Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the PINEHILL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of PINEHILL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to PINEHILL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the PINEHILL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the PINEHILL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PINEHILL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PINEHILL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with PINEHILL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PINEHILL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PINEHILL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with PINEHILL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing PINEHILL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Pinehill loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes64C8148343604cjk0mt01719951:24000
Pinehill-Absher complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes641D4674343601cjjxmt01719951:24000
Creed-Pinehill loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes811C2786343693cjmwmt01719951:24000
Pinehill loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes64A1547343603cjjzmt01719951:24000
Pinehill loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes64D953343605cjk1mt01719951:24000
Pinehill-Weingart-Gerdrum complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes993C60343834cjsfmt01719951:24000
Pinelli loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes1042567344780ckrymt07919861:24000
Pinelli-Weingart-Gerdrum complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes1051484344781ckrzmt07919861:24000
Pinelli loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes103792344779ckrxmt07919861:24000
Vanstel-Pinehill complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes33224013877771hl30mt64319671:20000
Pinehill clay loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes30513713877681hl2qmt64319671:20000
Pinehill complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes30712613877701hl2smt64319671:20000
Pinehill-Pylon loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes3085913877711hl2tmt64319671:20000
Pinehill-Pylon clay loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes3062913877691hl2rmt64319671:20000
Mantlemine-Pinehill, stony-Peta complex, 4 to 50 percent slopes945332030872zbslwy6291:24000
Kremlin-Pinehill complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes945832031082zbt9wy6291:24000
Coyoteflats-Pinehill complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes235032504762zv71wy6291:24000
Amalia-like-Scravo, very stony-Pinehill complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes440931709582z1znwy6291:24000
Pinehill-Yamacall-Hawksell-like complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes536132030692zbs0wy6291:24000
Shooter-Pinehill complex 0 to 7 percent slopes744341047131g8vwy6301:24000
Golphco-Pinehill complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes5521519723706912kkwxwy6351:24000
Pinehill-Pylon clay loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes3062796817561wfqywy70520031:24000
Pinehill-Pylon loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes3082136817552wfqnwy70520031:24000
Pinehill complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes3071019817550wfqlwy70520031:24000
Pinehill clay loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes305632817559wfqwwy70520031:24000
Vanstel-Pinehill complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes332332817569wfr6wy70520031:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the PINEHILL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .