Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the POOTATUCK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of POOTATUCK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to POOTATUCK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14591P081991MA011001Pootatuck7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.4736099,-72.5833359

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the POOTATUCK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the POOTATUCK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the POOTATUCK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the POOTATUCK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with POOTATUCK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the POOTATUCK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the POOTATUCK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with POOTATUCK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CT-2011-05-31-11 | Windham County - 1981

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Hinckley-Merrimac association (Soil Survey of Windham County, Conneticut; 1981).

  2. MA-2012-02-03-08 | Worcester County, Southern Part - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Freetown-Swansea-Saco association (Soil Survey of Worcester County, Massachusetts, Southern Part; 1998).

  3. NH-2012-02-14-02 | Cheshire County - June 1989

    Typical landscape pattern of soils and underlying material in the Windsor-Agawam-Hoosic general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Cheshire County, New Hampshire; June 1989).

  4. NH-2012-02-14-08 | Grafton County Area - 1999

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Windsor-Hitchcock-Quonset unit (Soil Survey of Grafton County Area, New Hampshire; 1999).

Map Units

Map units containing POOTATUCK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Pootatuck fine sandy loam102389533956379ljnct60120031:12000
Pootatuck fine sandy loam102515133960109ljnct60220031:12000
Pootatuck very fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded2A10282788209c46ma01120121:12000
Pootatuck fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded2A12462767612zvd5ma01719911:24000
Pootatuck fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded2A119030702zvfvma60719751:15840
Pootatuck fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded2A2432775422zvdlma60819891:25000
Pootatuck fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded2A16152777732zvdqma60919801:15840
Pootatuck fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded2A4277898522zvf7ma61019851:25000
Pootatuck fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded2A8442780232zvdwma61519921:25000
Pootatuck fine sandy loam421022796719d0nnh00519851:20000
Pootatuck very fine sandy loam44652811229fjgnh00919861:24000
Lim-Pootatuck complex30519662793079cmxnh01519861:24000
Pootatuck fine sandy loamPu7442810079fdrnh60119801:20000
Pootatuck very fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded4A9582801969dklnh60920071:24000
Urban land-Pootatuck complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes498A8672802169dl7nh60920071:24000
Pootatuck-Suncook-Olinville complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedPSOA624861562pg1lny00520141:12000
Pootatuck-Olinville complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedPOA324861532pg1hny00520141:12000
Pootatuck-Fluventic Hapludolls complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedPFA224861542pg1jny00520141:12000
Pootatuck fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesPrA86017144241vk00ny03120071:24000
Pootatuck fine sandy loamPs6652919059sr9ny04519811:15840
Pootatuck-Fluventic Hapludolls complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedPFA727777062pg1jny08520141:12000
Pootatuck fine sandy loamPp12452862749lwnri60019771:12000
Pootatuck fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes34A15572814559fw6vt00319921:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the POOTATUCK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .