Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the POTTER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of POTTER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to POTTER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2025-01-21). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
77C06N0711S2006NM041001Pottern/aPrimary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties34.2378616,-103.6151352
77E98P038998TX303002POTTERn/aPrimary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.533638,-101.7801666

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the POTTER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the POTTER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2025-10-03), parsed OSD records (updated 2025-10-07) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2025-12-01).

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the POTTER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2025-10-08).

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the POTTER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2025-10-06).

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with POTTER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2025-10-07) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2025-12-01).

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the POTTER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2025-10-08).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the POTTER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2025-10-06).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with POTTER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2025-12-01).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KS-2012-01-23-23 | Greeley County - December 1961

    Approximate geologic cross section (north and south) through central Greeley County (Soil Survey of Greeley County, Kansas; 1961).

  2. KS-2012-01-23-25 | Hamilton County - November 1961

    Geologic profile extending in a north-south direction through the central part of Hamilton County (Soil Survey of Hamilton County, Kansas; 1961).

  3. KS-2012-01-23-44 | Kearny County - November 1963

    An approximate geologic profile of Kearny County, extending in a north-south direction across the county near Hartland (Soil Survey of Kearny County, Kansas; 1963).

  4. KS-2012-01-24-20 | Morton County - December 1963

    Geologic cross section of the western part of the county. (Based on plate 6 of "Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Morton Co., Kans." (6).) (Soil Survey of Morton County, Kansas; 1963.)

  5. KS-2012-01-25-33 | Scott County - December 1965

    Typical cross section of part of the valley of Ladder (Beaver) Creek (Soil Survey of Scott County, Kansas; 1965).

  6. KS-2012-01-26-30 | Wichita County - November 1965

    Cross section of association 2 along White Woman Creek (Soil Survey of Wichita County, Kansas; 1965).

  7. KS-2012-01-26-31 | Wichita County - November 1965

    Relationship of soils to the landscape and to the common parent materials of Wichita County (Soil Survey of Wichita County, Kansas; 1965).

  8. NM-2012-02-14-17 | Portales Area - May 1959

    Relative position and underlying material of main soils of Portales Valley: A, B, Mansker (shallow) and Potter (very shallow), underlain by rocky caliche and High Plains marl. C, Church, underlain by strongly calcareous lake sediments. D, Drake, underlain by strongly calcareous sediments from lakebeds. E, F, Arch and Portales, underlain by strongly calcareous valley fill of mixed wind- and water-deposited materials. G, Blackwater, underlain by valley fill and, in turn, by hard caliche at moderate depths. H, Clovis, underlain by mixed water- and wind-deposited sediments from the High Plains upland. I, J, K, Kimbrough, Amarillo, and Arvana, underlain by mixed water- and wind-deposited materials from the High Plains upland; Kimbrough soils underlain by hard caliche at shallow depth, and Arvana soils by hard caliche at moderate depth. L, M, Springer (deep) and Tivoli (very deep), underlain by wind-deposited sands (Soil Survey of Portales Area, New Mexico; May 1959).

  9. NM-2012-02-15-01 | Roosevelt County - March 1967

    Generalized diagram of soil patterns that extend southwest to northeast through Roosevelt County (Soil Survey of Roosevelt County, New Mexico; March 1967).

  10. NM-2012-02-15-02 | Southwest Quay Area - May 1960

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material at Blanco Creek on the High Plains. Pullman soils are on gentle slopes at the top of the divide, and Mansker soils are in rolling areas leading to the stream channel (Soil Survey of Southwest Quay Area, New Mexico; May 1960).

  11. OK-2012-02-16-03 | Beaver County - August 1962

    Parent material and parent rock of most of the soils in Beaver County, and their position on the landscape (Soil Survey of Beaver County, Oklahoma; August 1962).

  12. OK-2012-02-16-09 | Cimarron County - June 1960

    Typical landscape in the central and eastern part of Cimarron County: Associations 1, 2, 3, and 5 (Soil Survey of Cimarron County, Oklahoma; June 1960).

  13. OK-2012-02-16-10 | Cimarron County - June 1960

    Typical landscape in the northwestern part of Cimarron County: Associations 3, 4, and 5 (Soil Survey of Cimarron County, Oklahoma; June 1960).

  14. OK-2012-02-16-30 | Ellis County - April 1966

    Major soils of associations 7, 8, and 10 (Soil Survey of Ellis County, Oklahoma; April 1966).

  15. OK-2012-02-16-47 | Harper County - June 1960

    A schematic drawing showing a normal pattern of soils formed on limy outwash. The typical slope range is given for each soil (Soil Survey of Harper County, Oklahoma; June 1960).

  16. OK-2012-02-17-53 | Texas County - July 1961

    Typical pattern of the soils in association 3, Texas County, Okla (Soil Survey of Texas County, Oklahoma; July 1961).

  17. TX-2010-11-02-21 | Carson County -

    Several major soils in the Canadian River Valley of the Rollings Plains (Soil Survey of Carson County, Texas).

  18. TX-2010-11-02-22 | Carson County -

    General relationship of the soils in Carson County (Soil Survey of Carson County, Texas).

  19. TX-2010-11-02-24 | Carson County -

    Typical arrangement of soils in the Manson-Paloduro-Potter association (Soil Survey of Carson County, Texas).

  20. TX-2010-11-02-41 | Deaf Smith County - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils in the Pep-Berda-Bippus general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, Texas; 2007).

  21. TX-2010-11-02-43 | Deaf Smith County - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils in the Plemons-Potter-Mobeetie general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, Texas; 2007).

  22. TX-2010-11-02-45 | Deaf Smith County - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils in the Kimberson-Pep-Potter general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, Texas; 2007).

  23. TX-2010-11-03-31 | Hockley County -

    Berda-Potter-Creta (Soil Survey of Hockely County, Texas).

  24. TX-2010-11-03-71 | Lynn County - 2008

    Pattern of soils and underlying materials in the Midessa-Potter-Drake general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Lynn County, Texas; 2008).

  25. TX-2010-11-03-73 | Lynn County - 2008

    Pattern of soils and underlying materials in the Potter-Obaro-Quinlan general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Lynn County, Texas; 2008).

  26. TX-2012-03-20-05 | Bailey County - April 1963

    Soils and underlying formations associated with a saline lake in Bailey County (Soil Survey of Bailey County, TX; 1963).

  27. TX-2012-03-20-10 | Carson County - July 1962

    General relationship of the soils in Carson County (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  28. TX-2012-03-20-12 | Carson County - July 1962

    Several major soils of the Canadian River Valley of the Rolling Plains. The ranges in slope shown on this figure are those that exist where the figure was drawn (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  29. TX-2012-03-20-13 | Carson County - July 1962

    Typical arrangement of soils in the Mansker-Potter-Berthoud sandy loams complex. The dashed lines indicate boundaries of the component soils (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  30. TX-2012-03-20-15 | Carson County - July 1962

    Soil toposequence of the escarpment separating the High Plains from the Rolling Plains (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  31. TX-2012-03-20-37 | Dawson County - August 1960

    Soils in ancient drain on high plains and associated soils (Soil Survey of Dawson County, TX; 1960).

  32. TX-2012-03-20-38 | Dawson County - August 1960

    Soils on caprock and associated soils on high plains and rolling plains (Soil Survey of Dawson County, TX; 1960).

  33. TX-2012-03-20-39 | Deaf Smith County - August 1968

    Topography and underlying material of the Mobeetie (3); Quay-Montoya-Vernon (8); and Mobeetie-Potter-Rough broken land (4) associations (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, TX; 1968).

  34. TX-2012-03-21-04 | Hansford County - June 1960

    Diagram showing typical locations of soil series and the underlying parent material (Soil Survey of Hansford County, TX; 1960).

  35. TX-2012-03-21-23 | Lamb County - March 1962

    Soils and underlying formations surrounding a saline lake (now Bull and Illusion Lakes) (Soil Survey of Lamb County, TX; 1962).

  36. TX-2012-03-21-35 | Lipscomb County - December 1975

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in association 2 (Soil Survey of Lipscomb County, TX; 1975).

  37. TX-2012-03-21-65 | Runnels County - March 1970

    Soils formed in plains outwash (Soil Survey of Runnels County, TX; 1970).

  38. TX-2012-03-21-91 | Terry County - February 1962

    Soils in an ancient drain and associated soils (Soil Survey of Terry County, TX; 1962).

  39. TX-2012-03-22-07 | Wheeler County - October 1975

    Relationship of soils in the Abilene-Mobeetie-Berda association to parent material and relief (Soil Survey of Wheeler County, TX; 1975).

Map Units

Map units containing POTTER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Potter gravelly loamPo22083942103511co00919661:20000
Potter and Stoneham gravelly loams, 3 to 35 percent slopesPsE49439486935q9co09919631:15840
Potter and Nihill gravelly soils, 1 to 5 percent slopesPnC5399486835q8co09919631:15840
Mansker-Potter association, cool, 1 to 9 percent slopesMKcD425031561902xxx2nm02119681:31680
Mansker-Potter association, gently slopingMK4216376362dmmqnm02119681:31680
Mobeetie-Potter association, 1 to 15 percent slopesMW11781376448dmqhnm02519671:20000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPGE199601547916f7g2nm04120141:24000
Berda-Potter complex, 3 to 12 percent slopesBpD96192200321db49nm04120141:24000
Potter-Mobeetie association, 8 to 45 percent slopesPMG2761884288f7g3nm04120141:24000
Potter-Simona complex, 5 to 25 percent slopesPS20439559001w57nm61419661:20000
Potter-Mobeetie association, 8 to 45 percent slopesPMG12918377742f7g3nm66920051:24000
Bascom-Potter loams, 1 to 9 percent slopesBG17521376107dmchnm67619691:31680
Bascom-Potter fine sandy loams, cool, 1 to 9 percent slopesBFcD769231562072yk5snm67619691:31680
Bascom-Potter fine sandy loams, 1 to 9 percent slopesBF6269376097dmc5nm67619691:31680
Potter loam, cool, 1 to 9 percent slopesPTcD624631562152yk6fnm67619691:31680
Bascom-Potter loams, cool, 1 to 9 percent slopesBGcD469631562082yk5vnm67619691:31680
Potter loam, 1 to 9 percent slopesPT3889376157dmf3nm67619691:31680
Bascom-Potter complex, 1 to 9 percent slopesBh276376108dmcjnm67619691:31680
Potter loam, 1 to 9 percent slopesPo221376158dmf4nm67619691:31680
Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes, coolMe342333820652tqtdok02519581:20000
Mansic-Potter complex, 8 to 45 percent slopesMc5073384745dxc4ok12919611:24000
Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes, coolMp1046113849132tqtdok13919591:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopes, coolPt650333849172w84cok13919591:24000
Potter gravelly loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesPtC13223624133093ytx00319701:31680
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesBo409693624682tqtztx01119631:20000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopes, coolPs146983624872w84ctx01119631:20000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPs3605362602f7g2tx01719601:20000
Kimberson-Potter complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesKpC782129623071t20qtx03319701:24000
Veal-Potter complex, 1 to 12 percent slopesVpE718829623182xrw7tx03319701:24000
Veal-Potter complex, moist, 1 to 8 percent slopesVaD4172362976d5pxtx03319701:24000
Berda-Potter-Rock outcrop association, 5 to 45 percent slopesBPG24822962301plhctx03319701:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter association, 5 to 20 percent slopesMVE3032962345f6lhtx03319701:24000
Potter-Veal-Rock outcrop association, 12 to 60 percent slopesPVG184423258052308q6tx04519721:20000
Berda-Potter-Rock outcrop association, 5 to 45 percent slopesBPG36753258061plhctx04519721:20000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMVE132653779572tqtztx06520001:24000
Manson-Paloduro-Potter association, 3 to 12 percent slopesMPE1183037798430k1mtx06520001:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopes, coolPGE112123937702w84ctx06520001:24000
Potter-Mobeetie association, 8 to 45 percent slopesPMG6782377964f7g3tx06520001:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPt492363775f7g2tx06919691:20000
Midessa, Potter and Posey soils, 3 to 12 percent slopesMPP11642931526f5srtx07919621:20000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPGE332931532f7g2tx07919621:20000
Berda-Vernon-Potter association, undulatingBVB27362363962d6qqtx08119681:24000
Mansker-Potter complex, 1 to 30 percent slopesMl518763647222yk8qtx10719641:20000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPs4435364734f7g2tx10719641:20000
Kimberson-Potter complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesKpC7594393612f6l5tx11520041:24000
Berda-Potter-Rock outcrop association, 5 to 45 percent slopesBPG7101393599plhctx11520041:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter association, 5 to 20 percent slopesMVE2644393622f6lhtx11520041:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPGE1012393636f7g2tx11520041:24000
Berda-Potter complex, 3 to 12 percent slopesBpD8693378046db49tx11719991:24000
Potter-Mobeetie association, 8 to 45 percent slopesPMG7207378059f7g3tx11719991:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMVE43933780522tqtztx11719991:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPGE2831378080f7g2tx11719991:24000
Berda-Potter association, 3 to 30 percent slopesBPF260843651083093vtx12519651:20000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMxD826963651902tqtztx12919751:24000
Berda-Potter-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 45 percent slopesBpG1486336521430krntx12919751:24000
Berda-Pep-Potter association, rollingBpF11628365213d812tx12919751:24000
Potter loam, 1 to 8 percent slopesPtD2568365198d80ltx12919751:24000
Berda-Potter-Rock outcrop association, 5 to 45 percent slopesBPG12810607446plhctx15320041:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPGE424695971f7g2tx15320041:24000
Circleback-Potter complex, 5 to 12 percent slopesTx74963660542tw41tx16519641:20000
Berda-Potter complex, 3 to 12 percent slopesBe6467366033db49tx16519641:20000
Mobeetie-Potter association, 3 to 20 percent slopesMP1667137833330949tx16919651:24000
Potter gravelly loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesPtC34103783523093xtx16919651:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 8 percent slopesPoD616366247d93ftx17319741:31680
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMxD435603919352tqtztx17919651:20000
Potter-Berda-Catesby complex, 5 to 20 percent slopesPmE2844439194530krptx17919651:20000
Potter gravelly loam, 1 to 8 percent slopesPt3193669143094htx18919691:20000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopes, coolPGE2815119484272w84ctx19520071:24000
Potter-Mobeetie association, 8 to 45 percent slopes, coolPMG2169319484282w84dtx19520071:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMVE1652919484252tqtztx19520071:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMVD677863674432tqtztx20519731:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopes, coolPoE205273674532w84ctx20519731:24000
Berda-Potter-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 45 percent slopesBpG884336742330krntx20519731:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMx174733675742tqtztx21119671:20000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopes, coolPe75823675762w84ctx21119671:20000
Berda-Potter complex, 3 to 12 percent slopesBpD2338378975db49tx21919991:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPGE746378990f7g2tx21919991:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPs41116391901f7g2tx22719651:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMVE448033679292tqtztx23319721:24000
Berda-Potter-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 45 percent slopesBPF1719536790330krntx23319721:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopes, coolPtE72993679352w84ctx23319721:24000
Potter gravelly loam, 8 to 30 percent slopesPsE2701394297308pytx27919601:20000
Potter gravelly loam, 1 to 8 percent slopesPsC8833942963094htx27919601:20000
Berda and Potter soils, 5 to 12 percent slopesBeD497883694432tqt5tx29519711:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMXD360023694592tqtztx29519711:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopes, coolPrD84523694722w84ctx29519711:24000
Potter loam, 2 to 12 percent slopesPtD5386369859308pxtx30319751:20000
Berda-Potter association, 10 to 30 percent slopesBPE48313698313093wtx30319751:20000
Potter-Berda association, 20 to 45 percent slopesPBG381236986030943tx30319751:20000
Potter-Kimberson-Urban land complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesPKU1089369862308q4tx30319751:20000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPGE11353379056f7g2tx30519991:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter association, 5 to 20 percent slopesMVE1607379046f7fmtx30519991:24000
Midessa, Potter and Posey soils, 3 to 12 percent slopesMPP639379047f5srtx30519991:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPs3819370350f7g2tx31719681:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPt1173370643f7g2tx32919661:31680
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMvC203373708262tqtztx34119681:24000
Berda and Potter soils, 5 to 20 percent slopesBpF8130370852308qvtx34519721:24000
Potter loam, 3 to 20 percent slopesPoD1412370890dfy6tx34519721:24000
Flomot-Potter complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesFpB942370862dfx9tx34519721:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopes, coolPo240943710922w84ctx35719661:20000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMVE6974431241532tqtztx35919781:24000
Potter-Mobeetie association, 8 to 45 percent slopes, coolPMG1054031241612w84dtx35919781:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopes, coolPGE781831241602w84ctx35919781:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPGE14952599159f7g2tx36919731:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMVE3268631242222tqtztx37519741:24000
Potter-Mobeetie association, 8 to 45 percent slopes, coolPMG1116731242292w84dtx37519741:24000
Potter-Mobeetie association, 8 to 45 percent slopesPMG21278371399f7g3tx38119991:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPGE8386371402f7g2tx38119991:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMVE73613713932tqtztx38119991:24000
Berda-Potter complex, 3 to 12 percent slopesBpD3622371385db49tx38119991:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter urban land association, 5 to 20 percent slopesMVU244630009p4kwtx38119991:24000
Berda-Potter-Urban land complexBpU57643354plgctx38119991:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMxD998703715232tqtztx39319791:24000
Berda-Potter-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 45 percent slopesBpG7168537154430krntx39319791:24000
Paloduro-Pep-Potter association, rollingPpPF64639371531dglwtx39319791:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopes, coolPGE124413715322w84ctx39319791:24000
Potter soilsPt63603371783dgw0tx39919651:20000
Cho and Potter soils, undulatingKTD48285372244dhbwtx43119741:31680
Potter and Tulia soilsPt1831372343dhg2tx43719701:20000
Midessa, Potter and Posey soils, 3 to 12 percent slopesMPP5261372555f5srtx44519991:24000
Potter soils, 3 to 20 percent slopesPGE948372562f7g2tx44519991:24000
Berda and Potter soils, 5 to 12 percent slopesBpD50953732782tqt5tx48319701:24000
Mobeetie-Veal-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMsD35763733162tqtztx48319701:24000
Midessa-Potter complex, 3 to 20 percent slopesMPE217229622381idxztx50119621:31680
Midessa, Potter and Posey soils, 3 to 12 percent slopesMPP4962931480f5srtx50119621:31680

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the POTTER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2025-10-19).