Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the POGUE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of POGUE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to POGUE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
869C0047S1969WA047008POGUE5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties48.4492798,-119.5703278
869C0048S1969WA047009POGUE3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties48.3845558,-119.5711594

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the POGUE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the POGUE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the POGUE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the POGUE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with POGUE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the POGUE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the POGUE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with POGUE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WA-2010-11-05-05 | Douglas County - 2008

    Cross section of the area from the Columbia River to the top of Badge Mountain (Soil Survey of Douglas County, Washington; 2008).

  2. WA-2012-05-11-41 | Douglas County - May 2008

    Cross-section of the area from the Columbia River to the top of Badger Mountain (Soil Survey of Douglas County, Washington; May 2008).

Map Units

Map units containing POGUE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Pogue fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes2623139699517rgx2wa01719981:12000
Pogue cobbly fine sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes2662521699530rgxhwa01719981:12000
Pogue extremely stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 25 percent slopes2681987699531rgxjwa01719981:12000
Pogue fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes2611049699507rgwrwa01719981:12000
Pogue loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes2701006699550rgy4wa01719981:12000
Pogue gravelly fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes265594699526rgxcwa01719981:12000
Pogue cobbly fine sandy loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes267556699544rgxywa01719981:12000
Pogue gravelly fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes264548699524rgx9wa01719981:12000
Pogue bouldery fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes269337699547rgy1wa01719981:12000
Pogue fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes263192699521rgx6wa01719981:12000
Pogue gravelly fine sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopesPrE880733812gc4wa60719691:20000
Pogue gravelly fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesPrB873733782gc1wa60719691:20000
Pogue fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesPoC548733772gc0wa60719691:20000
Pogue very stony fine sandy loam, 0 to 45 percent slopesPsE478733822gc5wa60719691:20000
Pogue gravelly fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesPrC405733792gc2wa60719691:20000
Pogue gravelly fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesPrD290733802gc3wa60719691:20000
Pogue fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesPoB282733762gbzwa60719691:20000
Pogue fine sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes3543314704942vzwswa64819871:24000
Pogue stony fine sandy loam, 0 to 25 percent slopes3582202704982cc4wa64819871:24000
Pogue gravelly fine sandy loam, 0 to 10 percent slopes3571520704972cc3wa64819871:24000
Pogue fine sandy loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes355724704952cc1wa64819871:24000
Pogue stony fine sandy loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes359510704992cc5wa64819871:24000
Pogue fine sandy loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes356498704962vzwtwa64819871:24000
Pogue gravelly fine sandy loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony46013215189986721rz1wa64920081:24000
Pogue fine sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes4551234018998582vzwswa64920081:24000
Pogue gravelly fine sandy loam, 0 to 25 percent slopes, extremely stony4599555189986621rz0wa64920081:24000
Pogue fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes4566810189985921ryswa64920081:24000
Pogue gravelly fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes4613260189986421ryywa64920081:24000
Pogue fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes4572590189986121ryvwa64920081:24000
Pogue gravelly fine sandy loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes4622540189986521ryzwa64920081:24000
Pogue fine sandy loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes458113518998632vzwtwa64920081:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the POGUE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .