Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the PHARO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of PHARO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to PHARO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
28A85P093885UT027001Pharo7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.7080574,-112.5902786

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the PHARO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the PHARO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PHARO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PHARO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with PHARO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PHARO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PHARO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with PHARO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing PHARO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Palinor-Pharo-Hundraw association18614398478249j1ndnv76619941:24000
Pharo-Bobs-Pookaloo association11619514478590j20dnv76619941:24000
Tecomar-Pookaloo-Pharo association2036845478259j1nqnv76619941:24000
Pharo-Izar-Okan association5016701478362j1s1nv76619941:24000
Urmafot-Pharo association5525412478716j24gnv76619941:24000
Pharo-Kzin association8302881478484j1wznv76619941:24000
Jarab-Drewing-Pharo association38903422157242dcmznv77820131:24000
Jarab-Drewing-Pharo association389012852481074j4ljnv78319911:24000
Pharo, very stony-Lodar, extremely stony-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 70 percent slopesXVG665749227t4mmut0131:24000
Pharo very stony loam, 3 to 10 percent slopesPgC3309482581j654ut60819811:24000
Pharo coarse sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesPfC1226482960j6kcut61219671:20000
Mill Hollow-Pharo association, 2 to 30 percent slopesMNF11020484628j895ut64019671:20000
Pharo very cobbly loam, 3 to 30 percent slopesPVF9250484666j8bdut64019671:20000
Pharo loam, 3 to 10 percent slopesPtD2120484671j8bkut64019671:20000
Pharo loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesPtB1875484670j8bjut64019671:20000
Pharo-Ushar association, 3 to 30 percent slopes, erodedPWF21145484667j8bfut64019671:20000
Pharo loam, 3 to 10 percent slopes, erodedPUD2580484665j8bcut64019671:20000
Reywat-Pharo-Amtoft families, complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes190581656mj83ut6491:24000
Calita-Pharo-Kanarra families association, 5 to 30 percent slopes123625176nzjzut6491:24000
Mill Hollow family-Pharo family, very stony-Toopits family complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes40H769796595vqxmut6511:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the PHARO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .