Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the PLANKINTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of PLANKINTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to PLANKINTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the PLANKINTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the PLANKINTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PLANKINTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PLANKINTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with PLANKINTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PLANKINTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PLANKINTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with PLANKINTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. SD-2012-03-15-50 | Hyde County - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Glenham-Prosper-Java association (Soil Survey of Hyde County, SD; 1998).

  2. SD-2012-03-15-57 | Jerauld County - September 1994

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Homme-Peno association (Soil Survey of Jerauld County, SD; 1994).

  3. SD-2012-03-15-58 | Jerauld County - September 1994

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Clarno-Ethan-Prosper association (Soil Survey of Jerauld County, SD; 1994).

  4. SD-2012-03-15-88 | Potter County - October 1985

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Highmore association (Soil Survey of Potter County, SD; 1985).

  5. SD-2012-03-15-89 | Potter County - October 1985

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Glenham-Java association (Soil Survey of Potter County, SD; 1985).

Map Units

Map units containing PLANKINTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Hoven-Plankinton silt loamsHw25195354860cx83sd00319791:20000
Plankinton-Prosper complexPt13881354866cx89sd00319791:20000
Houdek-Plankinton complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesHoB12063548572yyh6sd00319791:20000
Plankinton silt loamPk6693353835cw61sd06919921:20000
Plankinton-Crossplain complexPr9966356456cyxlsd07319871:20000
Plankinton silt loamPk3787356455cyxksd07319871:20000
Onita-Plankinton silt loamsOp2575356452cyxgsd07319871:20000
Plankinton silt loamPk3434355359cxs6sd10719831:20000
Glenham-Prosper-Plankinton complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesGpB314535532830t38sd10719831:20000
Glenham-Prosper-Plankinton complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesGpB2341157230t38sd11919671:20000
Mobridge-Plankinton silt loamsMp35879355525cxyksd60319831:20000
Plankinton silt loamPa30348355537cxyysd60319831:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the PLANKINTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .