Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the QUONSET soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of QUONSET, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to QUONSET were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the QUONSET soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the QUONSET series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the QUONSET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the QUONSET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with QUONSET share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the QUONSET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the QUONSET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with QUONSET, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MA-2010-09-10-01 | Middlesex County - 2009

    A typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Bernardston-Pittstown general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Middlesex County, Massachusetts; 2009).

  2. MA-2012-02-02-25 | Plymouth County - 1969

    Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in association 2 (Soil Survey of Plymouth County, Massachusetts; 1969).

  3. NH-2012-02-14-08 | Grafton County Area - 1999

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Windsor-Hitchcock-Quonset unit (Soil Survey of Grafton County Area, New Hampshire; 1999).

  4. VT-2012-03-22-11 | Windham County - February 1987

    Typical landscape pattern of several soils and underlying material in Windham County (Soil Survey of Windham County, VT; 1987).

Map Units

Map units containing QUONSET as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Quonset fine sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes262F2792790239cbrma01120121:12000
Quonset sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes262B4264276810991cma01719911:24000
Quonset sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes262D2040796392vqq2ma01719911:24000
Quonset sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes262C1673276811991dma01719911:24000
Quonset sandy loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes262E774276813991gma01719911:24000
Quonset sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes262B1186319844bqtkma02320101:12000
Quonset sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes262C697319845bqtlma02320101:12000
Quonset sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes262E309319846bqtmma02320101:12000
Quonset sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes262A179309420bcz9ma02320101:12000
Quonset loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes262B2285807837w3m8ma61319821:20000
Quonset loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes262C1172807856w3mwma61319821:20000
Quonset loamy sand, 15 to 25 percent slopes262D863807859w3mzma61319821:20000
Quonset loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes262A565807834w3m5ma61319821:20000
Quonset loamy sand, 15 to 60 percent slopes310E7632810879fhbnh00919861:24000
Quonset loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes310B5762810859fh8nh00919861:24000
Quonset loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes310C5312810869fh9nh00919861:24000
Quonset loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes310A4722810849fh7nh00919861:24000
Warwick-Quonset gravelly fine sandy loams, 3 to 8 percent slopesWaB13432798479d6bnh01919811:20000
Quonset gravelly fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopesQsD13412798249d5lnh01919811:20000
Quonset-Warwick gravelly fine sandy loams, 8 to 15 percent slopesQsC6642798239d5knh01919811:20000
Quonset gravelly sandy loam, rollingQoC30082862789lwsri60019771:12000
Quonset gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesQoA4492862779lwrri60019771:12000
Warwick-Quonset complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes97B37762825029gyzvt02119851:20000
Warwick-Quonset complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes97A21252825019gyyvt02119851:20000
Warwick-Quonset complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes97C17722825039gz0vt02119851:20000
Warwick-Quonset complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes97D12852825049gz1vt02119851:20000
Quonset-Warwick complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes98E11432825089gz5vt02119851:20000
Quonset and Warwick soils, 2 to 8 percent slopes3B56142820069gfzvt02519841:20000
Quonset and Warwick soils, 8 to 15 percent slopes3C24572820079gg0vt02519841:20000
Quonset and Warwick soils, 25 to 70 percent slopes3E23492820099gg2vt02519841:20000
Quonset and Warwick soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes3D10932820089gg1vt02519841:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the QUONSET soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .