Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the POSITAS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of POSITAS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to POSITAS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
1440A2928S1959CA001001POSITAS5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.6502762,-121.6961136
1440A2929S1959CA001002POSITAS5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.6255569,-121.7852783

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the POSITAS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the POSITAS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the POSITAS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the POSITAS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with POSITAS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the POSITAS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the POSITAS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with POSITAS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CA-2012-05-08-17 | Alameda Area - March 1966

    The relationship of geologic formations, landforms, and soil series in the Alameda Area (Soil Survey of Alameda Area, California; March, 1966).

Map Units

Map units containing POSITAS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Goldeagle-Positas-Balcom complex, 30 to 75 percent slopes27532913461618hhbxca01119991:24000
Positas gravelly sandy loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes2765950461619hhbyca01119991:24000
Positas loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesPkA1310455839h9bhca01319731:24000
Positas loam, 2 to 9 percent slopesPkC760455840h9bjca01319731:24000
Positas gravelly loam, 0 to 9 percent slopesPsC1097459849hfhvca09719681:20000
Positas gravelly loam, 9 to 15 percent slopesPsD330459850hfhwca09719681:20000
Positas gravelly loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes, erodedPfF28251459257hdwrca11319681:20000
Positas gravelly loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes, severely erodedPfF34595459258hdwsca11319681:20000
Positas gravelly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, erodedPfE22073459256hdwqca11319681:20000
Positas gravelly loam, 2 to 20 percent slopes, erodedPoC28984456610hb4cca60919631:20000
Positas gravelly loam, 20 to 40 percent slopes, erodedPoE28179456611hb4dca60919631:20000
Positas gravelly loam, 40 to 60 percent slopes, erodedPoF23335456612hb4fca60919631:20000
Positas gravelly loam, thick surface, 2 to 10 percent slopes, erodedPtB22271456613hb4gca60919631:20000
Positas gravelly clay loam, 2 to 15 percent slopesPaD941463290hk2vca64919671:24000
Positas gravelly loam, 30 to 45 percent slopesPzaE671464427hl8jca65419661:24000
Positas gravelly loam, 9 to 30 percent slopesPzaD396464426hl8hca65419661:24000
Positas gravelly loam, 3 to 9 percent slopesPzaB296464425hl8gca65419661:24000
Arbuckle-Positas complex, 9 to 15 percent slopes10216365457205hbrkca66519771:24000
Arbuckle-Positas complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes10313345457206hbrlca66519771:24000
Arbuckle-Positas complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes1045835457207hbrmca66519771:24000
Arbuckle-Positas complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes1054545457208hbrnca66519771:24000
Positas fine sandy loam, 2 to 9 percent slopesPtC6458457471hc14ca67219661:20000
Positas fine sandy loam, 9 to 15 percent slopesPtD3113457472hc15ca67219661:20000
Positas fine sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesPtE1345457474hc17ca67219661:20000
Positas cobbly fine sandy loam, 2 to 15 percent slopesPuD657457475hc18ca67219661:20000
Positas fine sandy loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes, severely erodedPtD3176457473hc16ca67219661:20000
Milpitas-Positas fine sandy loams, 2 to 9 percent slopesMeC5585457625hc63ca67319741:24000
Milpitas-Positas fine sandy loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes, erodedMeD24881457626hc64ca67319741:24000
Milpitas-Positas fine sandy loams, 15 to 30 percent slopes, erodedMeE21574457627hc65ca67319741:24000
Milpitas-Positas fine sandy loams, 30 to 50 percent slopes, erodedMeF2640457628hc66ca67319741:24000
Positas-Bitcreek complex, 2 to 9 percent slopes6002864466570hnhnca69120081:24000
Positas fine sandy loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes, severely erodedPtD32814128831jf6wca77219811:24000
Positas cobbly fine sandy loam, 2 to 15 percent slopesPuD1514128841jf6xca77219811:24000
Arbuckle-Positas complex, 9 to 15 percent slopes102pr414128681jf6dca77219811:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the POSITAS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .