Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the PINKSTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of PINKSTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to PINKSTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
13688P066688NC077004Pinkston7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.1083336,-78.7361145
13681P0647S1981NC105003APinkston7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.5000954,-79.2497559

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the PINKSTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the PINKSTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PINKSTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PINKSTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with PINKSTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PINKSTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PINKSTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with PINKSTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing PINKSTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 10 to 25 percent slopesPfE36901123393rwvnc06319711:15840
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 2 to 10 percent slopesPfC7311123383rwtnc06319711:15840
Pinkston loamy sand, 10 to 20 percent slopesPnD16711127813sc3nc07719931:24000
Pinkston silt loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesPfF109101135973t6fnc10519821:24000
Pinkston silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesPfD74661135963t6dnc10519821:24000
Pinkston silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesPfB62081135953t6cnc10519821:24000
Pinkston silt loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesPkF63151139273tk2nc12519871:24000
Pinkston silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesPkD45301139263tk1nc12519871:24000
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesPnF163413838331hfzsnc15719831:24000
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesPnC25213838341hfztnc15719831:24000
Clover-Pinkston complex, 25 to 45 percent slopesCpE133723888482l5smnc16919921:24000
Clover-Pinkston complex, 25 to 45 percent slopesCpF25223982732lhlnnc19719601:15840
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 10 to 25 percent slopesPkE4231187773zljva03719701:15840
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopesPkC2271187763zlhva03719701:15840
Pinkston gravelly sandy loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes165D6041188453znqva04119741:15840
Pinkston gravelly sandy loam, 20 to 45 percent slopes165F2981188463znrva04119741:15840
Pinkston gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes165C2081188443znpva04119741:15840
Mayodan, clayey substratum-Pinkston sandy loams, 20 to 45 percent slopes201F991188623zp8va04119741:15840
Pinkston-Mayodan fine sandy loams, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded32D24371190243zvhva07519761:15840
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, eroded31C24271190223zvfva07519761:15840
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes, eroded31E23321190233zvgva07519761:15840
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes38D22114728421lfm1va08320041:24000
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes38C9114728411lfm0va08320041:24000
Pinkston-Mayodan sandy loams, 7 to 15 percent slopes58C20901191453zzdva08519761:15840
Pinkston-Mayodan sandy loams, 15 to 25 percent slopes58D18401191463zzfva08519761:15840
Pinkston-Mayodan sandy loams, 25 to 45 percent slopes58E17501191473zzgva08519761:15840
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 6 to 25 percent slopesPoE254119270403fva08719731:15840
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesPkD34911990340rvva13719661:15840
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopesPkC14511990240rtva13719661:15840
Pinkston cobbly sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes28C27641199822yzsqva14319891:24000
Pinkston-Clover complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony29D25471199852yzstva14319891:24000
Pinkston-Clover complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes, very stony29C18671199842yzssva14319891:24000
Pinkston-Clover complex, 35 to 50 percent slopes, very stony29E16441199862yzsvva14319891:24000
Pinkston cobbly sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes28D15671199832yzsrva14319891:24000
Pinkston and Penn soils, 15 to 25 percent slopesPpE109512075541nbva63119731:15840
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesPkD76312075441n9va63119731:15840
Pinkston fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesPkB23412075341n8va63119731:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the PINKSTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .