Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the PINUSCREEK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of PINUSCREEK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to PINUSCREEK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
43C93P03521992OR063003Pinuscreek6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.6341667,-118.3344421
43C95P0896S1995OR001002Pinuscreek6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.6341667,-118.3455582

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the PINUSCREEK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the PINUSCREEK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PINUSCREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PINUSCREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with PINUSCREEK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PINUSCREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PINUSCREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with PINUSCREEK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing PINUSCREEK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Pinuscreek-Rebarrow complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4116BO40725938831r0f1or60419881:24000
Webbgulch-Pinuscreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4124BO36625938901qxwpor60419881:24000
Crackercreek-Pinuscreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1705BO29025938691qzfpor60419881:24000
Pinuscreek-Crackercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4120CO28525938871r0f5or60419881:24000
Pinuscreek-Rebarrow-Thirstygulch complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4117CO14825938841r0f2or60419881:24000
Pinuscreek-Bennettcreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1708CO11025938731qzfvor60419881:24000
Kamela-Pinuscreek-Fivebeaver complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5922CO8625939342mtbgor60419881:24000
Troutmeadows-Mountireland-Pinuscreek complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes1819NO269231207811v6bxor60720181:24000
Pinuscreek-Payraise-Dunstan complex, landslide, 15 to 30 percent slopes1356BL138231203941qzfhor60720181:24000
Pinuscreek-Payraise-Dunstan complex, landslide, 30 to 60 percent slopes1356CL93431207781v6b0or60720181:24000
Pinuscreek-Payraise-Dunstan complex, landslide, 0 to 15 percent slopes1356AL29931203931qzfgor60720181:24000
Pinuscreek-Bennettcreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1708CO9031203951qzfvor60720181:24000
Pinuscreek-Bennettcreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1708CO497233853091qzfvor62620181:24000
Kamela-Pinuscreek-Fivebeaver complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5922CO443131223622mtbgor62620181:24000
Pinuscreek-Bennettcreek-McWillis complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4175CO343931221021q6slor62620181:24000
Pinuscreek-Bennettcreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1708BO295033853081qzftor62620181:24000
Kamela-Crackercreek-Pinuscreek complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes1737CO182831221271qcw9or62620181:24000
Webbgulch-Pinuscreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4124BO69731221481qxwpor62620181:24000
Anatone-Klicker-Pinuscreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4172CO57431222871r0ytor62620181:24000
Rebarrow-Pinuscreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4115AO8231222761r0f0or62620181:24000
Pinuscreek-Crackercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4120CO631222781r0f5or62620181:24000
Crackercreek-Pinuscreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1705BO531222041qzfpor62620181:24000
Pinuscreek-Rebarrow-Thirstygulch complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4117CO1230424371691r0f2or63120181:24000
Pinuscreek-Rebarrow complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4116BO962024371681r0f1or63120181:24000
Pinuscreek-Bennettcreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1708BO822724864621qzftor63120181:24000
Pinuscreek-Bennettcreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes1708CO651824864631qzfvor63120181:24000
Pinuscreek-Crackercreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4120CO634324371711r0f5or63120181:24000
Crackercreek-Pinuscreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1705BO470724957341qzfpor63120181:24000
Rebarrow-Pinuscreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes4115AO466824371671r0f0or63120181:24000
Webbgulch-Pinuscreek complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4124BO444024868171qxwpor63120181:24000
Kamela-Pinuscreek-Fivebeaver complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5922CO337324374202mtbgor63120181:24000
Limberjim-Pinuscreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3306CO38424866281q6ywor63120181:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the PINUSCREEK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .