Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the RANDALL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of RANDALL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to RANDALL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
77C01N105001TX189001Randall8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.8443604,-101.6963577
77C01N105101TX189002Randall8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.8444443,-101.6955566
77C01N105201TX189003Randall8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.8445015,-101.6952209
77C90P059790NM009006Randall7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties34.6413879,-103.496109
77C97P051697TX153003Randall7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.9622498,-101.4160309
77C00P0692S2000TX445001Randall7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.3544731,-102.4506912

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the RANDALL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the RANDALL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the RANDALL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RANDALL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with RANDALL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the RANDALL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RANDALL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with RANDALL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KS-2012-01-23-03 | Finney County - November 1965

    Typical cross section of the Scott-Finney depression (Soil Survey of Finney County, Kansas; 1965).

  2. KS-2012-01-23-04 | Finney County - November 1965

    Typical cross section of the Manter-Keith association (Soil Survey of Finney County, Kansas; 1965).

  3. KS-2012-01-23-17 | Gray County - January 1968

    Soils of the Spearville-Richfield soil association (Soil Survey of Gray County, Kansas; 1968).

  4. KS-2012-01-23-30 | Haskell County - October 1968

    Typical topographic relation of three soil associations in Haskell County. Tivoli-Vona association, the farthest north, blocks drainageways flowing from the Satanta-Manter and the Richfield-Ulysses associations to the south (Soil Survey of Haskell County, Kansas; 1968).

  5. KS-2012-01-23-31 | Haskell County - October 1968

    Soils of the Richfield-Ulysses association in the central part of the county (Soil Survey of Haskell County, Kansas; 1968).

  6. KS-2012-01-23-32 | Haskell County - October 1968

    Landscape showing soils of the Richfield-Spearville-Ulysses association in the southeastern part of the county (Soil Survey of Haskell County, Kansas; 1968).

  7. KS-2012-01-23-33 | Haskell County - October 1968

    Typical topographic relation of three soil associations: Otero-Colby-Likes association in the southwestern corner; Richfield-Ulysses association to the north; and Satanta-Manter association to the east (Soil Survey of Haskell County, Kansas; 1968).

  8. KS-2012-01-25-32 | Scott County - December 1965

    Typical cross section of the major soils of the Richfield-Ulysses association (Soil Survey of Scott County, Kansas; 1965).

  9. KS-2012-01-25-35 | Scott County - December 1965

    Cross section of the Scott-Finney depression and part of sandy area to the east near the Scott-Finney county line (Soil Survey of Scott County, Kansas; 1965).

  10. OK-2012-02-16-09 | Cimarron County - June 1960

    Typical landscape in the central and eastern part of Cimarron County: Associations 1, 2, 3, and 5 (Soil Survey of Cimarron County, Oklahoma; June 1960).

  11. OK-2012-02-16-47 | Harper County - June 1960

    A schematic drawing showing a normal pattern of soils formed on limy outwash. The typical slope range is given for each soil (Soil Survey of Harper County, Oklahoma; June 1960).

  12. OK-2012-02-17-52 | Texas County - July 1961

    Typical pattern of the soils in association 1, Texas County, Okla (Soil Survey of Texas County, Oklahoma; July 1961).

  13. TX-2010-11-02-23 | Carson County -

    Estacado-Pep (Soil Survey of Carson County, Texas).

  14. TX-2010-11-02-25 | Carson County -

    Pantex (Soil Survey of Carson County, Texas).

  15. TX-2010-11-02-26 | Carson County -

    A representative pattern of soils in one of the playas associated with the Pullman soil (Soil Survey of Carson County, Texas).

  16. TX-2010-11-02-27 | Carson County -

    Pullman (Soil Survey of Carson County, Texas).

  17. TX-2010-11-02-37 | Deaf Smith County - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils in the Pullman general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, Texas; 2007).

  18. TX-2010-11-02-38 | Deaf Smith County - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils in the Pep-Estacado general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, Texas; 2007).

  19. TX-2010-11-02-39 | Deaf Smith County - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils in the Olton general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, Texas; 2007).

  20. TX-2010-11-02-44 | Deaf Smith County - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils in the Estacado-Pullman general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, Texas; 2007).

  21. TX-2012-03-20-01 | Bailey County - April 1963

    Amarillo fine sandy loam association (Soil Survey of Bailey County, TX; 1963).

  22. TX-2012-03-20-04 | Bailey County - April 1963

    Stegall association (Soil Survey of Bailey County, TX; 1963).

  23. TX-2012-03-20-05 | Bailey County - April 1963

    Soils and underlying formations associated with a saline lake in Bailey County (Soil Survey of Bailey County, TX; 1963).

  24. TX-2012-03-20-11 | Carson County - July 1962

    A representative pattern of soils in one of the playas of the Pullman-Randall soil association (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  25. TX-2012-03-20-14 | Carson County - July 1962

    Soil toposequence of playas (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  26. TX-2012-03-20-36 | Dawson County - August 1960

    Soils in a playa on high plains and associated soils (Soil Survey of Dawson County, TX; 1960).

  27. TX-2012-03-20-40 | Deaf Smith County - August 1968

    Patterns of soils around a playa on the High Plains (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, TX; 1968).

  28. TX-2012-03-21-19 | Lamb County - March 1962

    Some soils of general soil area 1 (Soil Survey of Lamb County, TX; 1962).

  29. TX-2012-03-21-20 | Lamb County - March 1962

    Some soils of general soil area 2 (Soil Survey of Lamb County, TX; 1962).

  30. TX-2012-03-21-23 | Lamb County - March 1962

    Soils and underlying formations surrounding a saline lake (now Bull and Illusion Lakes) (Soil Survey of Lamb County, TX; 1962).

  31. TX-2012-03-21-38 | Lipscomb County - December 1975

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in association 5 (Soil Survey of Lipscomb County, TX; 1975).

  32. TX-2012-03-21-90 | Terry County - February 1962

    Soils in a playa (Soil Survey of Terry County, TX; 1962).

Map Units

Map units containing RANDALL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedRaA2547377652f5s2nm66920051:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRaA1524124282742r5hmtx01119631:20000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRa43713626032r5hmtx01719601:20000
Randall fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, overwash, occasionally pondedRf8303626042tmpctx01719601:20000
Randall clayRa434362729d5fytx02319711:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedRaA6068363296f5s2tx04519721:20000
Randall clay, moist, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedRdA1393258065308qctx04519721:20000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedRaA11692377981f5s2tx06520001:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRaA1885424282842r5hmtx06919691:20000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRa186953647372r5hmtx10719641:20000
Randall fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, overwash, occasionally pondedRf2363647382tmpctx10719641:20000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedRaA6395378068f5s2tx11719991:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRa40153651442r5hmtx12519651:20000
Randall fine sandy loam, overwash, occasionally pondedRf161365145d7ywtx12519651:20000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRa20763652012r5hmtx12919751:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedRaA22317695974f5s2tx15320041:24000
Lofton and Randall soils, occasionally pondedLr295366043d8wvtx16519641:20000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRa40153783532r5hmtx16919651:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRa127193919482r5hmtx17919651:20000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRa257523669172r5hmtx18919691:20000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRa983675792r5hmtx21119671:20000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRc36843919022r5hmtx22719651:24000
Randall soilsRd441368250dc61tx25319661:20000
Randall clayRa314368501dcg4tx26319681:31680
Randall clay27605368728dcpgtx27519751:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRa125373942982r5hmtx27919601:20000
Randall fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, overwash, occasionally pondedRf7903942992tmpctx27919601:20000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRaA154213698642r5hmtx30319751:20000
Lipan-Randall complex, frequently pondedLr4132370338dfcdtx31719681:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRo24063703512r5hmtx31719681:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRa2473708932r5hmtx34519721:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedRaA14403124166f5s2tx35919781:24000
Randall clay, breaks, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRbA67431241892yk84tx35919781:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedRaA31402599125f5s2tx36919731:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedRaA17503124265f5s2tx37519741:24000
Randall clay, breaks, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRbA7531242802yk84tx37519741:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently pondedRaA5139371411f5s2tx38119991:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRa14033715352r5hmtx39319791:24000
Randall clayRa125372301dhdqtx43319701:24000
Randall clay, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally pondedRaA2137224283282r5hmtx43719701:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the RANDALL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .