Aggregate lab data for the RANDALL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of RANDALL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to RANDALL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE
.Pedons used in the lab summary:
MLRA | Lab ID | Pedon ID | Taxonname | CI | NSSL / NASIS Reports | Link To SoilWeb GMap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
77C | 01N1050 | 01TX189001 | Randall | 8 | Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties | 33.8443604,-101.6963577 |
77C | 01N1051 | 01TX189002 | Randall | 8 | Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties | 33.8444443,-101.6955566 |
77C | 01N1052 | 01TX189003 | Randall | 8 | Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties | 33.8445015,-101.6952209 |
77C | 90P0597 | 90NM009006 | Randall | 7 | Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties | 34.6413879,-103.496109 |
77C | 97P0516 | 97TX153003 | Randall | 7 | Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties | 33.9622498,-101.4160309 |
77C | 00P0692 | S2000TX445001 | Randall | 7 | Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties | 33.3544731,-102.4506912 |
Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the RANDALL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.
Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the RANDALL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot
, parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .Select annual climate data summaries for the RANDALL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data
.Geomorphic description summaries for the RANDALL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .
Soil series competing with RANDALL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records
and snapshot of the SC database .Select annual climate data summaries for the RANDALL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data
.Geomorphic description summaries for the RANDALL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .
Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.
Typical cross section of the Scott-Finney depression (Soil Survey of Finney County, Kansas; 1965).
Typical cross section of the Manter-Keith association (Soil Survey of Finney County, Kansas; 1965).
Soils of the Spearville-Richfield soil association (Soil Survey of Gray County, Kansas; 1968).
Typical topographic relation of three soil associations in Haskell County. Tivoli-Vona association, the farthest north, blocks drainageways flowing from the Satanta-Manter and the Richfield-Ulysses associations to the south (Soil Survey of Haskell County, Kansas; 1968).
Soils of the Richfield-Ulysses association in the central part of the county (Soil Survey of Haskell County, Kansas; 1968).
Landscape showing soils of the Richfield-Spearville-Ulysses association in the southeastern part of the county (Soil Survey of Haskell County, Kansas; 1968).
Typical topographic relation of three soil associations: Otero-Colby-Likes association in the southwestern corner; Richfield-Ulysses association to the north; and Satanta-Manter association to the east (Soil Survey of Haskell County, Kansas; 1968).
Typical cross section of the major soils of the Richfield-Ulysses association (Soil Survey of Scott County, Kansas; 1965).
Cross section of the Scott-Finney depression and part of sandy area to the east near the Scott-Finney county line (Soil Survey of Scott County, Kansas; 1965).
Typical landscape in the central and eastern part of Cimarron County: Associations 1, 2, 3, and 5 (Soil Survey of Cimarron County, Oklahoma; June 1960).
A schematic drawing showing a normal pattern of soils formed on limy outwash. The typical slope range is given for each soil (Soil Survey of Harper County, Oklahoma; June 1960).
Typical pattern of the soils in association 1, Texas County, Okla (Soil Survey of Texas County, Oklahoma; July 1961).
Estacado-Pep (Soil Survey of Carson County, Texas).
Pantex (Soil Survey of Carson County, Texas).
A representative pattern of soils in one of the playas associated with the Pullman soil (Soil Survey of Carson County, Texas).
Pullman (Soil Survey of Carson County, Texas).
Typical pattern of soils in the Pullman general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, Texas; 2007).
Typical pattern of soils in the Pep-Estacado general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, Texas; 2007).
Typical pattern of soils in the Olton general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, Texas; 2007).
Typical pattern of soils in the Estacado-Pullman general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, Texas; 2007).
Amarillo fine sandy loam association (Soil Survey of Bailey County, TX; 1963).
Stegall association (Soil Survey of Bailey County, TX; 1963).
Soils and underlying formations associated with a saline lake in Bailey County (Soil Survey of Bailey County, TX; 1963).
A representative pattern of soils in one of the playas of the Pullman-Randall soil association (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).
Soil toposequence of playas (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).
Soils in a playa on high plains and associated soils (Soil Survey of Dawson County, TX; 1960).
Patterns of soils around a playa on the High Plains (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, TX; 1968).
Some soils of general soil area 1 (Soil Survey of Lamb County, TX; 1962).
Some soils of general soil area 2 (Soil Survey of Lamb County, TX; 1962).
Soils and underlying formations surrounding a saline lake (now Bull and Illusion Lakes) (Soil Survey of Lamb County, TX; 1962).
Pattern of soils and underlying material in association 5 (Soil Survey of Lipscomb County, TX; 1975).
Soils in a playa (Soil Survey of Terry County, TX; 1962).
Map units containing RANDALL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.
Approximate geographic distribution of the RANDALL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .