:24000
Redcliff-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes102D21296338023yjor62019921:24000
Ruckles-Lickskillet-Redcliff complex, 15 to 30 percent south slopes141D1127342501326j2or6271:24000
Dustin-Redcliff complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes134C323425102t73kor6271:24000
Puderbaughridge-Redcliff-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes8503DO55424375121sgj1or63120181:24000
Puderbaughridge-Rubble land-Redcliff complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes8504DR23124375131nxz8or63120181:24000
Blackgulch-Redcliff-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes7354DO8824374691sgbbor63120181:24000
Redcliff-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 65 percent south slopes5505016900501tqmror63520061:24000
Lickskillet-Redcliff very gravelly loams, 0 to 15 percent slopes85306287323f5or66619701:31680
Ruckles-Lickskillet-Redcliff complex, 15 to 30 percent south slopes141D9635342170226j2or6771:24000
Dustin-Redcliff complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes134C11653391688t73kor6771:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the REDCLIFF soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .