Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the PINNTANK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of PINNTANK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to PINNTANK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the PINNTANK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the PINNTANK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PINNTANK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PINNTANK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with PINNTANK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PINNTANK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PINNTANK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with PINNTANK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. AZ-2011-05-27-22 | Hualapai-Havasupai Area - 1999

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Pinntank-Pocomate-Theecan general soil map unit. Parts of the Coconino Plateau in the survey area are overlain by deep, alluvial deposits that have been uplifted and eroded into dessected hills, Theecan soils are derived from these deposits (Soil Survey of Hualapai-Havasupai Area, Arizona; 1999).

Map Units

Map units containing PINNTANK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Phizphre-Tovar-Toqui complex, coconino plateau, 1 to 12 percent slopes3594104150344152831kgdaz6951:24000
Pinntank-Pocomate complex, kaibab plateau, 1 to 23 percent slopes419342678344148831kgzaz6951:24000
Pinntank-Pocomate complex, coconino plateau, 2 to 15 percent slopes459312002344143530sf5az6951:24000
Pinntank-Retsover complex, kaibab plateau, 0 to 14 percent slopes41919697344143430sf2az6951:24000
Pinntank-Pocomate complex, san francisco volcanic field, 2 to18 percent slopes40934172344151731kh1az6951:24000
Pinntank-Retsover complex, coconino plateau, 2 to 19 percent slopes45913476344153031khcaz6951:24000
Pinntank-Retsover complex, san francisco volcanic field, 1 to 6 percent slopes4091157344151831kh2az6951:24000
Pinntank-Pocomate-Retsover complex, 1 to 30 percent slopes3126720544961tpyaz69919931:24000
Pinntank fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes306100545051tq7az69919931:24000
Pocomate-Pinntank-Toqui complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes9411585615985nnzhaz70120011:24000
Pocomate-Pinntank-Ustifluvents complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes953697615986nnzjaz70120011:24000
Pinntank-Retsover complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes913055615982nnzdaz70120011:24000
Pocomate-Pinntank complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes93735615984nnzgaz70120011:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the PINNTANK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .